Cited by 42Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsProtein Structure and Dynamics

From substrate specificity to promiscuity: hybrid ABC transporters for osmoprotectants.

Open access
Teichmann, Laura, Chen, Chiliang, Hoffmann, Tamara, Smits, Sander H.J., Schmitt, Lutz, Bremer, Erhard·2017·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: The ABC‐transporters OpuB and OpuC from Bacillus subtilis function as osmoprotectant import systems. Their structural genes have most likely evolved through a duplication event but the two transporters are remarkably different in their substrate profile. OpuB possesses narrow substrate specificity, while OpuC is promiscuous. We assessed the functionality of hybrids between these two ABC‐transporters by reciprocally exchanging the coding regions for the OpuBC and OpuCC substrate‐binding proteins between the corresponding opuB and opuC operons. Substantiating the critical role of the binding protein in setting the substrate specificity of ABC transporters, OpuB::OpuCC turned into a promiscuous system, while OpuC::OpuBC now exhibited narrow substrate specificity. Both hybrid transporters possessed a high affinity for their substrates but the transport capacity of the OpuB::OpuCC system was moderate due to the synthesis of only low amounts of the xenogenetic OpuCC protein. Suppressor mutations causing single amino acid substitutions in the GbsR repressor controlling the choline to glycine betaine biosynthesis pathway greatly improved OpuB::OpuCC‐mediated compatible solute import through transcriptional up‐regulation of the hybrid opuB::opuCC operon. Collectively, we demonstrate for the first time that one can synthetically switch the substrate specificity of a given ABC transporter by combining its core components with a xenogenetic ligand‐binding protein.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mmi.13660

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teichmann, L., Chen, C., Hoffmann, T., Smits, S. H. J., Schmitt, L., & Bremer, E.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Bremer, Erhard
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-22
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
761-780
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2592532660
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Philipps-Universität Marburg
  • Zentrum für Synthetische Mikrobiologie
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
ABC transporters, Bacillus subtilis, osmolytes, substrate specificity, substrate-binding protein, gene duplication, choline biosynthesis, glycine betaine biosynthesis, transcriptional regulation, suppressor mutations
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Bacillus subtilis, Bacterial Proteins, Betaine, Choline, Operon, Substrate Specificity, Transcription, Genetic, Up-Regulation, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Amino Acid Motifs, Osmoregulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review