Cited by 63Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmotions and Moral BehaviorGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Grief and the Unity of Emotion

Open access
Ratcliffe, Matthew·2017·Midwest Studies In Philosophy

Abstract

The nature of grief presents a particular challenge to the view that emotions are unified psychological states.Grief can include all manner of potential ingredients, changes markedly over time, and has temporal gaps.In this paper, I focus exclusively on the relevant phenomenology and show how an experience of grief still amounts to a unified whole.I begin by endorsing the view that grief is a temporally extended process rather than an episode or state.I go on to argue that what unifies this process and singles it out as one of grieving is not -as has been suggested-its narrative structure.Rather, various aspects of grief all involve recognizing and responding to a wide-ranging, dynamic, and singular disturbance of life-possibilities, where recognition and response are inextricable from each other.This disturbance is 'held together' by relationships of non-propositional implication.I suggest that the same approach can be applied to emotions more generally.that emotions are judgments turns out to be trivially true.Scarantino (2010) therefore objects to what he calls the "elastic strategy": we stretch 'judgment' as much as we need to, until it fits around emotion.When stretched that much, it also encompasses the 'feelings' that others contrast with 'judgments'.Consequently, we fail to distinguish between importantly different aspects of emotion.If we instead acknowledge their distinctness and concede that emotions incorporate both, and perhaps a lot more besides, we are left wit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/misp.12071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grief has significant cognitive content based on recognition of a specific loss and desire for a continued relationship with the loved one, and it is a moral emotion in the sense that a grieving person often thinks of themselves as morally bound to the memory of the loved one.

    “Moreover, grief has a significant cognitive content in that it is based on the recognition of a specific loss and the desire for a continued relationship with the loved one (Gustafson, 1989;Ratcliffe, 2017).Also, it is a moral emotion in the sense that a grieving person often thinks of themselves as morally bound to the memory of the loved one (McCracken, 2005).”

    From The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition (2021) · cites this paper as Ratcliffe, 2017

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 63

Authors
Ratcliffe, M.
Corresponding author
Ratcliffe, Matthew
Venue
Midwest Studies In Philosophy
Published
2017-09
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
154-174
ISSN
0363-6550 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758550905
Cited by
63
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Midwest Studies in Philosophy (publishedVersion)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
grief, narrative structure, phenomenology of emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review