The use and efficacy of adaptive servo‐ventilation
Open accessAbstract
1.16 -2.36) of using more settling intervention strategies on a consistent basis; each one-unit increase in consistent strategy use was associated with a significant (p < .001)3.3% decrease in children's difficulties with sleep self-regulation at 3.5 years of age.Further analyses indicated that these outcomes were not moderated by baseline characteristics.Discussion: Infant sleep self-settling is a possible early marker for imprinting good-self-regulatory behaviours.These results highlight that an important factor influencing children's ability to self-regulate sleep at 3.5 years of age is the consistency with which parents implement appropriate bedtime strategies in infancy.Whether these early parenting practices around sleep influence other self-regulatory behaviours is yet to be determined.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a limited body of literature supporting the use of adaptive servo-ventilation in cases of persistent treatment-emergent central sleep apnea.
“However, there is a limited body of literature to support its use in cases of persistent treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA).1047–1055”
From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1050]
The Abstract says little is known about ASV in forms of central sleep apnoea other than the specified heart-failure population, and identifies CPAP-emergent central sleep apnoea as a common indication for ASV in its cohort. It reports better outcomes on ASV than CPAP among patients who tried both, but does not separately establish those outcomes for persistent treatment-emergent cases. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Chang, J. L., Goldberg, A. N., Alt, J. A., Mohammed, A., Ashbrook, L., Auckley, D., Ayappa, I., Bakhtiar, H., Barrera, J. E., Bartley, B. L., et al. (2023) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.23079 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
- Venue
- Journal of Sleep Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 69-69
- ISSN
- 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2869
- OpenAlex
- W4244378498
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Keywords
- adaptive servo-ventilation, infant sleep, children's sleep
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
