Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,586

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a unified paradigm for sequence‐based identification of fungi

Open access
Kõljalg, Urmas, Nilsson, R. Henrik, Abarenkov, Kessy, Tedersoo, Leho, Taylor, Andy F. S., Bahram, Mohammad, Bates, Scott T., Bruns, Thomas D., Bengtsson‐Palme, Johan, Callaghan, Tony M., Douglas, Brian, Drenkhan, Tiia, Eberhardt, Ursula, Dueñas, Margarita, Grebenc, Tine, Griffith, Gareth W., Hartmann, Martin, Kirk, Paul M., Kohout, Petr, Larsson, Ellen, Lindahl, Björn D., Lücking, Robert, Martín, María P., Matheny, P. Brandon, Nguyen, Nhu H., Niskanen, Tuula, Oja, Jane, Peay, Kabir G., Peintner, Ursula, Peterson, Marko, Põldmaa, Kadri, Saag, Lauri, Saar, Irja, Schüßler, Arthur, Scott, James A., Senés, Carolina, Smith, Matthew E., Suija, Ave, Taylor, D. Lee, Telleria, M. Teresa, Weiss, Michael, Larsson, Karl‐Henrik·2013·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is the formal fungal barcode and in most cases the marker of choice for the exploration of fungal diversity in environmental samples. Two problems are particularly acute in the pursuit of satisfactory taxonomic assignment of newly generated ITS sequences: (i) the lack of an inclusive, reliable public reference data set and (ii) the lack of means to refer to fungal species, for which no Latin name is available in a standardized stable way. Here, we report on progress in these regards through further development of the UNITE database (http://unite.ut.ee) for molecular identification of fungi. All fungal species represented by at least two ITS sequences in the international nucleotide sequence databases are now given a unique, stable name of the accession number type (e.g. H ymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus|GU 586904|SH 133781.05 FU), and their taxonomic and ecological annotations were corrected as far as possible through a distributed, third‐party annotation effort. We introduce the term ‘species hypothesis’ (SH) for the taxa discovered in clustering on different similarity thresholds (97–99%). An automatically or manually designated sequence is chosen to represent each such SH. These reference sequences are released (http://unite.ut.ee/repository.php) for use by the scientific community in, for example, local sequence similarity searches and in the QIIME pipeline. The system and the data will be updated automatically as the number of public fungal ITS sequences grows. We invite everybody in the position to improve the annotation or metadata associated with their particular fungal lineages of expertise to do so through the new Web‐based sequence management system in UNITE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mec.12481

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.4137/EBO.S6271 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.fbr.2011.10.003 · DOI
  4. BatesST AhrendtS BikHet al. (2013).Meeting report: Fungal ITS workshop (October 2012). Standards in Genomic Sciences 8: 1 (doi:10.4056/sigs.3737409). · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.319.5870.1616a · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3732/ajb.1000298 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1725 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04855.x · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/13.9.3021 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03024.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nrmicro2942 · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2942
  13. 10.1016/j.fbr.2011.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1631/jzus.B0860004 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01376.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1017/S0953756204000310 · doi:10.1017/s0953756204000310
  17. 10.1111/nph.12243 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000059 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.3897/mycokeys.4.3606 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.funeco.2012.04.004 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00645.x · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00645.x
  22. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-50 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1117018109 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05538.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Sokal RR, 1963, Principles of Numerical Taxonomy
  27. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024940 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.funeco.2013.03.004 · doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2013.03.004

Cited by

See all 3,586

Metadata

Authors
Kõljalg, U., Nilsson, R. H., Abarenkov, K., Tedersoo, L., Taylor, A. F. S., Bahram, M., Bates, S. T., Bruns, T. D., Bengtsson‐Palme, J., Callaghan, T. M., Douglas, B., Drenkhan, T., Eberhardt, U., Dueñas, M., Grebenc, T., Griffith, G. W., Hartmann, M., Kirk, P. M., Kohout, P., Larsson, E., Lindahl, B. D., Lücking, R., Martín, M. P., Matheny, P. B., Nguyen, N. H., Niskanen, T., Oja, J., Peay, K. G., Peintner, U., Peterson, M., Põldmaa, K., Saag, L., Saar, I., Schüßler, A., Scott, J. A., Senés, C., Smith, M. E., Suija, A., Taylor, D. L., Telleria, M. T., Weiss, M., & Larsson, K.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-24
Volume
22
Issue
21
Pages
5271-5277
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2160947363
Cited by
3,586
References
1
FWCI
154.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.