The Role of Morphological and Contextual Information in L2 Lexical Inference
Abstract
This study investigated the role of morphological and contextual information in inferring the meaning of unknown L2 words during reading. Four groups of college‐level ESL students, beginning (n = 34), intermediate (n = 27), high‐intermediate (n = 21), and advanced (n = 25), chose the inferred meanings of 20 pseudo compounds (e.g., rainfime) from multiple choice options. The pseudo compounds were presented in a set of sentences. In the Morphology Reliable condition, the known word part in the pseudo compounds provided semantic information about the meaning of the compounds, which also matched the context of the sentences. In the Morphology Unreliable condition, the known word part did not provide any reliable semantic information nor did it match the context. The critical answer options were the meanings based on morphological information and the meanings based on contextual information. Results indicated significant differences in the choice of answers between the groups only in the Morphology Unreliable condition: The beginning‐level learners relied more on morphological information even though the meanings based on morphology were incorrect. The study discusses the underlying processes in the choice of information used in lexical inference during reading.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies on adult foreign language learners indicated that learners were most likely to make an accurate guess when they combined morphological and contextual information, but that lower-proficiency learners were likely to rely more on morphology and less on context.
“Studies on adult foreign language learners indicated that learners where most likely to make an accurate guess when they combined morphological and contextual information (Mori, 2003), but that lower-proficiency learners were likely to rely more on morphology and less on context (Hamada, 2014;Mori & Nagy, 1999).”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Hamada, 2014
Cites
Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Rott, S. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004039 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
McCutchen, D., & Logan, B. (2011) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.003 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10122-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This confirms findings on other reading skills (Lervåg & Aukrust, 2010; Raudszus et al., 2019; van den Bosch, Segers, & Verhoeven, 2018), and is in line with findings on adult L2 learners (Hamada, 2014; Mori & Nagy, 1999).”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- Hamada, M.
- Affiliations
- Ball State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hamada, Megumi
- ORCID
- Hamada, Megumi
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-10
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 992-1005
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W1999391927
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- lexical inference, second language reading, morphological data, contextual information, word meaning inference, ESL learners, vocabulary acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review