The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying the core microbial community in the gut of fungus‐growing termites
Open accessAbstract
Gut microbes play a crucial role in decomposing lignocellulose to fuel termite societies, with protists in the lower termites and prokaryotes in the higher termites providing these services. However, a single basal subfamily of the higher termites, the Macrotermitinae, also domesticated a plant biomass‐degrading fungus (Termitomyces), and how this symbiont acquisition has affected the fungus‐growing termite gut microbiota has remained unclear. The objective of our study was to compare the intestinal bacterial communities of five genera (nine species) of fungus‐growing termites to establish whether or not an ancestral core microbiota has been maintained and characterizes extant lineages. Using 454‐pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, we show that gut communities have representatives of 26 bacterial phyla and are dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, Proteobacteria and Synergistetes. A set of 42 genus‐level taxa was present in all termite species and accounted for 56–68% of the species‐specific reads. Gut communities of termites from the same genus were more similar than distantly related species, suggesting that phylogenetic ancestry matters, possibly in connection with specific termite genus‐level ecological niches. Finally, we show that gut communities of fungus‐growing termites are similar to cockroaches, both at the bacterial phylum level and in a comparison of the core Macrotermitinae taxa abundances with representative cockroach, lower termite and higher nonfungus‐growing termites. These results suggest that the obligate association with Termitomyces has forced the bacterial gut communities of the fungus‐growing termites towards a relatively uniform composition with higher similarity to their omnivorous relatives than to more closely related termites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and Within Humans
Muegge, B. D., Kuczynski, J., Knights, D., Clemente, J. C., González, A., Fontana, L., Henrissat, B., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198719 · Cited by 1,988
A Core Human Microbiome as Viewed through 16S rRNA Sequence Clusters
Huse, S. M., Ye, Y., Zhou, Y., & Fodor, A. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034242 · Cited by 572
Cited by
Gut Microbiotas and Host Evolution: Scaling Up Symbiosis
Shapira, M. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.006 · Cited by 448
Rubino, F., Carberry, C., Waters, S. M., Kenny, D., McCabe, M. S., & Creevey, C. J. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.172 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Otani, S., Mikaelyan, A., Nobre, T., Hansen, L. H., Koné, N. A., Sørensen, S. J., Aanen, D. K., Boomsma, J. J., Brune, A., & Poulsen, M.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-27
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4631-4644
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2142276222
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying the core microbial community in the gut of fungus‐growing termites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.12874
- The paper
- Otani, S., Mikaelyan, A., Nobre, T., Hansen, L. H., Koné, N. A., Sørensen, S. J., Aanen, D. K., Boomsma, J. J., Brune, A., & Poulsen, M. (2014). Identifying the core microbial community in the gut of fungus‐growing termites. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.