Urban Lifestyle Supports Larger Red Foxes in Australia: An Investigation into the Morphology of an Invasive Predator
Abstract
Adult body size, mass and condition predict reproductive success and survival, and hence fitness, in mammals and many other animals. Here, we assessed morphological variation and body condition in populations of the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) along an urban to natural land use gradient in the Sydney region, Australia. The red fox was introduced into Australia in the mid‐19th century and is a recent but successful urban adapter as well as a highly effective predator of naïve native species. As the red fox has successfully invaded urban environments in many parts of the world where it readily exploits anthropogenic sources of food, we hypothesized that individuals should be larger and in better condition in urban than in natural habitats. We found that individuals ( N = 135) of both sexes had larger body mass and skeletal measurements in urban than in more natural habitats; body condition, by contrast, showed no consistent variation. Thus, the urban environment of Sydney provides conditions that favour an increase in size in red foxes so that individuals are now larger than, but in similar body condition as, their non‐urban counterparts. Increased body size and mass may enable red foxes to hunt a broader array of prey species, and as such would be of added concern for the management of native wildlife in Australia's urban environments, a possibility that warrants further investigation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Foxes in urban Sydney grow larger and are heavier than foxes in rural areas.
“Foxes in urban Sydney grow larger and are heavier than foxes in rural areas (Stepkovitch et al. 2019), and there may be an advantage to consuming anthropogenic food sources for overall condition and pathogen resistance.”
From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Stepkovitch et al. 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variation in red fox <i>Vulpes vulpes</i> diet in five continents
Castañeda, I., Doherty, T. S., Fleming, P. A., Stobo‐Wilson, A. M., Woinarski, J. C. Z., & Newsome, T. M. (2022) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12292 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes
Campbell, S. J., Ashley, W., Gil-Fernandez, M., Newsome, T. M., Di Giallonardo, F., Ortiz-Baez, A. S., Mahar, J. E., Towerton, A. L., Gillings, M., Holmes, E. C., et al. (2020) · Virus Evolution · doi:10.1093/ve/veaa065 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stepkovitch, B., Martin, J. M., Dickman, C. R., & Welbergen, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Stepkovitch, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-22
- Volume
- 309
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 287-294
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W2969596049
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Sydney Coastal Councils Group
- Sydney region Councils
- private landholders and National Parks
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- red fox, urbanization, body size, body condition, invasive predators, morphological variation, urban adaptation, land use gradient, Sydney
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review