Cited by 17Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsOral and gingival health research

Azurocidin in gingival crevicular fluid as a potential biomarker of chronic periodontitis

Nalmpantis, Dimitrios, Gatou, Asimina, Fragkioudakis, Ioannis, Margariti, Apostolia, Skoura, Lemonia, Sakellari, Dimitra·2020·Journal of Periodontal Research

Abstract

Background and Objective: Azurocidin is a neutrophil‐derived protein in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) which, according to relevant studies, might correlate with periodontal disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate azurocidin as a potential biomarker for chronic periodontitis. Material and Methods: One hundred and one patients participated in the study, divided into two groups. Forty‐eight were included in the periodontally healthy group (HP) and fifty‐three in the chronic periodontitis group (CP). Clinical indices included probing depth (PD), recession (REC), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque (PL). Pooled GCF samples were collected with paper strips, freezed in liquid nitrogen (−196°C), stored at −80°C, and the levels of azurocidin were analyzed with ELISA. Values were transformed and expressed for comparisons in pg/30 s sample. Statistical comparisons were performed using non‐parametric tests (Mann‐Whitney) at the 0.05 level. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of the procedure was assessed with receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC), areas under the curve (AUC), and the Youden's J Index calculated. Results: Demographic data were comparable between the two groups. Clinical parameters and the levels of azurocidin were statistically significantly higher in the CP group when compared to the HP group (Mann‐Whitney test, P < .05). Quantitative data from ELISA demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy of azurocidin, with AUC calculated higher than 0.9 at the 0.000 level. Conclusion: Azurocidin in GCF is a promising biomarker for periodontal disease. The results of the present study agree with previous studies in the literature showing an up‐regulated trend in the levels of azurocidin in periodontitis patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jre.12703

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nalmpantis, D., Gatou, A., Fragkioudakis, I., Margariti, A., Skoura, L., & Sakellari, D.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Sakellari, Dimitra
Venue
Journal of Periodontal Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-14
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
209-214
ISSN
  • 0022-3484 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0765
OpenAlex
W2979956661
Cited by
17
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontal Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
PlacControl Ltd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Oral and gingival health research
Keywords
heparin-binding protein, gingival crevicular fluid, chronic periodontitis, periodontal biomarkers, diagnostic accuracy, clinical attachment level, probing depth, bleeding on probing, periodontal plaque
MeSH terms
Blood Proteins, Cross-Sectional Studies, Gingival Crevicular Fluid, Humans, Middle Aged, Periodontal Index, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Periodontal Attachment Loss, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides, Chronic Periodontitis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review