Cited by 579Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Insomnia: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Direct Comparison

Jacobs, Gregg D., Pace-Schott, Edward F., Stickgold, Robert, Otto, Michael W.·2004·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Chronic sleep-onset insomnia is a prevalent health complaint in adults. Although behavioral and pharmacological therapies have been shown to be effective for insomnia, no placebo-controlled trials have evaluated their separate and combined effects for sleep-onset insomnia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of behavioral and pharmacological therapy, singly and in combination, for chronic sleep-onset insomnia. Methods This was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that involved 63 young and middle-aged adults with chronic sleep-onset insomnia. Interventions included cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), pharmacotherapy, or combination therapy compared with placebo. The main outcome measures were sleep-onset latency as measured by sleep diaries; secondary measures included sleep diary measures of sleep efficiency and total sleep time, objective measures of sleep variables (Nightcap sleep monitor recorder), and measures of daytime functioning. Results In most measures, CBT was the most sleep effective intervention; it produced the greatest changes in sleep-onset latency and sleep efficiency, yielded the largest number of normal sleepers after treatment, and maintained therapeutic gains at long-term follow-up. The combined treatment provided no advantage over CBT alone, whereas pharmacotherapy produced only moderate improvements during drug administration and returned measures toward baseline after drug use discontinuation. Conclusi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.164.17.1888

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, G. D., Pace-Schott, E. F., Stickgold, R., & Otto, M. W.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2004-09-27
Volume
164
Issue
17
Pages
1888
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172054698
Cited by
579
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 39
FWCI
34.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29hl059387-04)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL59387)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA117440)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
chronic insomnia, sleep onset insomnia, cognitive behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, combination therapy, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, daytime functioning, treatment efficacy, young and middle-aged adults
MeSH terms
Zolpidem, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Pyridines, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review