Prevalence, risk factors, treatment and outcome of multidrug resistance Candida auris infections in Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) patients: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen in intensive care settings (ICU). During the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, ICU admissions were overwhelmed, possibly contributing to the C. auris outbreak in COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVES: The present systematic review addresses the prevalence, underlying diseases, iatrogenic risk factors, treatment and outcome of C. auris infections in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and LitCovid databases were systematically searched with appropriate keywords from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021. RESULTS: A total of 97 cases of C. auris were identified in COVID-19 patients. The pooled prevalence of C. auris infections (encompassing candidemia and non-candidemia cases) in COVID-19 patients was 14%. The major underlying diseases were diabetes mellitus (42.7%), hypertension (32.9%) and obesity (14.6%), followed by the iatrogenic risk factors such as a central venous catheter (76.8%%), intensive care unit (ICU) stay (75.6%) and broad-spectrum antibiotic usage (74.3%). There were no significant differences in underlying disease and iatrogenic risk factors among C. auris non-candidemia/colonisation and C. auris candidemia cases. The mortality rate of the total cohort is 44.4%, whereas, in C. auris candidemia patients, the mortality was 64.7%. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the prevalence of C. auris infections remains unchanged in the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospital-acquired risk factors may contribute to the clinical illness. Proper infection control practices and hospital surveillance may stop future hospital outbreaks during the pandemic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Obesity is associated with C. auris infection in certain clinical studies.
“which may help explain the association between obesity and C. auris infection in certain clinical studies [44].”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092 · see citing works
Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool
Munn, Z., Barker, T. H., Moola, S., Tufanaru, C., Stern, C., McArthur, A., Stephenson, M., & Aromataris, E. (2019) · JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00099 · Cited by 1,581 · see citing works
Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: <i>R</i> as a Computational Back-End
Wallace, B. C., Dahabreh, I. J., Trikalinos, T. A., Lau, J., Trow, P., & Schmid, C. H. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v049.i05 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
<i>Candida auris</i> Outbreak in a COVID-19 Specialty Care Unit — Florida, July–August 2020
Prestel, C., Anderson, E., Forsberg, K., Lyman, M., de Perio, M. A., Kuhar, D., Edwards, K., Rivera, M., Shugart, A., Walters, M., et al. (2021) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7002e3 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Chen, J., Tian, S., Han, X., Chu, Y., Wang, Q., Zhou, B., & Shang, H. (2020) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-020-05543-0 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Maphanga, T. G., Naicker, S. D., Kwenda, S., Muñoz, J. F., van Schalkwyk, E., Wadula, J., Nana, T., Ismail, A., Coetzee, J., Govind, C., et al. (2021) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00517-21 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Santana, D. J., Anku, J. A. E., Zhao, G., Zarnowski, R., Johnson, C. J., Hautau, H., Visser, N. D., Ibrahim, A. S., Andes, D., Nett, J. E., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf8972 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin
Thangamani, S., Balakumar, A., Datta, A., Bryak, G., & Lionakis, M. S. (2026) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1014075 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vinayagamoorthy, K., Pentapati, K. C., & Prakash, H.
- Affiliations
- Panjab University (IN)
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- International Higher School of Medicine (KG)
- Corresponding author
- Prakash, Hariprasath
- Venue
- Mycoses
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-05-30
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 613-624
- ISSN
- 0027-5557 (ISSN-L)
- 0933-7407
- 1439-0507
- PMC
- PMC9115268
- OpenAlex
- W4224224284
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Mycoses (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Keywords
- Candida auris, COVID-19 pandemic, candidemia, multidrug resistance, prevalence, risk factors, central venous catheters, intensive care unit, broad-spectrum antibiotics, mortality, diabetes mellitus, nosocomial infections, infection control, hospital surveillance
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Candida auris, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Humans, Iatrogenic Disease, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Candidemia, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review