The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Writing Behaviors and Linguistic Complexity
Abstract
This study investigated whether task complexity influences second language (L2) writers’ fluency, pausing, and revision behaviors and the cognitive processes underlying these behaviors; whether task complexity affects linguistic complexity of written output; and whether relationships between writing behaviors and linguistic complexity are moderated by task complexity. Participants were 73 advanced L2 writers, who completed simple or complex essay tasks. Task complexity was operationalized as the absence versus presence of content support. Participants’ writing behaviors were recorded via keystroke logging software. Four writers, drawn from groups performing simple and complex tasks, additionally engaged in stimulated recall. Content support was found to lead to less pausing, more revision, and increased linguistic complexity. When content support was absent, more frequent pauses and revisions were associated with less sophisticated lexis. These results, combined with stimulated recall comments, suggest that content support likely reduced processing burden on planning processes, facilitating attention to linguistic encoding. Open Practices: This article has been awarded an Open Materials badge. All materials are publicly accessible in the IRIS digital repository at http://www.iris-database.org. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.42.2.381 · Cited by 905
Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for academic purposes programme.
Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, J. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.004 · Cited by 209
Self-citationKeystroke Analysis: Reflections on Procedures and Measures
Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & de Glopper, K. (2012) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088312451108 · Cited by 124
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1093/applin/ams073 · DOI
- Brown J. D., 2002, An investigation of second language task‐based performance assessment
- Brunfaut T., 2015, Looking into test‐takers’ cognitive processes whilst completing reading tasks: A mixed‐method eye‐tracking and stimulated recall study, ARAGs Research Reports Online
- 10.1075/lllt.32.02bul · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/tblt.7 · DOI
- 10.2307/3587951 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0142716412000069 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203796580 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263104026130 · DOI · Paper page
- Ishikawa T., 2007, Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 136
- 10.1075/sibil.47 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.355 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.355 · Paper page
- 10.2307/1423213 · DOI · Paper page
- Kellogg R. T., 1996, The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications, 57
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00695.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1515/iral.2007.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0741088313491692 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/tblt.7 · DOI
- Malvern D. D., 1997, Evolving models of language, 58
- 10.1075/tblt.7 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch21 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/amp044 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/lang.12079 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/applin/amt039 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/tblt.2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/tblt.7 · DOI
- Schilperoord J., 1996, It's about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production, 10.1163/9789004458598 · DOI
- 10.21832/9781847691859-007 · DOI
- Skehan P., 1998, A cognitive approach to language learning
- 10.1075/tblt.5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/136216880000400203 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00140.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1075/tblt.7 · DOI
- 10.1111/0026-7902.00059.2000 · doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00059.2000
- Tillema M., 2012, Writing in first and second language: Empirical studies on text quality and writing processes
- den Bergh H, 1994, Writing: Current trends in European research, 133
- 10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012 · DOI
- Wengelin A., 2006, Computer keystroke logging and writing: Methods and applications, 107, 10.1163/9780080460932_008 · DOI
Cited by
Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs
Abrams, Z. I. (2019) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44681 · Cited by 124
A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Spector, J. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6 · Cited by 47
On the role of engagement in automated feedback effectiveness: Insights from keystroke logging
Schiller, R., Fleckenstein, J., Höft, L., Horbach, A., & Meyer, J. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105386 · Cited by 14
Ink and algorithm: Exploring temporal dynamics in generative AI ‐assisted writing
Yang, K., Cheng, Y., Zhao, L., Raković, M., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70031 · Cited by 22
L2 language development in oral and written modalities
Son, M. (2024) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263124000329 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-08-28
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 208-241
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2513078611
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 38.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- Trinity College London
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Writing Behaviors and Linguistic Complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/lang.12205
- The paper
- Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Writing Behaviors and Linguistic Complexity. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.