Cited by 702Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management

Open access
Hohenlohe, Paul A., Funk, W. Chris, Rajora, Om P.·2021·Molecular Ecology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Biodiversity is under threat worldwide. Over the past decade, the field of population genomics has developed across nonmodel organisms, and the results of this research have begun to be applied in conservation and management of wildlife species. Genomics tools can provide precise estimates of basic features of wildlife populations, such as effective population size, inbreeding, demographic history and population structure, that are critical for conservation efforts. Moreover, population genomics studies can identify particular genetic loci and variants responsible for inbreeding depression or adaptation to changing environments, allowing for conservation efforts to estimate the capacity of populations to evolve and adapt in response to environmental change and to manage for adaptive variation. While connections from basic research to applied wildlife conservation have been slow to develop, these connections are increasingly strengthening. Here we review the primary areas in which population genomics approaches can be applied to wildlife conservation and management, highlight examples of how they have been used, and provide recommendations for building on the progress that has been made in this field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mec.15720

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-quality reference genome assemblies are increasingly recognized as an important foundation of conservation genomics.

    “High-quality reference genome assemblies are increasingly recognized as an important foundation of conservation genomics84–91.”

    From Chromosomal-level reference genome assembly of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) from Banks Island in the Canadian Arctic, a resource for conservation genomics (2024) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Introduction (‘Applications to wildlife’; page not provided) says reference genome assemblies are increasingly available and enable analyses that would otherwise be impossible. ‘Approaches in population genomics’ calls their contribution integral to a genomics study. The paper supports their importance, but these passages do not specifically address the claim’s high-quality qualifier. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Arctic conservation management can be complex with intersecting and conflicting environmental, cultural and socioeconomic issues.

    “Arctic conservation management can be complex with intersecting and at times conflicting environmental, cultural and socioeconomic issues90,168,169.”

    From Chromosomal-level reference genome assembly of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) from Banks Island in the Canadian Arctic, a resource for conservation genomics (2024) · cites this paper as [90]

    The “Informing Management Actions” section (page unavailable) says wildlife managers face difficult management decisions, supporting the general point that conservation management can be complex. It does not address Arctic management or say that environmental, cultural and socioeconomic issues intersect or conflict. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rajora, O. P. (2019). Population Genomics: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hohenlohe, P. A., Funk, W. C., & Rajora, O. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
Corresponding author
Hohenlohe, Paul A.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-18
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
62-82
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W3095529345
Cited by
702
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 137 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
population genomics, wildlife conservation, wildlife management, effective population size, inbreeding, demographic history, population structure, inbreeding depression, adaptation to environmental change, adaptive genetic variation, non-model organisms
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Wild, Conservation of Natural Resources, Genetics, Population, Biodiversity, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review