The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical models of the influence of genomic architecture on the dynamics of speciation
Abstract
A long‐standing problem in evolutionary biology has been determining whether and how gradual, incremental changes at the gene level can account for rapid speciation and bursts of adaptive radiation. Using genome‐scale computer simulations, we extend previous theory showing how gradual adaptive change can generate nonlinear population transitions, resulting in the rapid formation of new, reproductively isolated species. We show that these transitions occur via a mechanism rooted in a basic property of biological heredity: the organization of genes in genomes. Genomic organization of genes facilitates two processes: (i) the build‐up of statistical associations among large numbers of genes and (ii) the action of divergent selection on persistent combinations of alleles. When a population has accumulated a critical amount of standing, divergently selected variation, the combination of these two processes allows many mutations of small effect to act synergistically and precipitously split one population into two discontinuous, reproductively isolated groups. Periods of allopatry, chromosomal linkage among loci, and large‐effect alleles can facilitate this process under some conditions, but are not required for it. Our results complement and extend existing theory on alternative stable states during population divergence, distinct phases of speciation and the rapid emergence of multilocus barriers to gene flow. The results are thus a step towards aligning population genomic theory with modern empirical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457
Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation
Kirkpatrick, M., & Barton, N. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.047985 · Cited by 1,178
Cited by
Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation
Wolf, J. B. W., & Ellegren, H. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.133 · Cited by 441
Recombination rate variation shapes barriers to introgression across butterfly genomes
Martin, S. H., Davey, J. W., Salazar, C., & Jiggins, C. D. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006288 · Cited by 320
Local Adaptation by Alleles of Small Effect
Yeaman, S. (2015) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/682405 · Cited by 298
Determining epistatic selection in admixed populations
Schumer, M., & Brandvain, Y. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13641 · Cited by 57
Speciation with gene flow between two Neotropical sympatric species (Pitcairnia spp.: Bromeliaceae)
Tavares, M. M., Ferro, M., Leal, B. S. S., & Palma‐Silva, C. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8834 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Flaxman, S. M., Wacholder, A. C., Feder, J. L., & Nosil, P.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4074-4088
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1997415473
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical models of the influence of genomic architecture on the dynamics of speciation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.12750
- The paper
- Flaxman, S. M., Wacholder, A. C., Feder, J. L., & Nosil, P. (2014). Theoretical models of the influence of genomic architecture on the dynamics of speciation. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12750
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.