CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50Railway Engineering and DynamicsStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisVibration Control and Rheological Fluids

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Passive and Adaptive Damping Systems for Vibration Mitigation and Increased Fatigue Service Life of a Tied Arch Railway Bridge

Open access
Andersson, Andreas, O'Connor, Alan, Karoumi, Raid·2015·Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
DOI 10.1111/mice.12116
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article, the use of external damping systems for vibration mitigation of railway bridge dynamics is studied. For a presented case study bridge, the performance of different tuned mass damper systems (TMDs) is studied. During train passage, the change in dynamic characteristics of the bridge may produce a significant detune to a passive TMD. Therefore, routines for a variable stiffness TMD using incremental frequency estimates are developed. Based on numerical simulations, the cumulative fatigue damage is calculated for different damper systems. Due to resonant behavior, the results are found to highly depend on the train speed. Based on an assumed probability density function for the train speed, fragility curves are produced to express the probability of fatigue failure as a function of the number of train passages.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mice.12116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Adeli, 2004, Wavelet‐hybrid feedback‐least mean square algorithm for robust control of structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 128, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(128) · DOI
  2. Aldemir, 2012, Control of structural response under earthquake excitation, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27, 620, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00776.x · DOI
  3. Amini, 2013, Wavelet PSO‐based LQR algorithm for optimal structural control using active tuned mass dampers, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28, 542, 10.1111/mice.12017 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Amini, 2014, A wavelet‐based adaptive pole assignment method for structural control, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29, 464, 10.1111/mice.12072 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Andersson, A. & Malm, R. (2004), Measurement evaluation and FEM simulation of bridge dynamics. MSc thesis, Royal Institute of Technology.
  6. Banerjee, 2007, Nonlinear static procedure for seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22, 293, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00486.x · DOI
  7. Brock, 1946, A note on the damped vibration absorber, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 68, A
  8. Casciati, 2009, Performance of multi‐TMD in the towers of suspension bridges, Journal of Vibration and Control, 15, 821, 10.1177/1077546308091455 · DOI
  9. Gutierrez Soto, 2013, Tuned mass dampers, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 20, 419, 10.1007/s11831-013-9091-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gutierrez Soto, 2013, Placement of control devices for passive, semi‐active, and active, vibration control of structures, Scientia Iranica – Transaction A: Civil Engineering, 20, 1567
  11. Hunt, 1982, The broadband dynamic vibration absorber, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 83, 573, 10.1016/S0022-460X(82)80108-9 · DOI
  12. Hwang, 1990, Probabilistic damage analysis of structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 116, 1992, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:7(1992) · DOI
  13. Igusa, 1994, Vibration control using multiple tuned mass dampers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 175, 491, 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1341 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kim, 2005, Hybrid control of smart structures using a novel wavelet‐based algorithm, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20, 7, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00373.x · DOI
  15. Kim, 2005, Wavelet‐hybrid feedback linear mean squared algorithm for robust control of cable‐stayed bridges, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10, 116, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:2(116) · DOI
  16. Kim, 2005, Hybrid control of irregular steel highrise building structures under seismic excitations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 63, 1757, 10.1002/nme.1336 · DOI
  17. Leander, 2010, Monitoring and enhanced fatigue evaluation of a steel railway bridge, Engineering Structures, 32, 854, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.011 · DOI
  18. Malm, 2006, Field testing and simulation of dynamic properties of a tied arch railway bridge, Engineering Structures, 28, 143, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.011 · DOI
  19. Maynet, 2002, Incorporation of seismic considerations in bridge management systems, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17, 185, 10.1111/1467-8667.00266 · DOI
  20. Miner, 1945, Cumulative damage in fatigue, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12, 159, 10.1115/1.4009458 · DOI
  21. Nagarajaiah, 2009, Adaptive, passive, semiactive, smart tuned mass dampers: identification and control using empirical mode decomposition, Hilbert transform, and short‐term Fourier transform, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 16, 800, 10.1002/stc.349 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Nigdeli, 2013, Active tendon control of torsionally irregular structures under near‐fault ground motion excitation, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28, 718, 10.1111/mice.12046 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ormondroyd, 1928, The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber, Transactions of the ASME, 50, 9
  24. Palmgren, 1924, Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern, VDI Zeitschrift, 68, 339
  25. Rychlik, 1987, A new definition of the rainflow cycle counting method, International Journal of Fatigue, 9, 119, 10.1016/0142-1123(87)90054-5 · DOI
  26. Soom, 1983, Optimal design of linear and nonlinear vibration absorbers for damped systems, Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design, 105, 112, 10.1115/1.3269054 · DOI
  27. Sun, 1995, Passive, adaptive and active tuned vibration absorbers – a survey, Transactions of the ASME, 117, 234, 10.1115/1.2836462 · DOI
  28. Torbol, 2013, Fragility analysis of highway bridges based on long‐term monitoring data, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28, 178, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00805.x · DOI
  29. Tsai, 1994, Explicit formulae for optimum absorber parameters for force‐excited and viscously damped systems, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 176, 585, 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1400 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Andersson, A., O'Connor, A., & Karoumi, R.
Affiliations
  • Swedish Transport Administration (SE)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
ORCID
Venue
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
748-757
ISSN
1093-9687 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/mice.12116
OpenAlex
W2127655141
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Commission (IAPP-GA-2011-286276)
  • Swedish Transport Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Railway Engineering and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Keywords
tuned mass damper, passive damping, adaptive damping, tied arch bridge, railway bridges, vibration suppression, fatigue damage, train speed, detuning, fragility curves, fatigue failure probability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review