Cited by 25Animal Ecology and Behavior StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Urban Lifestyle Supports Larger Red Foxes in Australia: An Investigation into the Morphology of an Invasive Predator

Stepkovitch, B., Martin, J. M., Dickman, C. R., Welbergen, J. A.·2019·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Adult body size, mass and condition predict reproductive success and survival, and hence fitness, in mammals and many other animals. Here, we assessed morphological variation and body condition in populations of the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) along an urban to natural land use gradient in the Sydney region, Australia. The red fox was introduced into Australia in the mid‐19th century and is a recent but successful urban adapter as well as a highly effective predator of naïve native species. As the red fox has successfully invaded urban environments in many parts of the world where it readily exploits anthropogenic sources of food, we hypothesized that individuals should be larger and in better condition in urban than in natural habitats. We found that individuals ( N = 135) of both sexes had larger body mass and skeletal measurements in urban than in more natural habitats; body condition, by contrast, showed no consistent variation. Thus, the urban environment of Sydney provides conditions that favour an increase in size in red foxes so that individuals are now larger than, but in similar body condition as, their non‐urban counterparts. Increased body size and mass may enable red foxes to hunt a broader array of prey species, and as such would be of added concern for the management of native wildlife in Australia's urban environments, a possibility that warrants further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jzo.12723

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Foxes in urban Sydney grow larger and are heavier than foxes in rural areas.

    “Foxes in urban Sydney grow larger and are heavier than foxes in rural areas (Stepkovitch et al. 2019), and there may be an advantage to consuming anthropogenic food sources for overall condition and pathogen resistance.”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Stepkovitch et al. 2019

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stepkovitch, B., Martin, J. M., Dickman, C. R., & Welbergen, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Stepkovitch, B.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-22
Volume
309
Issue
4
Pages
287-294
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W2969596049
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sydney Coastal Councils Group
  • Sydney region Councils
  • private landholders and National Parks
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
red fox, urbanization, body size, body condition, invasive predators, morphological variation, urban adaptation, land use gradient, Sydney

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review