Cited by 4Sexual Differentiation and DisordersGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Gene Expression Profile of the Neonatal Female Mouse Brain After Administration of Testosterone Propionate

Nakachi, Yutaka, Iseki, Mioko, Yokoo, Tomotaka, Mizuno, Yosuke, Okazaki, Yasushi·2015·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Clinical care decisions for peripubertal adolescents with gender dysphoria (GD) should be made carefully. Furthermore, the identification of biomarkers is very important for rapid and accurate diagnosis of GD in young people. Aim The aim of this study was to investigate gene expression profiles during masculinization of the neonatal female mouse brain by testosterone and to identify biomarkers related to GD. Methods Microarray analysis was performed using RNAs extracted from the brains of neonatal mice treated by intraperitoneal injection of testosterone propionate during the sexual determination period. Sequence motif enrichment analysis for sex hormone receptor responsive elements was performed for the flanking regions of genes that showed significant expression changes following administration of testosterone propionate. Main outcome measures We revealed a gene set with marked changes in expression during brain masculinization of neonatal female mice following administration of testosterone propionate. Results We identified 334 genes that showed differential expression in the masculinized neonatal female brain after testosterone propionate treatment. Interestingly, most of these genes are not reported to be expressed in a sexually dimorphic manner. Moreover, sequence motif enrichment analysis suggested that masculinization of the neonatal female brain by testosterone was controlled more by estrogen receptors than androgen receptors. Conclusions Differences in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsm.12802

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakachi, Y., Iseki, M., Yokoo, T., Mizuno, Y., & Okazaki, Y.
Affiliations
Saitama Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Nakachi, Yutaka
  • Okazaki, Yasushi
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2015-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
887-896
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2100372788
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kawano Masanori Memorial Public Interest Incorporated Foundation
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
gender dysphoria, brain masculinization, testosterone propionate, gene expression profiling, estrogen receptor, androgen receptor, biomarkers, sexual differentiation of the brain, differential gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Female, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Biomarkers, Gene Expression, Testosterone Propionate, Mice, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review