Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Women's Psychological Experiences in a Narrative Therapy‐Based Group: An Analysis of Participants' Writings and Beck Depression Inventory–Second Edition

Koganei, Kiyoko, Asaoka, Yuki, Nishimatsu, Yoshiko, Kito, Satoshi·2021·Japanese Psychological Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore women's experiences in a narrative therapy‐based group conducted to help participants re‐author their stories. Seven women who were either patients or individuals enrolled in Transition Support for Employment at a psychiatric clinic participated in the meetings, one every fortnight. Each session explored a theme based on narrative therapy techniques such as externalization. The participants wrote their reflections during each session, and completed the Beck Depression Inventory‐Second Edition (BDI‐II) during the initial and final sessions. An affinity diagram was developed to classify their written reflections into 22 lower categories (e.g., new understanding of self, forward‐looking‐understanding of life) and 4 upper categories (“Insight,” “Sharing with others,” “Changes with understanding of lives,” “Higher motivation”). The relationship among five lower categories comprising “Insight” was explored, and it became apparent that clarification of participants' own thoughts about social problems functioned as a mediator promoting the process. The largest portion of depressed feelings emerged during the initial session, and four participants had lower scores for BDI‐II items such as self‐criticism in the final session. The results suggest that the group's purpose was realized. However, future studies should examine participants' feelings more closely, especially during the initial session.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jpr.12326

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Beck A. T., 2003, Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory
  2. Bruner J., 1990, Acts of meaning
  3. Denborough D., 2014, Retelling the stories of our lives: Everyday narrative therapy to draw inspiration and transform experience
  4. Epston D., 1992, Therapy as social construction, 96
  5. Kawakita J., 1967, Abduction: How to develop creativity
  6. Kunishige K., 2013, Narrative conversations: Language, discourse, and agency
  7. Okamoto Y., 1999, Maturity in Relationship
  8. Payne M., 2006, Narrative therapy: An introduction for counselors, 10.4135/9781446213322 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Saito T., 2019, Narrative therapy Japanese standard: “Exploring the theoretical basis.”
  10. White M., 2009, Maps of narrative practice
  11. White M., 2018, Narrative therapy classics
  12. White M., 1990, Narrative means to therapeutic ends

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Koganei, K., Asaoka, Y., Nishimatsu, Y., & Kito, S.
Affiliations
Ai Clinic Kanda
Venue
Japanese Psychological Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-24
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
466-475
ISSN
  • 0021-5368
  • 1468-5884
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review