The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Morphological evidence that the molecularly determined Ciona intestinalis type A and type B are different species:Ciona robusta and Ciona intestinalis
Open accessAbstract
Ciona intestinalis is considered a widespread and easily recognizable tunicate, the sister group of vertebrates. In recent years, molecular studies suggested that C. intestinalis includes at least two cryptic species, named ‘type A’ and ‘type B’, morphologically indistinguishable. It is dramatic to certify that two different species may be hidden under the name of a species widely used as a model species in biological researches. This raised the problem of identifying diagnostic morphological characters capable of distinguishing these types. We compared the morphology of specimens belonging to the two types and found that only type A specimens possess tunic tubercular prominences, allowing unambiguous discrimination. Remarkably, these structures were already described as distinctive of the Japanese species Ciona robusta, Hoshino and Tokioka, 1967; later synonymized under C. intestinalis (sensu Millar, 1953). In this study, we have confirmed that C. intestinalis type A corresponds to C. robusta. Based on the geographic distribution of C. intestinalis type B, and considering that the original C. intestinalis species was described from North European waters, we determined that C. intestinalis type B corresponds to C. intestinalis as described by Millar in 1953 and possibly to Linnaeus' Ascidia intestinalis L., 1767 for which we have deposited a neotype (from Roscoff, France) and for which we retain the name Ciona intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1767).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
The Draft Genome of Ciona intestinalis : Insights into Chordate and Vertebrate Origins
Dehal, P., Satou, Y., Campbell, R. K., Chapman, J., Degnan, B., De Tomaso, A., Davidson, B., Di Gregorio, A., Gelpke, M., Goodstein, D. M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1080049 · Cited by 1,641 · cited 1×
“This promoted the study of this organism and helped to clarify the evolutionary origin of chordate novelties (Dehal et al. 2002).”
Cited by
Bouchemousse, S., Bishop, J. D. D., & Viard, F. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24875 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunetti, R., Gissi, C., Pennati, R., Caicci, F., Gasparini, F., & Manni, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-15
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 186-193
- ISSN
- 0947-5745 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1599318981
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphological evidence that the molecularly determined Ciona intestinalis type A and type B are different species:Ciona robusta and Ciona intestinalis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jzs.12101
- The paper
- Brunetti, R., Gissi, C., Pennati, R., Caicci, F., Gasparini, F., & Manni, L. (2015). Morphological evidence that the molecularly determined Ciona intestinalis type A and type B are different species:Ciona robusta and Ciona intestinalis. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.