The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speaking up in defence of teamwork training towards patient safety: a response
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two articles provided counterpoints to the argument that groupthink is harmful in health care.
“Two articles provided counterpoints to the argument that groupthink is harmful in health care (Kerry et al., 2017; Madigosky & van Schaik, 2016).”
From Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as Kerry et al., 2017
Two included articles argued that health care is inherently collaborative and the concern for groupthink is outweighed by the benefits of teamwork in health care.
“Furthermore, health care is inherently collaborative and the concern for groupthink is outweighed by the benefits of teamwork in health care.”
From Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as Kerry et al., 2017
Two included articles argued that health professional teams may not be subject to groupthink due to their heterogeneity in perspectives, experiences, and roles.
“Health professional teams may not be subject to groupthink due to their heterogeneity in perspectives, experiences, and roles.”
From Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as Kerry et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Aldag, R. J., & Fuller, S. R. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.533 · Cited by 306
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review
DiPierro, K., Lee, H., Pain, K. J., Durning, S. J., & Choi, J. J. (2022) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1987404 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerry, M. J., Schmutz, J. B., & Eppich, W. J.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kerry, Matthew J
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 561-562
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2586832666
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- team training, patient safety, teamwork, patient safety education
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Patient Care Team, Organizational Culture, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
