The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved prediction of fungal effector proteins from secretomes with EffectorP 2.0
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Plant‐pathogenic fungi secrete effector proteins to facilitate infection. We describe extensive improvements to EffectorP, the first machine learning classifier for fungal effector prediction. EffectorP 2.0 is now trained on a larger set of effectors and utilizes a different approach based on an ensemble of classifiers trained on different subsets of negative data, offering different views on classification. EffectorP 2.0 achieves an accuracy of 89%, compared with 82% for EffectorP 1.0 and 59.8% for a small size classifier. Important features for effector prediction appear to be protein size, protein net charge as well as the amino acids serine and cysteine. EffectorP 2.0 decreases the number of predicted effectors in secretomes of fungal plant symbionts and saprophytes by 40% when compared with EffectorP 1.0. However, EffectorP 1.0 retains value, and combining EffectorP 1.0 and 2.0 results in a stringent classifier with a low false positive rate of 9%. EffectorP 2.0 predicts significant enrichments of effectors in 12 of 13 sets of infection‐induced proteins from diverse fungal pathogens, whereas a small cysteine‐rich classifier detects enrichment in only seven of 13. EffectorP 2.0 will fast track the prioritization of high‐confidence effector candidates for functional validation and aid in improving our understanding of effector biology. EffectorP 2.0 is available at http://effectorp.csiro.au .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein
Kyte, J., & Doolittle, R. F. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · Cited by 22,843
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · Cited by 12,654
EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite.
Rice, P., Longden, I., & Bleasby, A. (2000) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2 · Cited by 9,466
SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions
Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G., & Nielsen, H. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1701 · Cited by 8,847
Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server
Gasteiger, E., Hoogland, C., Gattiker, A., Duvaud, S., Wilkins, M. R., Appel, R. D., & Bairoch, A. (2005) · The Proteomics Protocols Handbook · doi:10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571 · Cited by 8,681
Improved Prediction of Signal Peptides: SignalP 3.0
Dyrløv Bendtsen, J., Nielsen, H., von Heijne, G., & Brunak, S. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028 · Cited by 6,350
HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching
Finn, R. D., Clements, J., & Eddy, S. R. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr367 · Cited by 5,952
High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite
Gotz, S., Garcia-Gomez, J. M., Terol, J., Williams, T. D., Nagaraj, S. H., Nueda, M. J., Robles, M., Talon, M., Dopazo, J., & Conesa, A. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn176 · Cited by 4,423
Predicting Subcellular Localization of Proteins Based on their N-terminal Amino Acid Sequence
Emanuelsson, O., Nielsen, H., Brunak, S., & von Heijne, G. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.3903 · Cited by 4,263
Metadata
- Authors
- Sperschneider, J., Dodds, P. N., Gardiner, D. M., Singh, K. B., & Taylor, J. M.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2094-2110
- ISSN
- 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-6722
- OpenAlex
- W2787339353
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 17.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved prediction of fungal effector proteins from secretomes with EffectorP 2.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mpp.12682
- The paper
- Sperschneider, J., Dodds, P. N., Gardiner, D. M., Singh, K. B., & Taylor, J. M. (2018). Improved prediction of fungal effector proteins from secretomes with EffectorP 2.0. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12682
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.