The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a unified paradigm for sequence‐based identification of fungi
Open accessAbstract
The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is the formal fungal barcode and in most cases the marker of choice for the exploration of fungal diversity in environmental samples. Two problems are particularly acute in the pursuit of satisfactory taxonomic assignment of newly generated ITS sequences: (i) the lack of an inclusive, reliable public reference data set and (ii) the lack of means to refer to fungal species, for which no Latin name is available in a standardized stable way. Here, we report on progress in these regards through further development of the UNITE database (http://unite.ut.ee) for molecular identification of fungi. All fungal species represented by at least two ITS sequences in the international nucleotide sequence databases are now given a unique, stable name of the accession number type (e.g. H ymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus|GU 586904|SH 133781.05 FU), and their taxonomic and ecological annotations were corrected as far as possible through a distributed, third‐party annotation effort. We introduce the term ‘species hypothesis’ (SH) for the taxa discovered in clustering on different similarity thresholds (97–99%). An automatically or manually designated sequence is chosen to represent each such SH. These reference sequences are released (http://unite.ut.ee/repository.php) for use by the scientific community in, for example, local sequence similarity searches and in the QIIME pipeline. The system and the data will be updated automatically as the number of public fungal ITS sequences grows. We invite everybody in the position to improve the annotation or metadata associated with their particular fungal lineages of expertise to do so through the new Web‐based sequence management system in UNITE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4137/EBO.S6271 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fbr.2011.10.003 · DOI
- BatesST AhrendtS BikHet al. (2013).Meeting report: Fungal ITS workshop (October 2012). Standards in Genomic Sciences 8: 1 (doi:10.4056/sigs.3737409). · DOI
- 10.1126/science.319.5870.1616a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3732/ajb.1000298 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2005.1725 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04855.x · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/13.9.3021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03024.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrmicro2942 · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2942
- 10.1016/j.fbr.2011.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1631/jzus.B0860004 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01376.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0953756204000310 · doi:10.1017/s0953756204000310
- 10.1111/nph.12243 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000059 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3897/mycokeys.4.3606 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.funeco.2012.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00645.x · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00645.x
- 10.1186/1471-2148-8-50 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1117018109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05538.x · DOI · Paper page
- Sokal RR, 1963, Principles of Numerical Taxonomy
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0024940 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.funeco.2013.03.004 · doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2013.03.004
Cited by
FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild
Nguyen, N. H., Song, Z., Bates, S. T., Branco, S., Tedersoo, L., Menke, J., Schilling, J. S., & Kennedy, P. G. (2016) · Fungal Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006 · Cited by 4,530
Self-citationHardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,708
Hu, L., Robert, C. A. M., Cadot, S., Zhang, X., Ye, M., Li, B., Manzo, D., Chervet, N., Steinger, T., van der Heijden, M. G. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05122-7 · Cited by 1,626
Lamas, B., Richard, M. L., Leducq, V., Pham, H.-P., Michel, M.-L., Da Costa, G., Bridonneau, C., Jegou, S., Hoffmann, T. W., Natividad, J. M., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4102 · Cited by 1,482
Banerjee, S., Walder, F., Büchi, L., Meyer, M., Held, A. Y., Gattinger, A., Keller, T., Charles, R., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2019) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0383-2 · Cited by 1,356
Metadata
- Authors
- Kõljalg, U., Nilsson, R. H., Abarenkov, K., Tedersoo, L., Taylor, A. F. S., Bahram, M., Bates, S. T., Bruns, T. D., Bengtsson‐Palme, J., Callaghan, T. M., Douglas, B., Drenkhan, T., Eberhardt, U., Dueñas, M., Grebenc, T., Griffith, G. W., Hartmann, M., Kirk, P. M., Kohout, P., Larsson, E., Lindahl, B. D., Lücking, R., Martín, M. P., Matheny, P. B., Nguyen, N. H., Niskanen, T., Oja, J., Peay, K. G., Peintner, U., Peterson, M., Põldmaa, K., Saag, L., Saar, I., Schüßler, A., Scott, J. A., Senés, C., Smith, M. E., Suija, A., Taylor, D. L., Telleria, M. T., Weiss, M., & Larsson, K.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09-24
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 5271-5277
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2160947363
- Cited by
- 3,586
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 154.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 707 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.