A qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and knowledge of maternal obesity: Reflecting on their experiences of providing healthy eating and weight management advice to pregnant women
Open accessAbstract
Midwives are responsible for providing advice regarding the complex issues of healthy eating and weight management during pregnancy. This study utilised an inductive data‐driven thematic approach in order to determine midwives' perceptions, knowledge, and experiences of providing healthy eating and weight management advice to pregnant women. Semistructured interviews with 17 midwives were transcribed verbatim and data subjected to thematic analysis. The findings offer insight into the challenges facing midwives in their role trying to promote healthy eating and appropriate weight management to pregnant women. Three core themes were identified: (a) “If they eat healthily it will bring their weight down”: Midwives Misunderstood; (b) “I don't think we are experienced enough”: Midwives Lack Resources and Expertise; and (c) “BMI of 32 wouldn't bother me”: Midwives Normalised Obesity. The midwives recognised the importance of providing healthy eating advice to pregnant women and the health risks associated with poor diet and obesity. However, they reported the normalisation of obesity in pregnant women and suggested that this, together with their high workload and lack of expertise, explained the reasons why systematic advice was not in standard antenatal care. In addition, the current lack of UK clinical guidance, and thus, possibly lack of clinical leadership are also preventing delivery of tailored advice. Implementation literature on understanding the barriers to optimal health care delivery and informing clinical practice through research evidence needs to be further investigated in this field. This study has recommendations for policy makers, commissioners, service providers, and midwives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the absence of regular weighing, high levels of overweight in society may normalise the appearance of obesity, meaning that midwives fail to recognise women who may need intervention.
“In the absence of regular weighing, it is also possible that the high levels of overweight in society may normalise the appearance of obesity, meaning that midwives fail to recognise women who may need intervention. 118”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
Midwives suffer from a lack of clear clinical guidelines that could enable referral to suitable personalised interventions.
“They also suffer from a lack of clear clinical guidelines that could enable referral to suitable personalised interventions. 118”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
With high workloads and time pressure, it can be difficult to maintain an awareness of unconscious bias around obese women and implement personal strategies to overcome that bias.
“and, with high workloads and time pressure, it can be difficult to maintain an awareness of unconscious bias around obese women and implement personal strategies to overcome that bias. 117 , 118”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · see citing works
Baker, R., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., Gillies, C., Shaw, E. J., Cheater, F., Flottorp, S., & Robertson, N. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005470.pub2 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
The use of theory in health behavior research from 2000 to 2005: a systematic review
Painter, J. E., Borba, C. P. C., Hynes, M., Mays, D., & Glanz, K. (2008) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9042-y · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Grounded theory research: literature reviewing and reflexivity
McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. (2007) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04436.x · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Antenatal weight management: Diet, physical activity, and gestational weight gain in early pregnancy
Swift, J. A., Langley-Evans, S. C., Pearce, J., Jethwa, P. H., Taylor, M. A., Avery, A., Ellis, S., McMullen, S., & Elliott-Sale, K. J. (2017) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.016 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Langley‐Evans, S. C., Pearce, J., & Ellis, S. (2022) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.12999 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
The role of midwives and obstetrical nurses in the promotion of healthy lifestyle during pregnancy
Bahri Khomami, M., Walker, R., Kilpatrick, M., de Jersey, S., Skouteris, H., & Moran, L. J. (2021) · Therapeutic Advances in Reproductive Health · doi:10.1177/26334941211031866 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Adherence to Mediterranean Diet and Its Association with Maternal and Newborn Outcomes
Di Renzo, L., Marchetti, M., Rizzo, G., Gualtieri, P., Monsignore, D., Dominici, F., Mappa, I., Cavicchioni, O., Aguzzoli, L., De Lorenzo, A., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19148497 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCann, M. T., Newson, L., Burden, C., Rooney, J. S., Charnley, M. S., & Abayomi, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Ulster (GB)
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- Venue
- Maternal & Child Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09-25
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e12520-e12520
- ISSN
- 1740-8695 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-8709
- PMC
- PMC6866163
- OpenAlex
- W2760775285
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Maternal and Child Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
- Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Liverpool John Moores University (D221003)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- maternal obesity, midwives' perceptions, midwife knowledge, dietary recommendations, prenatal care, pregnant women, clinical guidance, barriers to care delivery
- MeSH terms
- Body Weight Maintenance, Obesity Management, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Maternal Health Services, Midwifery, Nurse Midwives, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review