The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social behaviours by Bacillus subtilis: quorum sensing, kin discrimination and beyond
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Here, we review the multiple mechanisms that the Gram‐positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis uses to allow it to communicate between cells and establish community structures. The modes of action that are used are highly varied and include routes that sense pheromone levels during quorum sensing and control gene regulation, the intimate coupling of cells via nanotubes to share cytoplasmic contents, and long‐range electrical signalling to couple metabolic processes both within and between biofilms. We explore the ability of B. subtilis to detect ‘kin’ (and ‘cheater cells’) by looking at the mechanisms used to potentially ensure beneficial sharing (or limit exploitation) of extracellular ‘public goods’. Finally, reflecting on the array of methods that a single bacterium has at its disposal to ensure maximal benefit for its progeny, we highlight that a large future challenge will be integrating how these systems interact in mixed‐species communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
Kunst, F., Ogasawara, N., Moszer, I., Albertini, A. M., Alloni, G., Azevedo, V., Bertero, M. G., Bessières, P., Bolotin, A., Borchert, S., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36786 · Cited by 3,679
Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis
Branda, S. S., González-Pastor, J. E., Ben-Yehuda, S., Losick, R., & Kolter, R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.191384198 · Cited by 1,129
Cited by
Responses of microorganisms to osmotic stress.
Bremer, E., & Krämer, R. (2019) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115504 · Cited by 463
Bacillus subtilis impact on plant growth, soil health and environment: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
Mahapatra, S., Yadav, R., & Ramakrishna, W. (2022) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.15480 · Cited by 285
Deciphering the quorum-sensing lexicon of the gut microbiota
Oliveira, R. A., Cabral, V., Torcato, I., & Xavier, K. B. (2023) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2023.03.015 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalamara, M., Spacapan, M., Mandic‐Mulec, I., & Stanley‐Wall, N. R.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 863-878
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2892170270
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social behaviours by Bacillus subtilis: quorum sensing, kin discrimination and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mmi.14127
- The paper
- Kalamara, M., Spacapan, M., Mandic‐Mulec, I., & Stanley‐Wall, N. R. (2018). Social behaviours by Bacillus subtilis: quorum sensing, kin discrimination and beyond. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.14127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.