The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SLA and the Study of Equitable Multilingualism
Abstract
The Douglas Fir Group (2016) sought to articulate a transdisciplinary agenda for SLA but said little about multilingualism specifically. Moreover, many multilinguals are under siege in a worrisome world where threats to human difference have risen to the mainstream in the aftermath of Brexit and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. I argue that considering multilingualism as the central object of inquiry and embracing social justice as an explicit disciplinary goal are two moves necessary to provide sustainable support for the kind of transdisciplinary SLA that the Douglas Fir Group (2016) envisioned. I examine some missing pieces of the puzzle of transdisciplinary transformation that may make it possible for SLA researchers, and particularly those who investigate linguistic–cognitive dimensions of language learning, to contribute knowledge about the human capacity for language while supporting equitable multilingualism for all.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810365313 · Cited by 4,612
WEIRD languages have misled us, too
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1000018x · Cited by 4,076
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014) · doi:10.1057/9781137385765 · Cited by 3,831
The Sociolinguistics of Globalization
Blommaert, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511845307 · Cited by 3,737
Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective
Croft, W. (2001) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 · Cited by 2,910
Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language
Wei, L. (2018) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amx039 · Cited by 2,907
Undoing Appropriateness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Language Diversity in Education.
Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149 · Cited by 2,829
Education at a glance: OECD indicators, 2002
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-4369 · Cited by 2,732
Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2818659 · Cited by 1,915
Cited by
LEUNG, C., & VALDÉS, G. (2019) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12568 · Cited by 205
Marked and Unmarked Translanguaging in Accelerated, Mainstream, and Sheltered English Classrooms
Beiler, I. R. (2021) · Multilingua · doi:10.1515/multi-2020-0022 · Cited by 75
Fluency in Dialogue: Turn‐Taking Behavior Shapes Perceived Fluency in Native and Nonnative Speech
van Os, M., de Jong, N. H., & Bosker, H. R. (2020) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12416 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- ORTEGA, L.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 23-38
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2911211325
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 148.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SLA and the Study of Equitable Multilingualism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/modl.12525
- The paper
- ORTEGA, L. (2019). SLA and the Study of Equitable Multilingualism. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.