Cited by 9Sleep and related disordersParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Parkinson's Disease: A Case Series Study 1

Open access
Osawa, Chihaya, Kamei, Yuichi, Nozaki, Kentaro, Furusawa, Yoshihiko, Murata, Miho·2021·Japanese Psychological Research

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) patients frequently suffer from insomnia and insomnia can result in reduction of quality of life in PD. Although pharmacotherapy is most applicable for insomnia, it may cause side‐effects in PD. The purpose of the study was to investigate the efficacy of brief cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI) in PD. A total of 11 PD patients aged 43–84 years with chronic insomnia received two sessions of CBTI. Patients reported a significant decrease in total score for the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The total score for the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) improved. Although objective sleep measured by actigraph did not improve, subjective sleep measured by sleep diary improved. Functional impairment measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) significantly decreased. These results revealed that brief CBTI was effective in improving insomnia in PD, with improvements extending to functional impairments that had been affected by insomnia. Additionally, this non‐pharmacotherapy treatment could be easily applied to PD patients who may have difficulty coming to the clinic frequently due to physical symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jpr.12287

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational studies showed significant improvements in QoL after group CBT or brief CBT, but no notable differences at all time points after mixed in-person and telephone-delivered individual CBT in another.

    “Findings from observational studies showed significant improvements in quality of life post-intervention after group CBT (Berardelli et al., 2015) or brief CBT (Osawa, Kamei, Nozaki, Furusawa, & Murata, 2020), but no notable differences at all time points after mixed in-person and telephone-delivered individual CBT in another (Veazey et al., 2009).”

    From Psychological interventions for people with Parkinson's disease in the early 2020s: Where do we stand? (2021) · cites this paper as Osawa, Kamei, Nozaki, Furusawa, & Murata, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osawa, C., Kamei, Y., Nozaki, K., Furusawa, Y., & Murata, M.
Affiliations
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • Kamisuwa Hospital Japan
  • Counseling Room Higashimatsuyama Japan
Corresponding author
Kamei, Yuichi
Venue
Japanese Psychological Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-15
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
59-71
ISSN
  • 0021-5368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5884
OpenAlex
W3016552760
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Japanese Psychological Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, Parkinson's disease, chronic insomnia, brief psychotherapy, non-pharmacological treatment, Insomnia Severity Index, Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, functional disability, sleep quality, actigraphy, sleep diary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review