Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identifying the core microbial community in the gut of fungus‐growing termites

Open access
Otani, Saria, Mikaelyan, Aram, Nobre, Tânia, Hansen, Lars H., Koné, N'Golo A., Sørensen, Søren J., Aanen, Duur K., Boomsma, Jacobus J., Brune, Andreas, Poulsen, Michael·2014·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Gut microbes play a crucial role in decomposing lignocellulose to fuel termite societies, with protists in the lower termites and prokaryotes in the higher termites providing these services. However, a single basal subfamily of the higher termites, the Macrotermitinae, also domesticated a plant biomass‐degrading fungus (Termitomyces), and how this symbiont acquisition has affected the fungus‐growing termite gut microbiota has remained unclear. The objective of our study was to compare the intestinal bacterial communities of five genera (nine species) of fungus‐growing termites to establish whether or not an ancestral core microbiota has been maintained and characterizes extant lineages. Using 454‐pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, we show that gut communities have representatives of 26 bacterial phyla and are dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, Proteobacteria and Synergistetes. A set of 42 genus‐level taxa was present in all termite species and accounted for 56–68% of the species‐specific reads. Gut communities of termites from the same genus were more similar than distantly related species, suggesting that phylogenetic ancestry matters, possibly in connection with specific termite genus‐level ecological niches. Finally, we show that gut communities of fungus‐growing termites are similar to cockroaches, both at the bacterial phylum level and in a comparison of the core Macrotermitinae taxa abundances with representative cockroach, lower termite and higher nonfungus‐growing termites. These results suggest that the obligate association with Termitomyces has forced the bacterial gut communities of the fungus‐growing termites towards a relatively uniform composition with higher similarity to their omnivorous relatives than to more closely related termites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mec.12874

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Otani, S., Mikaelyan, A., Nobre, T., Hansen, L. H., Koné, N. A., Sørensen, S. J., Aanen, D. K., Boomsma, J. J., Brune, A., & Poulsen, M.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-27
Volume
23
Issue
18
Pages
4631-4644
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2142276222
Cited by
159
References
2
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying the core microbial community in the gut of fungus‐growing termites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.12874
The paper
Otani, S., Mikaelyan, A., Nobre, T., Hansen, L. H., Koné, N. A., Sørensen, S. J., Aanen, D. K., Boomsma, J. J., Brune, A., & Poulsen, M. (2014). Identifying the core microbial community in the gut of fungus‐growing termites. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12874

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.