Cited by 79Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

Setanaxib, a first‐in‐class selective NADPH oxidase 1/4 inhibitor for primary biliary cholangitis: A randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 trial

Open access
Invernizzi, Pietro, Carbone, Marco, Jones, David, Levy, Cynthia, Little, Nicola, Wiesel, Philippe, Nevens, Frederik, the study investigators·2023·Liver International

Abstract

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare liver disease with significant unmet need for second‐line/add‐on treatments. Setanaxib, a NOX1/4 inhibitor, has shown anti‐fibrotic effects in in vitro and animal studies. This phase 2, randomized, multicentre study investigated the efficacy and safety of setanaxib in patients with PBC. Methods: Patients with ≥6 months of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment were randomized 1:1:1 to oral setanaxib 400 mg once daily (OD), twice daily (BID), or placebo, in addition to UDCA for 24 weeks. Other inclusion criteria included alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥1.5 × ULN and gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) ≥1.5 × ULN. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in GGT at Week 24; secondary endpoints included change from baseline in ALP, liver stiffness (LS; via transient elastography), fatigue at Week 24, and safety outcomes. p values compare setanaxib 400 mg BID and placebo groups. Results: Of patients randomized (setanaxib 400 mg OD and BID: 38, and 36; placebo: 37), 104/111 completed Week 24. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in GGT to Week 24 was −4.9% (59.6%) for setanaxib 400 mg OD, −19.0% (28.9%) for setanaxib 400 mg BID, and −8.4% (21.5%) for placebo; p = .31. Patients treated with setanaxib 400 mg OD and BID showed decreased serum ALP levels from baseline to Week 24 ( p = .002: setanaxib BID versus placebo). Patients treated with setanaxib 400 mg OD and BID showed mean (SD) percentage increases in LS to Week 24 of 3.3% (35.0%) and 7.9% (43.7%), versus 10.1% (33.1%) for placebo ( p = .65). Changes in mean (SD) PBC‐40 fatigue domain scores to Week 24 were +0.3% (24.9%) for setanaxib 400 mg OD, −9.9% (19.8%) for setanaxib 400 mg BID and +2.4% (23.1%) for placebo, p = .027. Two patients (one placebo, one setanaxib 400 mg BID) experienced serious treatment‐emergent adverse events, deemed unrelated to study drug. Conclusions: The primary endpoint was not met. However, the secondary endpoints provide preliminary evidence for potential anti‐cholestatic and anti‐fibrotic effects in PBC, supporting the further evaluation of setanaxib in a future phase 2b/3 trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/liv.15596

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a phase 2 study of setanaxib, after 24 weeks, changes in the PBC-40 fatigue domain score were +2.4 for placebo, +0.3 for setanaxib 400 mg daily, and -9.9 for 400 mg twice daily (p=0.027).

    “After 24 weeks of treatment, the changes in the primary biliary cholangitis with a -40 fatigue domain score were encouraging: +2•4 for placebo, +0•3 for setanaxib 400 mg daily, and -9•9 for 400 mg twice daily groups (p=0•027).116,117”

    From Primary biliary cholangitis. (2024) · cites this paper as [116]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Invernizzi, P., Carbone, M., Jones, D., Levy, C., Little, N., Wiesel, P., Nevens, F., & the study investigators
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Calliditas Therapeutics AB (Sweden) (SE)
  • Genkyotex (Switzerland) (CH)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Invernizzi, Pietro
Venue
Liver International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-05-15
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
1507-1522
ISSN
  • 0106-9543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-3223
  • 1478-3231
OpenAlex
W4376629896
Cited by
79
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Liver International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR200243, NF-SI-0513-10091)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, ursodeoxycholic acid, liver fibrosis, liver stiffness, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, fatigue, antifibrotic therapy, second-line therapy, drug safety, dose comparison
MeSH terms
NADPH Oxidase 1, Alkaline Phosphatase, Animals, gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Pyridones, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Treatment Outcome, Pyrazolones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review