The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation
Abstract
Adaptive genetic variation has been thought to originate primarily from either new mutation or standing variation. Another potential source of adaptive variation is adaptive variants from other (donor) species that are introgressed into the (recipient) species, termed adaptive introgression. Here, the various attributes of these three potential sources of adaptive variation are compared. For example, the rate of adaptive change is generally thought to be faster from standing variation, slower from mutation and potentially intermediate from adaptive introgression. Additionally, the higher initial frequency of adaptive variation from standing variation and lower initial frequency from mutation might result in a higher probability of fixation of the adaptive variants for standing variation. Adaptive variation from introgression might have higher initial frequency than new adaptive mutations but lower than that from standing variation, again making the impact of adaptive introgression variation potentially intermediate. Adaptive introgressive variants might have multiple changes within a gene and affect multiple loci, an advantage also potentially found for adaptive standing variation but not for new adaptive mutants. The processes that might produce a common variant in two taxa, convergence, trans‐species polymorphism from incomplete lineage sorting or from balancing selection and adaptive introgression, are also compared. Finally, potential examples of adaptive introgression in animals, including balancing selection for multiple alleles for major histocompatibility complex ( MHC ), S and csd genes, pesticide resistance in mice, black colour in wolves and white colour in coyotes, N eanderthal or D enisovan ancestry in humans, mimicry genes in H eliconius butterflies, beak traits in D arwin's finches, yellow skin in chickens and non‐native ancestry in an endangered native salamander, are examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194
Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia
Reich, D., Green, R. E., Kircher, M., Krause, J., Patterson, N., Durand, E. Y., Viola, B., Briggs, A. W., Stenzel, U., Johnson, P. L. F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09710 · Cited by 1,991
The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet
Axelsson, E., Ratnakumar, A., Arendt, M.-L., Maqbool, K., Webster, M. T., Perloski, M., Liberg, O., Arnemo, J. M., Hedhammar, Å., & Lindblad-Toh, K. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11837 · Cited by 963
Kawecki, T. J., Lenski, R. E., Ebert, D., Hollis, B., Olivieri, I., & Whitlock, M. C. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.06.001 · Cited by 807
Genetic restoration of the Florida panther
Johnson, W. E., Onorato, D. P., Roelke, M. E., Land, E. D., Cunningham, M., Belden, R. C., McBride, R., Jansen, D., Lotz, M., Shindle, D., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192891 · Cited by 659
Molecular and Evolutionary History of Melanism in North American Gray Wolves
Anderson, T. M., vonHoldt, B. M., Candille, S. I., Musiani, M., Greco, C., Stahler, D. R., Smith, D. W., Padhukasahasram, B., Randi, E., Leonard, J. A., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165448 · Cited by 416
Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers
Hedrick, P. W., & Fredrickson, R. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-009-9999-5 · Cited by 361
Self-citationDistinguishing between selective sweeps from standing variation and from a de novo mutation
Peter, B. M., Huerta-Sanchez, E., & Nielsen, R. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003011 · Cited by 193
Brockerville, R. M., McGrath, M. J., Pilgrim, B. L., & Marshall, H. D. (2013) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-012-9443-x · Cited by 17 · cited 2×
“Brockerville et al. (2013) found that a recessive allele at the Mc1r locus was responsible for the white colour and that this allele is the same as found in some dog breeds, such as the golden and Labrador retrievers.”
Background
Cited by
The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance
Hawkins, N. J., Bass, C., Dixon, A., & Neve, P. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12440 · Cited by 836
Whiteley, A. R., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Funk, W. C., & Tallmon, D. A. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.009 · Cited by 813
Hybridization, Introgression, and the Nature of Species Boundaries
(2014) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esu033 · Cited by 745
Insights from genomes into the evolutionary importance and prevalence of hybridization in nature
Taylor, S. A., & Larson, E. L. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0777-y · Cited by 593
Mallet, J., Besansky, N., & Hahn, M. W. (2016) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201500149 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedrick, P. W.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4606-4618
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2021736445
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 28.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.