Cited by 90Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Dreaming of a learning task is associated with enhanced memory consolidation: replication in an overnight sleep study

Open access
Wamsley, Erin J., Stickgold, Robert·2019·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

Sleep following learning benefits memory. One model attributes this effect to the iterative "reactivation" of memory traces in the sleeping brain, demonstrated in animal models. Although technical limitations prohibit using the same methods to observe memory reactivation in the human brain, the study of mental activity during sleep provides an alternative method of observing memory activation during sleep. In fact, the content of dream experience may reflect the process of memory reactivation and consolidation in the sleeping brain. In line with this hypothesis, we previously reported that dreaming about a spatial learning task during a nap strongly predicts subsequent performance improvements. Here, we replicate this observation in an overnight sleep study, for the first time demonstrating that pre-sleep training on a virtual maze navigation task is reflected in dreams reported from all phases of sleep, with unambiguous representation of the task in dream content associated with improved next-morning performance. These observations are consistent with reactivation-based models of memory consolidation in sleep, confirming our earlier finding that the cognitive-level activation of recent experience during sleep is associated with subsequent performance gains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12749

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repetitive daily tasks like Tetris can lead to Tetris-inspired dreams, but such inculcated images or sequences do not represent replay, being more hallucinatory and sparse in content and only loosely related to the played game.

    “While there is behavioral evidence that repetitive daily tasks, like having subjects play Tetris for significant periods of time, can lead to Tetris-inspired dreams, such inculcated images or sequences do not represent replay in that they are not veridical repeats of previous games, being more hallucinatory and sparse in content and only being loosely related to the played game”

    From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Introduction reports unambiguous Tetris imagery after play, and the Discussion says maze-related dreams rarely resembled exact replay or rehearsal. But the Introduction explicitly says such reports are not merely weakly related to prior experience, while the Discussion allows that they could reflect neural replay. The copy does not characterize the Tetris imagery as hallucinatory or sparse. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When recent experiences appear in dreams, even in fragmentary form, subsequent memory for those experiences is improved.

    “Importantly, when recent experiences appear in dreams, even in fragmentary form, subsequent memory for those experiences is improved.”

    From Constructive episodic simulation in dreams (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

  • The fact that replay results more often contain never-before-seen patterns indicates that dreaming may play some sort of role in generalization or gist extraction.

    “a fact that, as has been pointed out in the previous literature, indicates that dreaming may play some sort of role in generalization or gist extraction.79”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 90

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wamsley EJ Stickgold R Incorporation of Waking Events into Dreams The Neuroscience of Sleep 330 336 Academic Press London 2009

Authors
Wamsley, E. J., & Stickgold, R.
Affiliations
  • Furman University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wamsley, Erin J.
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-08
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
e12749-e12749
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2886050787
Cited by
90
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH048832, MH098171)
  • Mind Science Foundation (Tom Slick Research Award)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
dream content, memory consolidation, memory reactivation, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, spatial learning, nocturnal sleep, NAP, dream recall
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adult, Animals, Dreams, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Sleep, Polysomnography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review