The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta‐analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow
Abstract
Many species have fragmented distribution with small isolated populations suffering inbreeding depression and/or reduced ability to evolve. Without gene flow from another population within the species (genetic rescue), these populations are likely to be extirpated. However, there have been only ~ 20 published cases of such outcrossing for conservation purposes, probably a very low proportion of populations that would potentially benefit. As one impediment to genetic rescues is the lack of an overview of the magnitude and consistency of genetic rescue effects in wild species, I carried out a meta‐analysis. Outcrossing of inbred populations resulted in beneficial effects in 92.9% of 156 cases screened as having a low risk of outbreeding depression. The median increase in composite fitness (combined fecundity and survival) following outcrossing was 148% in stressful environments and 45% in benign ones. Fitness benefits also increased significantly with maternal Δ F (reduction in inbreeding coefficient due to gene flow) and for naturally outbreeding versus inbreeding species. However, benefits did not differ significantly among invertebrates, vertebrates and plants. Evolutionary potential for fitness characters in inbred populations also benefited from gene flow. There are no scientific impediments to the widespread use of outcrossing to genetically rescue inbred populations of naturally outbreeding species, provided potential crosses have a low risk of outbreeding depression. I provide revised guidelines for the management of genetic rescue attempts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution
(2013) · doi:10.1515/9781400846184 · Cited by 1,183
Whiteley, A. R., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Funk, W. C., & Tallmon, D. A. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.009 · Cited by 813
Genetic restoration of the Florida panther
Johnson, W. E., Onorato, D. P., Roelke, M. E., Land, E. D., Cunningham, M., Belden, R. C., McBride, R., Jansen, D., Lotz, M., Shindle, D., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192891 · Cited by 659
Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers
Hedrick, P. W., & Fredrickson, R. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-009-9999-5 · Cited by 361
Cited by
Todesco, M., Pascual, M. A., Owens, G. L., Ostevik, K. L., Moyers, B. T., Hübner, S., Heredia, S. M., Hahn, M. A., Caseys, C., Bock, D. G., et al. (2016) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12367 · Cited by 867
Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management
Hohenlohe, P. A., Funk, W. C., & Rajora, O. P. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15720 · Cited by 702
Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue
Hedrick, P. W., & Garcia-Dorado, A. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005 · Cited by 668
Call for a Paradigm Shift in the Genetic Management of Fragmented Populations
Ralls, K., Ballou, J. D., Dudash, M. R., Eldridge, M. D. B., Fenster, C. B., Lacy, R. C., Sunnucks, P., & Frankham, R. (2018) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12412 · Cited by 518
Self-citationGenetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals
Bertorelle, G., Raffini, F., Bosse, M., Bortoluzzi, C., Iannucci, A., Trucchi, E., Morales, H. E., & van Oosterhout, C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00448-x · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Frankham, R.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-23
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2610-2618
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2038282357
- Cited by
- 876
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 43.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta‐analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.13139
- The paper
- Frankham, R. (2015). Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta‐analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.