The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated Pixel‐Level Pavement Crack Detection on 3D Asphalt Surfaces Using a Deep‐Learning Network
Open accessAbstract
The CrackNet, an efficient architecture based on the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), is proposed in this article for automated pavement crack detection on 3D asphalt surfaces with explicit objective of pixel‐perfect accuracy. Unlike the commonly used CNN, CrackNet does not have any pooling layers which downsize the outputs of previous layers. CrackNet fundamentally ensures pixel‐perfect accuracy using the newly developed technique of invariant image width and height through all layers. CrackNet consists of five layers and includes more than one million parameters that are trained in the learning process. The input data of the CrackNet are feature maps generated by the feature extractor using the proposed line filters with various orientations, widths, and lengths. The output of CrackNet is the set of predicted class scores for all pixels. The hidden layers of CrackNet are convolutional layers and fully connected layers. CrackNet is trained with 1,800 3D pavement images and is then demonstrated to be successful in detecting cracks under various conditions using another set of 200 3D pavement images. The experiment using the 200 testing 3D images showed that CrackNet can achieve high Precision (90.13%), Recall (87.63%) and F‐measure (88.86%) simultaneously. Compared with recently developed crack detection methods based on traditional machine learning and imaging algorithms, the CrackNet significantly outperforms the traditional approaches in terms of F‐measure. Using parallel computing techniques, CrackNet is programmed to be efficiently used in conjunction with the data collection software.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net
Springenberg, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T., & Riedmiller, M. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6806 · Cited by 3,447
Multi-column deep neural network for traffic sign classification
Cireşan, D., Meier, U., Masci, J., & Schmidhuber, J. (2012) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2012.02.023 · Cited by 1,057
Cited by
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517 · Cited by 1,336
Machine learning in materials science
Wei, J., Chu, X., Sun, X., Xu, K., Deng, H., Chen, J., Wei, Z., & Lei, M. (2019) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12028 · Cited by 1,069
Baduge, S. K., Thilakarathna, S., Perera, J. S., Arashpour, M., Sharafi, P., Teodosio, B., Shringi, A., & Mendis, P. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104440 · Cited by 1,007
“Current crack detection algorithms in use, such as CrackNET [208], CrackNETR [209], UNET [210], etc. have various reported drawbacks when used in real-world applications due to demanding situations such as weather, temperature, camera position, and quality, shadow, and light, and so on.”
MethodDorafshan, S., Thomas, R. J., & Maguire, M. (2018) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.011 · Cited by 774
Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A., & Pekcan, G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102778 · Cited by 769
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, A., Wang, K. C. P., Li, B., Yang, E., Dai, X., Peng, Y., Fei, Y., Liu, Y., Li, J. Q., & Chen, C.
- Venue
- Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08-21
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 805-819
- ISSN
- 1093-9687 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8667
- OpenAlex
- W2748643398
- Cited by
- 969
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 75.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated Pixel‐Level Pavement Crack Detection on 3D Asphalt Surfaces Using a Deep‐Learning Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mice.12297
- The paper
- Zhang, A., Wang, K. C. P., Li, B., Yang, E., Dai, X., Peng, Y., Fei, Y., Liu, Y., Li, J. Q., & Chen, C. (2017). Automated Pixel‐Level Pavement Crack Detection on 3D Asphalt Surfaces Using a Deep‐Learning Network. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.