Cited by 27Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing Communities

Group cell phones are feasible and acceptable for promoting optimal breastfeeding practices in a women's microcredit program in Nigeria

Open access
Flax, Valerie L., Ibrahim, Alawiyatu Usman, Negerie, Mekebeb, Yakubu, Danjuma, Leatherman, Sheila, Bentley, Margaret E.·2017·Maternal & Child Nutrition

Abstract

As part of a breastfeeding promotion intervention trial in Nigeria, we provided one cell phone per group of 5–7 microcredit clients and instructed the group's cell phone recipient to share weekly breastfeeding voice and text messages with group members. We measured the feasibility and acceptability of using group cell phones by conducting semi‐structured exit interviews with 195 microcredit clients whose babies were born during the intervention (target group), in‐depth interviews with eight phone recipients and nine non‐phone recipients, and 16 focus group discussions with other microcredit clients. Women in the target group said the group phone worked well or very well (64%). They were motivated to try the recommended practices because they trusted the information (58%) and had support from others (35%). Approximately 44% of target women reported that their groups met and shared messages at least once a week. Women in groups that met at least weekly had higher odds of exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.6, 19.7) than women in groups that never met. In‐depth interviews and focus group discussions indicated that non‐phone recipients had positive feelings towards phone recipients, the group phone met participants' needs, and messages were often shared outside the group. In conclusion, group cell phone messaging to promote breastfeeding among microcredit clients is feasible and acceptable and can be part of an effective behaviour change package.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mcn.12261

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flax, V. L., Ibrahim, A. U., Negerie, M., Yakubu, D., Leatherman, S., & Bentley, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Primary Health Care Department Bauchi Local Government Bauchi Nigeria
  • Partners for Development Silver Spring Maryland USA
  • Partners for Development Bauchi Nigeria
Venue
Maternal & Child Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-18
Volume
13
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1740-8695 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-8709
OpenAlex
W2297271167
Cited by
27
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
mobile health messaging, breastfeeding promotion, exclusive breastfeeding, women's microfinance, behavior change, feasibility and acceptability, group messaging, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, Educational Status, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Middle Aged, Nigeria, Cluster Analysis, Focus Groups, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review