Cited by 7Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMarine animal studies overviewWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Acoustic ecology of terrestrial mammals: a new Signaller–Receiver Conceptual Framework

Stein, Rachel M., Rachlow, Janet L.·2023·Mammal Review

Abstract

Mammals use sound for a variety of purposes, such as detecting the presence of others and maintaining social bonds. Much research on mammalian acoustics has been focussed on marine mammals and bats; less has considered terrestrial species. Our goal was to review knowledge about the role of acoustics in the behaviour and ecology of terrestrial mammals and to develop a conceptual framework that contextualises the knowledge. The purpose of the framework was to enable researchers to place their work in a broader understanding of the acoustics of terrestrial mammals, as well as to support them to articulate and explore new questions. We conducted a keyword search in Web of Science and removed papers that did not meet our criteria, resulting in 228 reviewed papers. We scored these for keywords and used concept maps to identify broad patterns. Of the 228 papers, 219 were focussed on acoustic communication. We therefore structured our Signaller–Receiver Conceptual Framework around factors that influence signallers (i.e. mammals producing sound) and receivers (i.e. mammals receiving sound). Factors that influence signallers were placed into two categories – those that influence call emission and those that influence call structure. Factors that influence receivers also fell into two categories – those that influence detection of sound and those that influence responses to sound. We added an additional receiver category – responses to sound. We present the framework in terms of five types of factors (environmental, social, morphological and physiological, state‐related factors, and other) and how they influence both signallers and receivers. Our review is the first to detail the range of factors influencing acoustic ecology of terrestrial mammals, and our framework provides context for the articulation of hypotheses that integrate multiple factors, and so can help researchers place their work in a broader context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mam.12314

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The design of acoustic communication reflects energetic costs, body-size constraints, and sensory limitations, and sexual selection can drive signal divergence and speciation.

    “Its design reflects energetic costs, body-size constraints, and sensory limitations, and sexual selection can even drive signal divergence and speciation”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, R. M., & Rachlow, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Idaho (US)
Corresponding author
Stein, Rachel M.
Venue
Mammal Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-14
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
143-157
ISSN
  • 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2907
OpenAlex
W4324138511
Cited by
7
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mammal Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
Idaho Space Grant Consortium
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
acoustic ecology, terrestrial mammals, acoustic communication, vocal behavior, call structure, acoustic detection, social behavior, environmental factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review