Cited by 36Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsDupuytren's Contracture and Treatments

Examining Postoperative Outcomes after Employing a Surgical Algorithm for Management of Peyronie's Disease: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review

Papagiannopoulos, Dimitri, Yura, Emily, Levine, Laurence·2015·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Aim Surgery remains the gold standard treatment for men with stable Peyronie's disease (PD). In an attempt to guide operative selection, we report our series of penile-straightening procedures for PD, using a surgical algorithm that recommended tunica albuginea plication (TAP), partial plaque excision and grafting (PEG) or inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. With this study, we attempt to further refine surgical approach, define realistic surgical outcomes, and help establish reasonable postoperative expectations for treatment of PD. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent surgery for PD at our institution between 2007 and 2013. Work-up involved a history, physical exam, and a duplex ultrasound. Several questionnaires were employed to assess bother and distress associated with PD. Objective outcomes and patient satisfaction were assessed postoperatively. Primary outcomes include postoperative patient satisfaction with rigidity, curvature, and ability to engage in intercourse. Secondary outcomes include comparing emotional, relationship, and psychological distress to severity of disease. Results A total of 390 patients underwent penile-straightening procedures for correction of PD. Of these patients, 29%, (n = 114) underwent TAP, 41% (n = 159) PEG, and 30% (N = 114) IPP. Mean follow-up was 17 months. The three surgical modalities showed no significant difference in satisfaction with penile rigidity, presence of bothersome residual curve, or abi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsm.12910

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Levine and Lenting were among the first to describe a surgical algorithm for Peyronie's disease based on curvature severity, indentation or hourglass with hinge-effect, and baseline erectile function.

    “Levine and Lenting were one of the first groups to describe their surgical algorithm for Peyronie’s Disease based on curvature severity, presence of indentation/hourglass with associated hinge-effect, and baseline erectile function.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papagiannopoulos, D., Yura, E., & Levine, L.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Levine, Laurence
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2015-06-01
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1474-1480
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W1910680421
Cited by
36
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
Keywords
Peyronie's disease, surgical algorithm, tunica albuginea plication, inflatable penile prosthesis, penile curvature, penile rigidity, patient satisfaction, psychological distress, postoperative outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Induration, Penis, Postoperative Period, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Penile Prosthesis, Patient Satisfaction, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review