Cited by 48Mental Health and PsychiatryHallucinations in medical conditionsSchizophrenia research and treatment

On the Distinction between Monothematic and Polythematic Delusions

Coltheart, Max·2013·Mind & Language

Abstract

Some delusional patients exhibit only a single delusional belief (or several delusional beliefs concerning a single theme): this is monothematic delusion. It contrasts with polythematic delusion, where the patient exhibits a variety of delusions concerning a variety of different themes. The neuropsychological bases of various monothematic delusions are rather well understood, and there is a well‐worked‐out general neuropsychological theory of monothematic delusion, the two‐factor theory. Whether polythematic delusion might be explained in a similar way is an open question: I sketch some possible ways in which a comparable two‐factor account might be developed for polythematic (‘psychiatric’) delusional conditions such as delusions of reference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mila.12011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delusions exist on a spectrum and may be monothematic or polythematic.

    “delusions exist on a spectrum (Kingdon & Turkington, 1994) and may be monothematic (concerning a single theme) or polythematic (concerning various themes, e.g., feeling persecuted, on a divine mission, etc.) (Coltheart, 2013).”

    From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Coltheart, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coltheart, M.
Affiliations
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (AU)
Corresponding author
Coltheart, Max
Venue
Mind & Language
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
103-112
ISSN
  • 0268-1064 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0017
OpenAlex
W2136210770
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
29.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mind & Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
delusions of reference, Herzberg's two-factor theory, delusional disorder, delusions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review