Cited by 59Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Circadian period and the timing of melatonin onset in men and women: predictors of sleep during the weekend and in the laboratory

Lazar, Alpar S., Santhi, Nayantara, Hasan, Sibah, Lo, June C.‐Y., Johnston, Jonathan D., Von Schantz, Malcolm, Archer, Simon N., Dijk, Derk‐Jan·2013·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

Sleep complaints and irregular sleep patterns, such as curtailed sleep during workdays and longer and later sleep during weekends, are common. It is often implied that differences in circadian period and in entrained phase contribute to these patterns, but few data are available. We assessed parameters of the circadian rhythm of melatonin at baseline and in a forced desynchrony protocol in 35 participants (18 women) with no sleep disorders. Circadian period varied between 23 h 50 min and 24 h 31 min, and correlated positively (n = 31, rs = 0.43, P = 0.017) with the timing of the melatonin rhythm relative to habitual bedtime. The phase of the melatonin rhythm correlated with the Insomnia Severity Index (n = 35, rs = 0.47, P = 0.004). Self-reported time in bed during free days also correlated with the timing of the melatonin rhythm (n = 35, rs = 0.43, P = 0.01) as well as with the circadian period (n = 31, rs = 0.47, P = 0.007), such that individuals with a more delayed melatonin rhythm or a longer circadian period reported longer sleep during the weekend. The increase in time in bed during the free days correlated positively with circadian period (n = 31, rs = 0.54, P = 0.002). Polysomnographically assessed latency to persistent sleep (n = 34, rs = 0.48, P = 0.004) correlated with the timing of the melatonin rhythm when participants were sleeping at their habitual bedtimes in the laboratory. This correlation was significantly stronger in women than in men (Z = 2.38, P = 0.017). The findings show that individual differences in circadian period and phase of the melatonin rhythm associate with differences in sleep, and suggest that individuals with a long circadian period may be at risk of developing sleep problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Healthy adults show interindividual differences in the free-running circadian period (tau), which shows robust stability within individuals.

    “Healthy adults show interindividual differences in the free-running circadian period (tau),94–98 which shows robust stability within individuals.97”

    From Circadian rhythms, sleep deprivation, and human performance (2013) · cites this paper as [96]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 59

Authors
Lazar, A. S., Santhi, N., Hasan, S., Lo, J. C. ‐., Johnston, J. D., Von Schantz, M., Archer, S. N., & Dijk, D.
Affiliations
  • Surrey Sleep Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Surrey Guildford UK
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
155-159
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2044390421
Cited by
59
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
BBSRC (BB/F022883/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
circadian period, melatonin onset, melatonin rhythm, circadian entrainment, weekend sleep, time in bed, sleep latency, insomnia severity, sex differences, forced desynchrony, individual differences in sleep
MeSH terms
Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Melatonin, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Sleep, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review