Cited by 21Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersMemory and Neural Mechanisms

RETRACTED: The impact of acoustic stimulation during sleep on memory and sleep architecture: A meta‐analysis

Stanyer, Emily C., Baniqued, Paul Dominick E., Awais, Muhammad, Kouara, Layla, Davies, Andrew G., Killan, Edward C., Mushtaq, Faisal·2022·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

The relationship between sleep and cognition has long been recognized, with slow-wave sleep thought to play a critical role in long-term memory consolidation. Recent research has presented the possibility that non-invasive acoustic stimulation during sleep could enhance memory consolidation. Herein, we report a random-effects model meta-analysis examining the impact of this intervention on memory and sleep architecture in healthy adults. Sixteen studies were identified through a systematic search. We found a medium significant effect of acoustic stimulation on memory task performance (g = 0.68, p = .031) in young adults 35 years of age (g = -0.83, p = .223). In young adults, there was a large statistically significant effect for declarative memory tasks (g = 0.87, p = .014) but no effect for non-declarative tasks (g = -0.25, p = .357). There were no statistically significant differences in polysomnography-derived sleep architecture values between sham and stimulation conditions in either young or older adults. Based on these results, it appears that acoustic stimulation during sleep may only be an effective intervention for declarative memory consolidation in young adults. However, the small number of studies in this area, their small sample sizes, the short-term nature of most investigations and the high between-studies heterogeneity highlight a need for high-powered and long-term experiments to better elucidate, and subsequently maximise, any potential benefits of this nove…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.13385This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Stanyer, E. C., Baniqued, P. D. E., Awais, M., Kouara, L., Davies, A. G., Killan, E. C., & Mushtaq, F.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Mushtaq, Faisal
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-30
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
e13385-e13385
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W3215305358
Cited by
21
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alan Turing Institute
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
memory consolidation, slow-wave sleep, sleep architecture, declarative memory, implicit memory, age differences, young adults, sham stimulation, retracted article
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Sleep, Slow-Wave, Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aged, Humans, Sleep, Polysomnography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review