Cited by 76Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

VI. NIH toolbox cognition battery (CB): measuring processing speed

Open access
Carlozzi, Noelle E, Tulsky, David S, Kail, Robert V, Beaumont, Jennifer L·2013·Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test, which was developed to assess processing speed within the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB). We describe the development of the test, highlighting its utility in children. In addition, we examine descriptive data, test–retest reliability, validity, and preliminary work creating a composite index of processing speed. Results indicated that most children were able to understand the basic concepts of the Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test. Further, test–retest reliability was excellent. Analyses examining convergent and discriminant validity provided support for the utility of the test as a measure of processing speed. Finally, analyses comparing and combining scores on the Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test with other measures of simple reaction time from the NIH Toolbox CB indicated that a Processing Speed Composite score performed better than any test examined in isolation. Taken together, the Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test appears to exhibit a number of strengths: it is child-friendly and engaging, short and easy to administer, and has good construct validity, especially when used as part of a composite score.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mono.12036

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degree of cognitive change and level of impairment after TBI vary as a function of the severity of injury.

    “The degree of cognitive change and level of impairment after TBI vary as a function of the severity of injury (Carlozzi, Tulsky, Kail, & Beaumont, 2013; Rohling, Meyers, & Millis, 2003).”

    From Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. (2017) · cites this paper as Carlozzi, Tulsky, Kail, & Beaumont, 2013

    The “Cognitive Processing, and Biological Substrates” section says children with closed head injury have slower processing speed than typically developing peers. It does not say that cognitive change or impairment varies with injury severity, and its finding concerns processing speed in children rather than cognitive impairment after TBI generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The NIHTB-CB has demonstrated test-retest reliability (ICC 0.76 to 0.97) and convergent and discriminant validity.

    “The developers evaluated and described the psychometric soundness of each test, including test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.76 to 0.97) as well as convergent and discriminant validity (Bauer et al., 2013; Carlozzi et al., 2013; Gershon et al., 2013; Tulsky et al., 2013; Zelazo et al., 2013).”

    From Cognitive weaknesses or impairments on the NIH toolbox cognition battery in children and adolescents: base rates in a normative sample and proposed methods for classification (2025) · cites this paper as Carlozzi et al., 2013

    The Results (Test–Retest Reliability) report an ICC of .84 for the Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test in children aged 3–15, within the cited range, but this paper does not report the range’s endpoints. The Results (Convergent and Discriminant Validity) find adequate convergent validity, while noting that discriminant correlations did not differ significantly from convergent correlations. Thus, this source does not fully establish the stated discriminant validity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Anderson PJ Wood SJ Francis DE Coleman L Anderson V Boneh A 2007 Are neuropsychological impairments in children with early-treated phenylketonuria (PKU) related to white matter abnormalities or elevated phenylalanine levels? Developmental Neuropsychology 32 2 645 668 17931123
  2. Bauer PJ Dikmen S Heaton R Mungas D Slotkin J Beaumont JL This issue Chapter 3—NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CHB): Measuring episodic memory Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development PMC3950959 23952201
  3. Brookshire B Levin HS Song J Zhang L 2004 Components of executive function in typically developing and head-injured children Developmental Neuropsychology 25 1–2 61 83 14984329
  4. Canfield RL Smith EG Brezsnyak MP Snow KL 1997 Information processing through the first year of life: A longitudinal study using the visual expectation paradigm Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 62 2 1 145 9353949
  5. Dunn LM Dunn DM 2007 Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4 San Antonio, TX Pearson
  6. Kail RV 1986 Sources of age differences in speed of processing Child Development 57 4 969 987 3757612
  7. Kail RV 1988 Developmental functions for speeds of cognitive processes Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 45 3 339 364 3385355
  8. Kail RV 2004 Cognitive development includes global and domain-specific processes Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 50 4 445 455
  9. Kail RV Miller CA 2006 Developmental change in processing speed: Domain specificity and stability during childhood and adolescence Journal of Cognition and Development 7 119 137
  10. Kiselev S Espy KA Sheffield T 2009 Age-related differences in reaction time task performance in young children Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102 150 166 18359494
  11. Luna B Garver KE Urban TA Lazar NA Sweeney JA 2004 Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood Child Development 75 5 1357 1372 15369519
  12. Mabbott DJ Noseworthy M Bouffet E Laughlin S Rockel C 2006 White matter growth as a mechanism of cognitive development in children NeuroImage 33 3 936 946 16978884
  13. McAuley T White DA 2011 A latent variables examination of processing speed, response inhibition, and working memory during typical development Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 108 3 453 468 20888572 PMC3032812
  14. Rose SA Feldman JF Jankowski JJ Van Rossem R 2008 A cognitive cascade in infancy: Pathways from prematurity to later mental development Intelligence 36 4 367 378 19122757 PMC2504323
  15. Roth C 1983 Factors affecting developmental changes in the speed of processing Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 35 509 528 6864159
  16. Salthouse TA Babcock RL Shaw RJ 1991 Effects of adult age on structural and operational capacities in working memory Psychology and Aging 6 1 118 127 2029360
  17. Schatz J Kramer JH Ablin A Matthay KK 2000 Processing speed, working memory, and IQ: A developmental model of cognitive deficits following cranial radiation therapy Neuropsychology 14 2 189 200 10791859
  18. Schatz J Kramer JH Ablin AR Matthay KK 2004 Visual attention in long-term survivors of leukemia receiving cranial radiation therapy Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 10 2 211 220 15012841
  19. Silveri MM Tzilos GK Yurgelun-Todd DA 2008 Relationship between white matter volume and cognitive performance during adolescence: Effects of age, sex and risk for drug use Addiction 103 9 1509 1520 18636995 PMC4454456
  20. Soria-Pastor S Gimenez M Narberhaus A Falcon C Botet F Bargallo N 2008 Patterns of cerebral white matter damage and cognitive impairment in adolescents born very preterm International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 26 7 647 654 18765280
  21. Weintraub S Zelazo PD Bauer PJ Wallner-Allen K Dikmen S Heaton RK This issue Chapter 1—NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Introduction and pediatric data Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development PMC3954750 23952199
  22. Zelazo PD Anderson JE Richler J Wallner-Allen K Beaumont JL Weintraub S This issue Chapter 2—NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Measuring executive function and attention Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 23952200

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlozzi, N. E., Tulsky, D. S., Kail, R. V., & Beaumont, J. L.
Corresponding author
Carlozzi, Noelle E
Venue
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
Published
2013-08
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
88-102
ISSN
  • 0037-976X (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5834
OpenAlex
W1896450477
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ag60007-17-0-2)
  • National Institute on Aging (N01 AG060007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, processing speed, children, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, composite score, reaction time, cognitive assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Judgment, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Time Factors, United States, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review