Cited by 55Obesity and Health PracticesMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

A qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and knowledge of maternal obesity: Reflecting on their experiences of providing healthy eating and weight management advice to pregnant women

Open access
McCann, Mary T., Newson, Lisa, Burden, Catriona, Rooney, Jane S., Charnley, Margaret S., Abayomi, Julie C.·2018·Maternal & Child Nutrition

Abstract

Midwives are responsible for providing advice regarding the complex issues of healthy eating and weight management during pregnancy. This study utilised an inductive data‐driven thematic approach in order to determine midwives' perceptions, knowledge, and experiences of providing healthy eating and weight management advice to pregnant women. Semistructured interviews with 17 midwives were transcribed verbatim and data subjected to thematic analysis. The findings offer insight into the challenges facing midwives in their role trying to promote healthy eating and appropriate weight management to pregnant women. Three core themes were identified: (a) “If they eat healthily it will bring their weight down”: Midwives Misunderstood; (b) “I don't think we are experienced enough”: Midwives Lack Resources and Expertise; and (c) “BMI of 32 wouldn't bother me”: Midwives Normalised Obesity. The midwives recognised the importance of providing healthy eating advice to pregnant women and the health risks associated with poor diet and obesity. However, they reported the normalisation of obesity in pregnant women and suggested that this, together with their high workload and lack of expertise, explained the reasons why systematic advice was not in standard antenatal care. In addition, the current lack of UK clinical guidance, and thus, possibly lack of clinical leadership are also preventing delivery of tailored advice. Implementation literature on understanding the barriers to optimal health care delivery and informing clinical practice through research evidence needs to be further investigated in this field. This study has recommendations for policy makers, commissioners, service providers, and midwives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mcn.12520

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCann, M. T., Newson, L., Burden, C., Rooney, J. S., Charnley, M. S., & Abayomi, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Venue
Maternal & Child Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-25
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
e12520-e12520
ISSN
  • 1740-8695 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-8709
OpenAlex
W2760775285
Cited by
55
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Liverpool John Moores University (D221003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
maternal obesity, midwives' perceptions, midwife knowledge, dietary recommendations, prenatal care, pregnant women, clinical guidance, barriers to care delivery
MeSH terms
Body Weight Maintenance, Obesity Management, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Maternal Health Services, Midwifery, Nurse Midwives, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review