Cited by 41Arabic Language Education StudiesReading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Arabic Diacritics and Their Role in Facilitating Reading Speed, Accuracy, and Comprehension by English L2 Learners of Arabic

Open access
MIDHWAH, ALI AL, ALHAWARY, MOHAMMAD T.·2020·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

The present study investigated the role of Arabic diacritics in word recognition and their impact on Arabic L2 learners’ reading speed, accuracy, and comprehension at different stages of Arabic L2 acquisition. Fifty‐four English L2 learners of Arabic from 3 proficiency levels (beginner, intermediate, and advanced) participated in the study. They belonged to 2 sets of groups: half with exposure to instructional materials containing diacritics, vowelized textbook (VT), and the other half with exposure to instructional materials not containing diacritics, un‐vowelized textbook (UVT). Participants performed word‐list reading, text reading, and target‐word comprehension tasks under vowelized (V) and un‐vowelized (UV) conditions. The results revealed participants in all VT groups did consistently better than their UVT counterparts. This positive role of diacritics in terms of Arabic word recognition and reading performance implies that inclusion of diacritics in words and texts within instructional materials does not only benefit Arabic L2 learners by removing ambiguity from words, but it also positively impacts their reading and pronunciation performance in general. The study findings and pedagogical implications are also relevant to other languages, such as Farsi and Hebrew, which exhibit similar orthographic features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/modl.12642

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Alhawary, M. T. (2017). Empirical directions in the fu- ture of Arabic second language acquisition re- search and second language pedagogy. In K. M. Wahba, Z. A. Taha, & L. England (Eds.), Hand- book for Arabic language teaching professionals in the 21st century II (pp. 408-421). New York, London: Routledge.
  2. Brustad, K., Al-Batal, M., & Al-Tonsi, A. (2004). Al-kitaab fii ta'allum al-'Arabiyya: A textbook for beginning Ara- bic, part one (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: George- town University Press.
  3. Brustad, K., Al-Batal, M., & Al-Tonsi, A. (2007). Al-kitaab fii ta'allum al-'Arabiyya, part two (2nd ed.). Washing- ton, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  4. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2001). Pseudo homophone effects and phono- logical recoding procedures in reading develop- ment in English and German. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 648-664.
  5. Williams, J. N. (2004). Implicit learning of form- meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. N. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), From meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 203-218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Authors
MIDHWAH, A. A., & ALHAWARY, M. T.
Affiliations
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
ALHAWARY, MOHAMMAD T.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
418-438
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W3036768154
Cited by
41
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 28
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Arabic Language Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
Arabic diacritics, vowelization, Arabic as a second language, reading speed, reading accuracy, reading comprehension, word recognition, orthographic features, teaching materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review