The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated pavement crack detection and segmentation based on two‐step convolutional neural network
Open accessAbstract
Cracking is a common pavement distress that would cause further severe problems if not repaired timely, which means that it is important to accurately extract the information of pavement cracks through detection and segmentation. Automated pavement crack detection and segmentation using deep learning are more efficient and accurate than conventional methods, which could be further improved. While many existing studies have utilized deep learning in pavement crack segmentation, which segments cracks from non‐crack regions, few studies have taken the exact pavement crack detection into account, which identifies cracks in the images from other objects. A two‐step pavement crack detection and segmentation method based on convolutional neural network was proposed in this paper. An automated pavement crack detection algorithm was developed using the modified You Only Look Once 3rd version in the first step. The proposed crack segmentation method in the second step was based on the modified U‐Net, whose encoder was replaced with a pre‐trained ResNet‐34 and the up‐sample part was added with spatial and channel squeeze and excitation (SCSE) modules. Proposed method combines pavement crack detection and segmentation together, so that the detected cracks from the first step are segmented in the second step to improve the accuracy. A dataset of pavement crack images in different circumstances were also built for the study. The F1 score of proposed crack detection and segmentation methods are 90.58% and 95.75%, respectively, which are higher than other state‐of‐the‐art methods. Compared with existing one‐step pavement crack detection or segmentation methods, proposed two‐step method showed advantages of accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger
Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.690 · Cited by 19,892
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networks
Smith, L. N. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv.2017.58 · Cited by 2,670
Cited by
Structural crack detection using deep convolutional neural networks
Ali, R., Chuah, J. H., Talip, M. S. A., Mokhtar, N., & Shoaib, M. A. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103989 · Cited by 369
Federated learning–based global road damage detection
Saha, P. K., Arya, D., & Sekimoto, Y. (2024) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.13186 · Cited by 37
Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification
Arafin, P., Issa, A., & Billah, A. H. M. M. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22228714 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Yang, X., Lau, S., Wang, X., Luo, S., Lee, V. C., & Ding, L.
- Venue
- Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09-17
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1291-1305
- ISSN
- 1093-9687 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8667
- OpenAlex
- W3087277009
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 26.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated pavement crack detection and segmentation based on two‐step convolutional neural network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mice.12622
- The paper
- Liu, J., Yang, X., Lau, S., Wang, X., Luo, S., Lee, V. C., & Ding, L. (2020). Automated pavement crack detection and segmentation based on two‐step convolutional neural network. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12622
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.