A Candida auris –specific adhesin, Scf1 , governs surface association, colonization, and virulence
Open accessAbstract
Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen responsible for health care–associated outbreaks that arise from persistent surface and skin colonization. We characterized the arsenal of adhesins used by C. auris and discovered an uncharacterized adhesin, Surface Colonization Factor (Scf1), and a conserved adhesin, Iff4109, that are essential for the colonization of inert surfaces and mammalian hosts. SCF1 is apparently specific to C. auris , and its expression mediates adhesion to inert and biological surfaces across isolates from all five clades. Unlike canonical fungal adhesins, which function through hydrophobic interactions, Scf1 relies on exposed cationic residues for surface association. SCF1 is required for C. auris biofilm formation, skin colonization, virulence in systemic infection, and colonization of inserted medical devices.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper identifies Scf1 (SCF1; B9J08_001458), a *Candida auris*–specific adhesin, and the conserved adhesin IFF4109 as key mediators of surface attachment, colonization, biofilm formation, and virulence. Scf1 promotes adhesion via exposed cationic residues rather than canonical hydrophobic interactions, and its expression varies across *C. auris* isolates in a manner correlated with adhesive capacity.
Key findings
- Of twelve *C. auris* ALS/IFF-HYR adhesin deletion mutants tested, only deletion of IFF4109 (B9J08_004109) caused an adhesive defect; a screen of 2,560 insertional mutants found the greatest adhesion loss in tnSWI1 (B9J08_003460) and tnBCY1 (B9J08_002818), with SCF1 (B9J08_001458) as the strongest dysregulated gene in tnSWI1.
- SCF1 is apparently specific to *C. auris* and *C. haemulonii*. Across 23 *C. auris* isolates from all five clades, adhesion varied significantly (p=2×10⁻¹⁶, F=35.06, one-way ANOVA), whereas 19 diverse *C. albicans* isolates showed no significant adhesive variation (p=0.054, F=1.856). SCF1 transcript abundance correlated with adhesion (r=0.87, p=8.4×10⁻⁸), while IFF4109 did not (r=0.3, p=0.25).
- Scf1-mediated adhesion does not depend on cell surface hydrophobicity: IFF4109 deletion reduced hydrophobicity, but SCF1 deletion or overexpression did not. Only SCF1 mediated adhesion to a hydrophilic, vacuum plasma–treated polystyrene surface. High arginine concentrations ablated AR0382 adhesion, and the HHRR cationic-aromatic cluster at residues 52–55 was required for adhesion; a wild-type Scf1 peptide (residues 50–62) bound polystyrene microspheres, while mutation of HHRR ablated binding.
- SCF1 and IFF4109 were functionally redundant for biofilm formation, but loss of both ablated AR0382 biofilm and rat central venous catheter colonization; SCF1 overexpression potentiated AR0387 colonization. Loss of both adhesins reduced human skin explant and murine skin colonization and reduced dissemination to kidneys and heart. In disseminated infection, wild-type AR0382 caused 100% mortality within 12 days versus 20% mortality after 21 days for the mutant; SCF1 overexpression reduced median survival of AR0387-infected mice from 18.5 days to 11.5 days.
Methods
- Genetic and phenotypic assays in *C. auris* clade I AR0382: individual deletion mutants for twelve ALS/IFF-HYR adhesin genes, a 2,560-member insertional mutant library screen, flow cytometric adhesion assays to polystyrene microspheres, RNA-seq, complementation, epitope tagging, overexpression, AlphaFold2 modeling, peptide binding assays, MATH hydrophobicity assays, and biofilm assays.
- Isolate panel and expression analysis: adhesion measured for 23 *C. auris* isolates representing all five clades and 19 genetically diverse *C. albicans* clinical isolates; SCF1 and IFF4109 transcript abundance compared with adhesion.
- In vivo and ex vivo colonization/infection models: polyethylene rat central venous catheters, ex vivo human skin explants, in vivo murine skin, and immunosuppressed mice infected intravenously with 5×10⁷ *C. auris* cells; histopathology at 7 days and survival monitored for 21 days. Statistical tests included one-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests, Student’s t-test, Pearson correlation, and Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: the mechanisms by which SCF1 and IFF4109 interact with host systems remain unclear; the selective pressure governing differential SCF1 expression is unknown; and whether the lack of surface-association phenotypes for other conserved adhesin genes reflects functional or regulatory divergence remains to be explored.
- Evident from the text: many mechanistic and virulence experiments focus on the clade I AR0382 background and selected comparator isolates, so generalizability across all *C. auris* lineages is not fully established. The paper also relies on in vitro adhesion/biofilm assays and animal or ex vivo models, which may not fully recapitulate human colonization and infection. No dedicated limitations section is present in the provided text.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 45 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
The nonspecific surface association driven by SCF1 does not occur through canonical hydrophobic interactions, but rather through cation-substrate interactions.
“The nonspecific surface association driven by SCF1 does not occur through canonical hydrophobic interactions, but rather through cation-substrate interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
SCF1 is critical for robust colonization of in vivo central venous catheters.
“SCF1 is critical for biofilm formation in vitro, robust colonization of in vivo central venous catheters, colonization of both human and murine skin, and virulence in disseminated infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingown data
Complementation with an epitope-tagged SCF1 allele in the endogenous locus rescued the adhesive defect.
“Complementation with an epitope-tagged SCF1 allele in the endogenous locus rescued the adhesive defect, and the epitope-tagged Scf1 protein localized to the cell surface, consistent with its role as an adhesin (Fig. 1F, Fig. 1G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
19 genetically diverse C. albicans clinical isolates showed no significant adhesive variation (p=0.054, F=1.856, one-way ANOVA).
“In contrast, a similar analysis of 19 genetically diverse C. albicans clinical isolates showed no significant adhesive variation (p=0.054,F=1.856, one-way ANOVA), indicating the surface association strategies of C. auris are more plastic than C. albicans (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The phenotypic plasticity in substrate association among C. auris isolates is tightly correlated with strain-specific transcriptional control of SCF1.
“C. auris isolates from diverse and similar genetic lineages exhibit striking divergence in terms of substrate association, and this phenotypic plasticity is tightly correlated with strain-specific transcriptional control of SCF1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
C. auris does not primarily rely on conserved adhesins for surface attachment.
“We found that C. auris does not primarily rely on conserved adhesins for surface attachment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Adhesion to polymer substrates is a valid model for surface association and colonization.
- Findingown data
Deletion of the B9J08_001458 ORF in AR0382 conferred a substantial adhesive defect.
“Deletion of the B9J08_001458 ORF in AR0382 conferred a substantial adhesive defect, thus we refer to the gene as Surface Colonization Factor (SCF1) (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SCF1 is critical for colonization of both human and murine skin.
“SCF1 is critical for biofilm formation in vitro, robust colonization of in vivo central venous catheters, colonization of both human and murine skin, and virulence in disseminated infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingown data
The epitope-tagged Scf1 protein localized to the cell surface.
“Complementation with an epitope-tagged SCF1 allele in the endogenous locus rescued the adhesive defect, and the epitope-tagged Scf1 protein localized to the cell surface, consistent with its role as an adhesin (Fig. 1F, Fig. 1G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared to the AR0382 parent, the tnSWI1 mutant exhibited no significant transcriptional dysregulation of the ALS or IFF/HYR adhesins.
“Compared to the AR0382 parent, the tnSWI1 mutant exhibited no significant transcriptional dysregulation of the ALS or IFF/HYR adhesins, suggesting alternative mediators of adhesion (Fig. 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SCF1 is critical for virulence in disseminated infection.
“SCF1 is critical for biofilm formation in vitro, robust colonization of in vivo central venous catheters, colonization of both human and murine skin, and virulence in disseminated infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingown data
The greatest loss of adhesive capacity was observed in tnSWI1 and tnBCY1 mutants.
“The greatest loss of adhesive capacity was observed in tnSWI1 (B9J08_003460) and tnBCY1 (B9J08_002818) mutants (Fig. 1B, Fig. 1C, Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
C. auris isolates from diverse and similar genetic lineages exhibit striking divergence in terms of substrate association.
“C. auris isolates from diverse and similar genetic lineages exhibit striking divergence in terms of substrate association, and this phenotypic plasticity is tightly correlated with strain-specific transcriptional control of SCF1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
23 C. auris isolates representing all five clades and diverse geographic origins exhibited substantial adhesive variation, regardless of clade (p=2x10-16, F=35.06, one-way ANOVA).
“These strains exhibited substantial adhesive variation, regardless of clade (p=2x10 -16 , F=35.06, one-way ANOVA) (Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Homologs of SCF1 were identified only in C. auris and the closely related Candida haemulonii species and not in other members of the haemulonii complex.
“we identified homologs of SCF1 only in C. auris and the closely related Candida haemulonii species and not in other members of the haemulonii complex (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The B9J08_001458 gene exhibited a putative three-domain architecture consistent with canonical GPI-anchored fungal adhesins.
“This gene, however, exhibited a putative three-domain architecture consistent with canonical GPIanchored fungal adhesins (Fig. 1E) (23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
SCF1 is an adhesin specific to C. auris.
“we identified Surface Colonization Factor (SCF1), an adhesin specific to C. auris.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
“SCF1 is apparently specific to C. auris and its expression mediates adhesion to inert and biological surfaces across isolates from all five clades.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
- Findingown data
SCF1 is critical for biofilm formation in vitro.
“SCF1 is critical for biofilm formation in vitro, robust colonization of in vivo central venous catheters, colonization of both human and murine skin, and virulence in disseminated infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Adhesion to polymer substrates is a valid model for surface association and colonization.
- Findingown data
The highly adhesive AR0382 strain exhibited elevated cell surface hydrophobicity compared to the poorly adhesive AR0387.
“The highly adhesive AR0382 strain exhibited elevated cell surface hydrophobicity compared to the poorly adhesive AR0387 (Fig. 3A, Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No nucleotide variants were observed in the SCF1 ORF or neighboring intragenic regions between AR0382 and AR0387.
“Furthermore, we observed no nucleotide variants in the SCF1 ORF or neighboring intragenic regions between AR0382 and AR0387.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Transcript abundance of SCF1 was tightly positively correlated with adhesion across isolates, regardless of clade (r=0.87, p=8.4x10-8).
“Transcript abundance of SCF1 was tightly positively correlated with adhesion across isolates, regardless of clade (r=0.87,p=8.4 x 10 -8 ) (Fig. 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overexpression of SCF1 in AR0387 was sufficient to increase fungal lesions.
“Histopathological examination of tissues collected from mice 7 days after intravenous C. auris infection revealed that loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 reduced AR0382 dissemination to the kidneys and heart, while overexpression of SCF1 in AR0387 was sufficient to increase fungal lesions (Fig. 5E, Fig. 5F, Fig. S15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingown data
The reliance on SCF1 for surface association is complicated by the genetic interaction with IFF4109, where deletion of both does not result in a more severe adhesive defect than deletion of SCF1 alone.
“The reliance on SCF1 for surface association is complicated by the genetic interaction with IFF4109, where deletion of both does not result in a more severe adhesive defect than deletion of SCF1 alone (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Substantial variation in adhesion was observed even between genetically similar isolates of C. auris, e.g., AR0382 and AR0387, which differ by only 206 coding SNPs.
“Interestingly, substantial variation in adhesion was observed even between genetically similar isolates of C. auris, e.g., AR0382 and AR0387, which differ by only 206 coding SNPs (Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Model confidence dwindles outside the Fibronectin fold, suggesting substantial variation from Flo11 adhesins.
“Furthermore, model confidence dwindles outside the Fibronectin fold, suggesting substantial variation from Flo11 adhesins (Fig. S9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: AlphaFold2 structural predictions reflect the actual structure and adhesive behavior of Scf1.
- Findingown data
A nearby cation-aromatic cluster, K44-K49, which was modeled to be less surface-exposed, was not required for adhesion.
“Notably, a nearby cation-aromatic cluster, K44-K49, which was modeled to be less surface-exposed, was not required for adhesion (Fig. 4C, Fig. 4D, Fig. S11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Overexpression of the clade I SCF1 allele from AR0382 further elevated adhesion, despite similar levels of overexpression.
“However, overexpression of the clade I SCF1 allele from AR0382 further elevated adhesion, despite similar levels of overexpression (Fig. S6A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
High concentrations of arginine in solution were sufficient to ablate AR0382 adhesion.
“Consistent with this hypothesis, high concentrations of arginine in solution were sufficient to ablate AR0382 adhesion (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overexpression of SCF1 potentiated skin colonization by AR0387.
“Again, we observed that loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 diminished the ability of AR0382 to colonize ex vivo human skin explants and in vivo murine skin, while overexpression of SCF1 potentiated skin colonization by AR0387 (Fig. 5C, Fig. 5D, Fig. S14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingnone given
The other conserved adhesin genes appeared to not mediate surface association.
“Interestingly, the other conserved adhesin genes appeared to not mediate surface association.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Transcriptional overexpression of SCF1 was sufficient to elevate adhesion in the otherwise poorly adhesive isolate AR0387.
“Experimentally, transcriptional overexpression of SCF1 was sufficient to elevate adhesion in the otherwise poorly adhesive isolate AR0387 (Fig. 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Deletion or overexpression of SCF1 did not significantly impact cell surface hydrophobicity in either AR0382 or AR0387.
“In contrast, deletion or overexpression of SCF1 did not significantly impact cell surface hydrophobicity in either AR0382 or AR0387 (Fig. 3A, Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 ablated the ability of AR0382 to colonize the luminal surface of a polyethylene rat central venous catheter.
“This pattern continued for in vivo biofilms, where loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 ablated the ability of AR0382 to colonize the luminal surface of a polyethylene rat central venous catheter, and overexpression of SCF1 was sufficient to potentiate AR0387 colonization (Fig. 5A, Fig. 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingown data
No association was observed between transcriptional control of IFF4109 and adhesion (r=0.3, p=0.25).
“In contrast, we observed no association between transcriptional control of IFF4109 and adhesion (r=0.3,p=0.25) (Fig. 2D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the poorly adhesive AR0387, SCF1 was the most down-regulated gene compared to the highly adhesive AR0382.
“In the poorly adhesive AR0387, SCF1 was the most down-regulated gene compared to the highly adhesive AR0382, reminiscent of the poorly adhesive tnSWI1 mutant (Fig. S5A, Fig. 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AlphaFold2 suggested the apical N-terminal domain of Scf1 contains a core Fibronectin-type III fold similar to the FLO11 family of adhesins characterized in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and conserved throughout Ascomycota.
“To investigate the mechanism of Scf1 adhesion, we examined the apical N-terminal domain using AlphaFold2, which suggested this domain contains a core Fibronectin-type III fold similar to the FLO11 family of adhesins characterized in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and conserved throughout Ascomycota (Fig. S8A) (32,35).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: AlphaFold2 structural predictions reflect the actual structure and adhesive behavior of Scf1.
- Findingown data
Mutating the entire cation-aromatic cluster, H52 H53 R54 R55, resulted in a similar adhesive defect.
“Mutating the entire cation-aromatic cluster, H52 H53 R54 R55, resulted in a similar adhesive defect (Fig. 4C, Fig. 4D, Fig. S11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 diminished the ability of AR0382 to colonize ex vivo human skin explants and in vivo murine skin.
“Again, we observed that loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 diminished the ability of AR0382 to colonize ex vivo human skin explants and in vivo murine skin, while overexpression of SCF1 potentiated skin colonization by AR0387 (Fig. 5C, Fig. 5D, Fig. S14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingown data
Overexpression of SCF1 was sufficient to potentiate AR0387 colonization of the catheter.
“This pattern continued for in vivo biofilms, where loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 ablated the ability of AR0382 to colonize the luminal surface of a polyethylene rat central venous catheter, and overexpression of SCF1 was sufficient to potentiate AR0387 colonization (Fig. 5A, Fig. 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingown data
The transcriptome of AR0387 showed little overlap with that of the tnSWI1 strain, indicating dysregulation of SCF1 in AR0387 is not caused by a SWI/SNF complex defect.
“The transcriptome of AR0387 showed little overlap with that of the tnSWI1 strain, however, indicating dysregulation of SCF1 in AR0387 is not caused by a SWI/SNF complex defect (Fig. S5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 reduced AR0382 dissemination to the kidneys and heart.
“Histopathological examination of tissues collected from mice 7 days after intravenous C. auris infection revealed that loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 reduced AR0382 dissemination to the kidneys and heart, while overexpression of SCF1 in AR0387 was sufficient to increase fungal lesions (Fig. 5E, Fig. 5F, Fig. S15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
- Findingown data
Expression of SCF1 alone in otherwise biofilm-incompetent isolates was sufficient to establish biofilm colonization.
“Expression of SCF1 alone in otherwise biofilm-incompetent isolates was sufficient to establish biofilm colonization (Fig. S13B, Fig. S13C, Fig. S13D, Fig. S13E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overexpression of the native SCF1 allele in AR0381, a poorly adhesive clade II isolate, was sufficient to increase attachment.
“Overexpression of the native SCF1 allele in AR0381, a poorly adhesive clade II isolate, was sufficient to increase attachment (Fig. S6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In its primary sequence, the SCF1 N-terminal domain exhibits an enrichment of arginine and lysine residues compared to other yeast adhesins.
“In its primary sequence, the SCF1 N-terminal domain exhibits an enrichment of arginine and lysine residues compared to other yeast adhesins (Table S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the clade I AR0382 background, complementation of the Δscf1 mutant with either the clade I or the clade II SCF1 allele resulted in similar levels of rescue of the adhesive phenotype.
“Interestingly, in the clade I AR0382 background, which relies strongly on SCF1 for adhesion, complementation of the Δscf1 mutant with either the clade I or the clade II SCF1 allele resulted in similar levels of rescue of the adhesive phenotype (Fig. S6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Specific cationic residues are critical for Scf1-mediated surface association.
“Specific cationic residues are critical for Scf1-mediated surface association”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ability of C. auris to robustly colonize a range of living and abiotic substrates is central to its emergence as a global health threat.
“The ability of C. auris to robustly colonize a range of living and abiotic substrates is central to its emergence as a global health threat.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The phenotypic importance of C. auris ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin genes is not well understood.
“Moreover, their phenotypic importance in C. auris is not well understood (24)(25)(26).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (24)(25)(26)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
In C. auris, adhesins exhibit structural and transcriptional variation, which may explain their functional specificity.
“In C. auris, adhesins exhibit structural and transcriptional variation, which may explain their functional specificity (Fig. S3B) (25,26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The surface association strategies of C. auris are more plastic than C. albicans.
“In contrast, a similar analysis of 19 genetically diverse C. albicans clinical isolates showed no significant adhesive variation (p=0.054,F=1.856, one-way ANOVA), indicating the surface association strategies of C. auris are more plastic than C. albicans (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
C. auris encodes twelve genes homologous to members of the characterized ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin families.
“C. auris encodes twelve genes homologous to members of the characterized ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin families (24,25,27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
These findings suggest functional specificity for surface association for SCF1 and IFF4109.
“These findings suggest functional specificity for surface association for SCF1 and IFF4109.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The complementary function of SCF1 and IFF4109 with divergent mechanisms suggests C. auris has evolved the capacity for promiscuous surface association and colonization.
“Furthermore, the complementary function of SCF1 and IFF4109 with divergent mechanisms suggests C. auris has evolved the capacity for promiscuous surface association and colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Adhesive variation between C. auris isolates is associated with SCF1 expression variation.
“These data show that adhesive variation between C. auris isolates is associated with SCF1 expression variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cation rich SCF1 appears to functionally resemble proteins from bivalve, barnacle, and Vibrio adhesion systems.
“The cation rich SCF1, however, appears to functionally resemble proteins from bivalve, barnacle, and Vibrio adhesion systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our work characterizes the adhesin machinery used by C. auris for surface association and colonization.
“Overall, our work characterizes of the adhesin machinery used by C. auris for surface association and colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Development of unique adhesion biology may in part explain the tenacity of this organism on medically-relevant substrates.
“Development of unique adhesion biology may in part explain the tenacity of this organism on medically-relevant substrates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 34
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDeletion of IFF4109 in the Δscf1 background did not significantly reduce attachment beyond deletion of SCF1 alone, suggesting non-additive roles for these adhesins.
“Notably, deletion of IFF4109 in the Δscf1 background did not significantly reduce attachment beyond deletion of SCF1 alone, suggesting non-additive roles for these adhesins (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe B9J08_001458 gene was also strongly downregulated in the tnBCY1 mutant while IFF4109 was not.
“Notably, this same gene was also strongly downregulated in the tnBCY1 mutant while IFF4109 was not (Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSCF1 is encoded in a genomic locus in C. auris and C. haemulonii that is syntenic, lacking an SCF1 homolog, even to distantly related species.
“SCF1 is encoded in a genomic locus in C. auris and C. haemulonii that is syntenic, lacking an SCF1 homolog, even to distantly related species (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe strongest, most significantly dysregulated gene in tnSWI1 was an uncharacterized ORF (B9J08_001458), which had no significant primary sequence homology to characterized genes.
“The strongest, most significantly dysregulated gene in tnSWI1 was an uncharacterized ORF (B9J08_001458), which had no significant primary sequence homology to characterized genes (Fig. 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSCF1 is necessary and sufficient for robust attachment of C. auris cells to polymer substrates.
“SCF1 is necessary and sufficient for robust attachment of C. auris cells to polymer substrates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Adhesion to polymer substrates is a valid model for surface association and colonization.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough the C. haemulonii SCF1 homolog functionally complements Δscf1 in C. auris, it is not essential for adhesion in C. haemulonii and shows poor expression across isolates, indicating reliance on SCF1 for adhesion is specific to C. auris.
“Although the C. haemulonii SCF1 homolog functionally complements Δscf1 in C. auris, it is not essential for adhesion in C. haemulonii and shows poor expression across isolates, indicating reliance on SCF1 for adhesion is specific to C. auris (Fig. S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the twelve adhesin mutants, only deletion of IFF4109 conferred an adhesive defect, while still failing to completely ablate attachment.
“Of the twelve adhesin mutants, only deletion of IFF4109 (B9J08_004109) conferred an adhesive defect, while still failing to completely ablate attachment (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIFF4892 encodes the entire canonical adhesin architecture and shows similar expression to IFF4109, but of the two, only IFF4109 is required for adhesion, suggesting individual adhesins mediate specific adhesive mechanisms.
“However, IFF4892 encodes the entire canonical adhesin architecture and shows similar expression to IFF4109, but of the two, only IFF4109 is required for adhesion, suggesting individual adhesins mediate specific adhesive mechanisms (Fig. 1A, Fig. S3B) (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIncreased flocculation and aggregation are associated with overexpression of ALS4112, while these phenotypes are not associated with SCF1, despite its transcriptional expression being among the highest 2.5% of all genes in this strain background.
“Such functional specificity is shown by increased flocculation and aggregation associated with overexpression of ALS4112, while these phenotypes are not associated with SCF1, despite its transcriptional expression being among the highest 2.5% of all genes in this strain background (Fig. S3B, Fig. S3C, Fig. S3D) (30,31).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth IFF4109 and SCF1 mediated adhesion to the hydrophobic substrate.
“Both IFF4109 and SCF1 mediated adhesion to the hydrophobic substrate (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeveral mutations had no adhesive impact, but an R54A R55A mutant exhibited a modest adhesive defect, while showing no discernable effect on SCF1 transcription, protein expression, or localization.
“Several mutations had no adhesive impact, but an R54A R55A mutant exhibited a modest adhesive defect, while showing no discernable effect on SCF1 transcription, protein expression, or localization (Fig. S10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverexpression of SCF1 reduced the median survival of mice infected with AR0387 from 18.5 days to 11.5 days and ablated the difference in overall survival between the less virulent AR0387 and the more virulent AR0382.
“Similarly, overexpression of SCF1 reduced the median survival of mice infected with AR0387 from 18.5 days to 11.5 days and ablated the difference in overall survival between the less virulent AR0387 and the more virulent AR0382 (Fig. 5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn AR0382 and AR0387, the SCF1 locus is invariant, but other isolates exhibit allelic variation primarily concentrated in the low complexity tandem repeats.
“In AR0382 and AR0387, the SCF1 locus is invariant, but other isolates exhibit allelic variation in, primarily concentrated in the low complexity tandem repeats (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two adhesins were functionally redundant, and deletion of both was required to ablate biofilm formation in AR0382, suggesting the partial adhesive contributions of each is sufficient to establish colonization.
“The two adhesins were functionally redundant, and deletion of both was required to ablate biofilm formation in AR0382, suggesting the partial adhesive contributions of each is sufficient to establish colonization (Fig. S13A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationSCF1 does not exhibit significant primary sequence homology to S. cerevisiae FLO11 and lacks conservation of the canonical aromatic bands responsible for adhesive functions in true FLO11 homologs.
“However, SCF1 does not exhibit significant primary sequence homology to S. cerevisiae FLO11 and lacks conservation of the canonical aromatic bands responsible for adhesive functions in true FLO11 homologs (Fig. S8A, Fig. S8B) (32,35).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe wild type Scf1 peptide was similarly able to adhere to phosphotidylcholine microparticles, and SCF1 expression potentiated lipid particle binding by C. auris cells, suggesting SCF1 may also contribute to association with biotic substrates.
“The wild type Scf1 peptide was similarly able to adhere to phosphotidylcholine microparticles, and SCF1 expression potentiated lipid particle binding by C. auris cells, suggesting SCF1 may also contribute to association with biotic substrates (Fig. S12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe magnitude of overexpression using the TEF1 promoter (approximately 2^8-fold increase) was similar to and did not exceed the naturally varying magnitude of expression difference between the two wild type isolates AR0382 and AR0387 (approximately 2^9-fold change).
“Importantly, the magnitude of overexpression using the TEF1 promoter (approximately 2 8 -fold increase) was similar to and did not exceed the naturally varying magnitude of expression difference between the two wild type isolates AR0382 and AR0387 (approximately 2 9 -fold change) (Fig. 2D, Fig. 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLoss of SCF1 and IFF4109 substantially attenuated the virulence of AR0382, with the wild type causing 100% mortality within 12 days of infection and the mutant causing 20% mortality after 21 days.
“Loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 substantially attenuated the virulence of AR0382, with the wild type causing 100% mortality within 12 days of infection and the mutant causing 20% mortality after 21 days (Fig. 5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSimilar concentrations of NaCl or other non-cationic amino acids did not produce the same effect, while exogenous lysine produced a more modest inhibition of attachment, consistent with lysine's weaker ability to form electrostatic interactions.
“Similar concentrations of NaCl or other non-cationic amino acids did not produce the same effect, while exogenous lysine produced a more modest inhibition of attachment, consistent with lysine's weaker ability to form electrostatic interactions (Fig. 4B) (41).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe wild-type Scf1 peptide adhered to polystyrene microspheres, but mutation of the HHRR cluster completely ablated this ability.
“The wild-type peptide adhered to polystyrene microspheres, but mutation of the HHRR cluster completely ablated this ability (Fig. 4E, Fig. 4F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAR0382 and AR0387 still exhibited differential adhesion to the hydrophilic surface, indicating hydrophobic interactions are not primarily responsible for the differential strain phenotypes.
“Notably, AR0382 and AR0387 still exhibited differential adhesion to the hydrophilic surface, indicating hydrophobic interactions are not primarily responsible for the differential strain phenotypes (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDeletion of the IFF4109 adhesin in AR0382 reduced cell surface hydrophobicity, which was rescued to wild type levels by complementation.
“Deletion of the IFF4109 adhesin in AR0382 reduced cell surface hydrophobicity, which was rescued to wild type levels by complementation (Fig. 3A, Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly SCF1 mediated adhesion to the hydrophilic substrate, showing that SCF1 is not dependent on hydrophobicity.
“However, only SCF1 mediated adhesion to the hydrophilic substrate, showing that SCF1 is not dependent on hydrophobicity (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLoss of one adhesin did not result in dysregulation of the other, suggesting the interaction is not a regulatory one.
“Loss of one adhesin did not result in dysregulation of the other, suggesting the interaction is not a regulatory one (Fig. S7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSCF1 mediates host colonization and infection phenotypes.
“SCF1 mediates host colonization and infection phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIFF4109, but not SCF1, mediates adhesion through cell surface hydrophobicity.
“IFF4109, but not SCF1, mediates adhesion through cell surface hydrophobicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLoss of ALS1 alone reduces Candida albicans adhesion, despite the presence of seven other ALS genes.
“For instance, loss of ALS1 alone reduces Candida albicans adhesion, despite the presence of seven other ALS genes (Fig. S3A) (29).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Candida species, genetic expansion has resulted in the formation of adhesin families containing genes similar in sequence and domain architecture, with adhesive functions that are redundant or specific across family members.
“In Candida species, genetic expansion has resulted in the formation of adhesin families containing genes similar in sequence and domain architecture, with adhesive functions that are redundant or specific across family members (23,24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. auris encodes genes similar to members of the conserved ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin families found across the genus, although these genes may have expanded independently in C. auris and lack clear one-to-one homology with adhesins from well-characterized species.
“C. auris encodes genes similar to members of the conserved ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin families found across the genus, although these genes may have expanded independently in C. auris and lack clear one-to-one homology with adhesins from well-characterized species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (24)(25)(26)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. auris outbreaks are characterized by persistent colonization of patient skin and abiotic surfaces, which can remain positive for extensive periods and serve as a source of contaminative transmission.
“C. auris outbreaks are characterized by persistent colonization of patient skin and abiotic surfaces, which can remain positive for extensive periods and serve as a source of contaminative transmission (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFor fungal pathogens, attachment is largely mediated by cell surface-exposed adhesin proteins.
“For fungal pathogens, attachment is largely mediated by cell surface-exposed adhesin proteins (22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. auris colonizes indwelling medical devices, which act as a risk factor for the development of invasive disease.
“C. auris also colonizes indwelling medical devices, which act as a risk factor for the development of invasive disease (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor bivalve, barnacle, and Vibrio organisms, cation-dependent surface interactions promote adhesion in aqueous and highly ionic environments.
“For these organisms, cation-dependent surface interactions promote adhesion in aqueous and highly ionic environments (36-39).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMediation of hydrophobic interactions is largely conserved among fungal adhesins, consistent with the adhesive mechanism of the conserved IFF4109.
“Mediation of hydrophobic interactions is largely conserved among fungal adhesins, consistent with the adhesive mechanism of the conserved IFF4109 (32)(33)(34).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (32)(33)(34)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior work suggests vaccination or monoclonal antibody therapy targeting Als or Iff/Hyr adhesins may offer protection against lethal C. auris infection.
“Prior work suggests vaccination or monoclonal antibody therapy targeting Als or Iff/Hyr adhesins may offer protection against lethal C. auris infection (27,47).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSequence variation between these two SCF1 alleles does not intrinsically contribute to functional differences in adhesion, and other factors may also influence adhesive capacity.
“These findings show that sequence variation between these two SCF1 alleles does not intrinsically contribute to functional differences in adhesion, and that other factors may also influence adhesive capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWidespread differential regulation of SCF1 was observed among C. auris isolates regardless of clade, suggesting transcriptional control of this adhesin has adapted more recently than clade separation.
“Notably, we observed widespread differential regulation of SCF1 among C. auris isolates regardless of clade, suggesting transcriptional control of this adhesin has adapted more recently than clade separation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSimilar patterns of cation-aromatic clusters are also abundant in some lipid-binding proteins.
“Interestingly, similar patterns of cation-aromatic clusters are also abundant in some lipid-binding proteins (40,43).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationElevated cell surface hydrophobicity promotes affinity for hydrophobic substrates.
“Elevated cell surface hydrophobicity likewise promotes affinity for hydrophobic substrates (33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAdhesive systems in many marine organisms rely on similarly cation-rich proteins, which act through displacement of hydrated ions at the surface-liquid interface or direct cation-π interactions with substrates.
“Adhesive systems in many marine organisms rely on similarly cation-rich proteins, which act through displacement of hydrated ions at the surface-liquid interface or direct cation-π interactions with substrates (36-40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor other Candida species, adhesion to abiotic substrates is often nonspecific, with adhesins promoting affinity for hydrophobic substrates.
“For other Candida species, adhesion to abiotic substrates is often nonspecific, with adhesins promoting affinity for hydrophobic substrates (32)(33)(34).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (32)(33)(34)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. auris encodes genes similar to the conserved ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin families, and proposed models suggest differential utilization of these adhesins may contribute to epidemiological differences among isolates.
“C. auris encodes genes similar to the conserved ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin families, and proposed models suggest differential utilization of these adhesins may contribute to epidemiological differences among isolates (25, 27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBiofilm growth can promote prolonged environmental persistence.
“We measured the importance of these adhesins for biofilm growth, which can promote prolonged environmental persistence (11,(44)(45)(46).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (11,(44)(45)(46)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe C. auris-specific adhesin SCF1 and the conserved adhesin IFF4109 are the principal mediators of association with abiotic surfaces, and additionally contribute substantially to infection and long-term colonization of both biological and abiotic surfaces.
“Our findings suggest the C. aurisspecific adhesin SCF1 and the conserved adhesin IFF4109 are the principal mediators of association with abiotic surfaces, and additionally contribute substantially to infection and long-term colonization of both biological and abiotic surfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDifferential utilization of SCF1 by different isolates suggests an unknown selective pressure may govern its expression.
“Still, differential utilization of SCF1 by different isolates suggests an unknown selective pressure may govern its expression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis ecological niche may have conferred similar selective pressures on adhesion mechanisms.
“C. auris has been isolated from the coastal wetlands of the Andaman Islands and from a Colombian estuary, suggesting a possible marine natural habitat, and this ecological niche may have conferred similar selective pressures on adhesion mechanisms (48,49).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [48]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. auris has been isolated from the coastal wetlands of the Andaman Islands and from a Colombian estuary, suggesting a possible marine natural habitat.
“C. auris has been isolated from the coastal wetlands of the Andaman Islands and from a Colombian estuary, suggesting a possible marine natural habitat, and this ecological niche may have conferred similar selective pressures on adhesion mechanisms (48,49).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [48]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Colonization requires the initial physical association and attachment between fungal cells and substrate.
“Colonization requires the initial physical association and attachment between fungal cells and substrate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Adhesion to polymer substrates is a valid model for surface association and colonization.
“we measured the adhesion between fungal cells and polymer substrates as a model for surface association.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Murine and ex vivo human skin models reflect clinically relevant colonization and disseminated infection in humans.
“we also investigated the importance of these adhesins in disseminated infection.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AlphaFold2 structural predictions reflect the actual structure and adhesive behavior of Scf1.
“we examined the apical N-terminal domain using AlphaFold2, which suggested this domain contains a core Fibronectin-type III fold similar to the FLO11 family of adhesins characterized in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and conserved throughout Ascomycota (Fig. S8A) (32,35).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only 3 ALS genes have been identified in C. auris, unlike C. albicans which contains at least 11 Als adhesins.
“unlike C. albicans, which contains at least 11 Als adhesins, thus far only 3 ALS genes have been identified in C. auris (20, 22).”
From The <i>Candida auris</i> Hog1 MAP kinase is essential for the colonization of murine skin and intradermal persistence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
In “Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1” (page unavailable), the paper describes C. albicans as having ALS1 and seven other ALS genes—eight, rather than the claimed at least eleven. It does not give a count of three ALS genes for C. auris; its count of twelve combines homologs of the ALS and IFF/HYR families. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cell wall adhesin Als4 plays a central role in biofilm formation in C. auris and is required for adhesion to both biotic and abiotic surfaces.
“The cell wall adhesin Als4 plays a central role in biofilm formation in C. auris and is required for adhesion to both biotic and abiotic surfaces11,14,17,50,52.”
From The Wor2 phenotypic switching regulator controls biofilm formation in Candida auris (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In “Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1” (page not provided), the paper reports that, among twelve ALS- and IFF/HYR-family deletion mutants tested, only loss of IFF4109 impaired adhesion to the tested polymer surface. Its summary identifies SCF1—not Als4—as critical for biofilm formation and colonization of biological and abiotic surfaces. The copy therefore contradicts the claim that Als4 is required for adhesion to both kinds of surface. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe murine skin model is widely used to study disease pathogenesis and C. auris-host interactions.
“In addition, understanding the skin immune responses against C. auris is critical, as the murine skin model is widely used to study disease pathogenesis and C. auris-host interactions [4, 16–20].”
From Single-cell transcriptomics unveils skin cell specific antifungal immune responses and IL-1Ra- IL-1R immune evasion strategies of emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
In “SCF1 promotes long-term colonization and virulence” (page unavailable), the paper uses in vivo murine skin to study C. auris colonization and potential interaction with host tissue. It does not establish that the murine skin model is widely used or use that model to study disease pathogenesis; its virulence experiments use intravenous infection instead. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredC. auris possesses a unique cell wall, adhesin proteins, and colonizing factors to thrive in the skin.
“C. auris possesses a unique cell wall, adhesin proteins, and colonizing factors to thrive in the skin [13, 17, 36]”
From Single-cell transcriptomics unveils skin cell specific antifungal immune responses and IL-1Ra- IL-1R immune evasion strategies of emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
The Abstract and Discussion (page not provided) describe C. auris adhesins, including SCF1, that contribute to skin colonization. Our copy does not establish that C. auris has a unique cell wall, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe C. auris genome codes for several species-specific cell surface glycoproteins that may facilitate C. auris adhesion to different substrates.
“the C. auris genome codes for several species-specific cell surface glycoproteins that may facilitate C. auris adhesion to different substrates (20, 22).”
From The <i>Candida auris</i> Hog1 MAP kinase is essential for the colonization of murine skin and intradermal persistence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The 'Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1' section reports multiple adhesin genes, and the Discussion links SCF1 and IFF4109 to association with biological and abiotic surfaces. But the paper identifies SCF1 as the distinctive adhesin and describes IFF4109 as conserved; it does not establish that several of the implicated cell-surface proteins are species-specific glycoproteins. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Keratinocyte adherence varies between representative C. auris strains from four clades.
“we tested the adherence capacity of representative C. auris isolates from four clades (Fig. 1a). Consistent with previous reports on plastic adhesion29 and skin adherence21, we observed variation in keratinocyte adherence between these four representative strains (Fig. 1a).”
From Adhesin Als4112 promotes Candida auris skin colonization through interactions with keratinocytes and extracellular matrix proteins (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
In “C. auris relies on SCF1 for adhesive plasticity” (Fig. 2B; page not available), the paper reports substantial adhesion variation among 23 isolates from all five clades. But that comparison concerns adhesion to polymer surfaces, not keratinocytes; the copy does not establish variation in keratinocyte adherence among the four strains described in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredC. auris exhibits a striking predilection for colonizing the human skin, enabling nosocomial transmission and outbreaks of fungemia and deep-seated infections.
“C. auris exhibits a striking predilection for colonizing the human skin, enabling nosocomial transmission and outbreaks of fungemia and deep-seated infections [3–7].”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
The One-Sentence Summary (page unavailable) links persistent patient-skin colonization to transmission during nosocomial outbreaks, and the Abstract links skin colonization to healthcare-associated outbreaks. The paper also discusses invasive and systemic disease, but these passages do not specifically establish outbreaks of fungemia and deep-seated infections arising from skin colonization. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSantana and colleagues identified a novel adhesin, Scf1, which promotes fungal adhesion to inert abiotic surfaces through cation-dependent interactions and enhances biofilm formation on murine and human skin.
“By performing an elegant forward genetic screen of insertional mutants in C. auris, Santana and colleagues identified a novel adhesin, Scf1 (surface colonizing factor), which promotes fungal adhesion to inert abiotic surfaces through cation-dependent interactions and enhances biofilm formation on murine and human skin [6].”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
The paper’s ‘Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1’ section describes the insertional-mutant screen and identifies Scf1 as an adhesin; its ‘distinct nonspecific mechanisms’ section links Scf1-mediated adhesion to cation–substrate interactions. However, ‘SCF1 promotes long-term colonization and virulence’ reports biofilm formation and colonization of human and murine skin as separate findings. It does not establish biofilm formation on those skin surfaces. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredStrains belonging to clades I and IV uncoordinatedly express SCF1 and ALS4112, with regulation independent among the individual strains.
“Furthermore, strains belonging to clades I and IV uncoordinatedly express SCF1 and ALS4112, with regulation independent among the individual strains.”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports differential regulation of SCF1 among isolates regardless of clade, supporting strain-to-strain variation in SCF1 expression. The Polymer surface attachment section mentions ALS4112 in a functional comparison with SCF1, but does not show that the two genes are expressed uncoordinatedly in clades I and IV or regulated independently among individual strains. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredClade II had low expression of SCF1 and ALS4112, and exhibited low adherence capacity.
“On the other hand, clade II had low expression of SCF1 and ALS4112, and exhibited low adherence capacity.”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In “C. auris relies on SCF1 for adhesive plasticity” (page unavailable), the paper identifies AR0381 as a poorly adhesive clade II isolate and reports that SCF1 expression correlates with adhesion across isolates. It does not establish low SCF1 and ALS4112 expression, or low adherence, for clade II as a whole; its discussion of ALS4112 concerns flocculation and aggregation rather than clade II expression. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAdhesins Scf1, Iff4109, and Als4112 play a vital role in C. auris colonization of the skin.
“suggesting a vital role of these adhesins in C. auris colonization of the skin [6,11].”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In “SCF1 promotes long-term colonization and virulence” (page unavailable), the paper reports that loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 diminished C. auris colonization of human skin explants and murine skin. It does not establish a skin-colonization role for ALS4112; the “Polymer surface attachment” section instead associates ALS4112 overexpression with flocculation and aggregation. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDeletion of Δscf1Δiff4109 and ΔAls4112 significantly reduced skin colonization.
“Moreover, deletion of Δscf1Δiff4109 and ΔAls4112 significantly reduced skin colonization, suggesting a vital role of these adhesins in C. auris colonization of the skin [6,11].”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In “SCF1 promotes long-term colonization and virulence” (page not available), the paper reports that loss of SCF1 and IFF4109 diminished colonization of human skin explants and murine skin. It does not report that deletion of ALS4112 reduced skin colonization; its discussion of ALS4112 concerns flocculation and aggregation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredC. auris strains belonging to clade III highly express SCF1 and ALS4112, associated with greater adherence capacity.
“C. auris strains belonging to clade III highly express SCF1 and ALS4112, associated with greater adherence capacity.”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In “C. auris relies on SCF1 for adhesive plasticity” (page unavailable), SCF1 transcript abundance is positively correlated with adhesion across isolates, but the paper says this variation occurs regardless of clade—not specifically in clade III. In “Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1” (page unavailable), ALS4112 overexpression is associated with flocculation and aggregation, not greater surface adherence. The copy therefore does not support the claimed high expression of both genes in clade III. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe gene expression of SCF1 and ALS4112 varies among different clades and clinical strains of C. auris, and exhibits a strong positive correlation with C. auris adherence activity.
“Recent studies suggest that the gene expression of SCF1 and ALS4112 varies among different clades and clinical strains of C. auris, and exhibits a strong positive correlation with C. auris adherence activity [6,11].”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In “C. auris relies on SCF1 for adhesive plasticity” (Fig. 2D; page unavailable), SCF1 transcript abundance is strongly positively correlated with adhesion across isolates from all five clades. The paper does not report the same expression–adhesion correlation for ALS4112; its “Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1” section instead links ALS4112 overexpression to flocculation and aggregation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAdhesion to inert surface in UME6HA is essentially triggered by Scf1.
“Adhesion to inert surface was essentially triggered by Scf1.”
From Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
The section “Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1” reports that deleting SCF1 substantially reduced C. auris adhesion to polystyrene microspheres and restoring it rescued adhesion. That supports Scf1’s role in attachment to an inert surface, but the cited passages do not establish the claim specifically in UME6HA. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredC. auris displays at least three Als-like, eight Hyr/Iff-like, and one species-specific adhesin (Scf1).
“C. auris displays at least three Als-like, eight Hyr/Iff-like, and one species-specific adhesin (Scf1) (27, 53–55) (Table S3).”
From Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
In “Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1” (page not specified), the paper reports twelve genes homologous to the ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin families, but does not give the claimed breakdown of at least three Als-like and eight Hyr/Iff-like genes. The Discussion calls SCF1 a C. auris-specific adhesin; the “adhesive plasticity” section qualifies this by identifying an SCF1 homolog in C. haemulonii and describing reliance on SCF1 for adhesion as specific to C. auris. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredScf1 is unique to C. auris and has a different adhesion mechanism compared to other adhesins.
“Scf1 is unique to C. auris and has a different adhesion mechanism compared to other adhesins (27).”
From Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
The section “SCF1 and IFF4109 have distinct nonspecific mechanisms” reports that Scf1-mediated adhesion is not dependent on hydrophobicity, supporting the mechanism comparison. However, “C. auris relies on SCF1 for adhesive plasticity” identifies a functional SCF1 homolog in C. haemulonii. Reliance on SCF1 for adhesion is specific to C. auris, but Scf1 itself is not unique to that species. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCandida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant skin-tropic fungal pathogen that causes serious human infections.
“Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant skin-tropic fungal pathogen that causes serious human infections.”
From The Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris Induces IFNγ to Colonize the Skin (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
C. auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that can cause serious human infections.
“C. auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that can cause serious human infections [1,5,38,39].”
From The Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris Induces IFNγ to Colonize the Skin (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Both SCF1 and IFF4109 are functionally redundant for biofilm formation.
“Both SCF1 and IFF4109 are functionally redundant for biofilm formation (22)”
From The <i>Candida auris</i> Hog1 MAP kinase is essential for the colonization of murine skin and intradermal persistence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Scf1 and IFF4109 were recently identified for their roles in surface colonization, adhesion, and virulence.
“a C. auris-specific adhesin, Scf1, and the Iff family member, B9J08_004109 (IFF4109), were recently identified for their roles in surface colonization, adhesion, and virulence (22).”
From The <i>Candida auris</i> Hog1 MAP kinase is essential for the colonization of murine skin and intradermal persistence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The genome of C. auris contains adhesins belonging to the ALS and IFF/HYR families.
“The genome of C. auris is reported to contain adhesins belonging to ALS and the IFF/HYR family (20, 22).”
From The <i>Candida auris</i> Hog1 MAP kinase is essential for the colonization of murine skin and intradermal persistence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
C. auris adhesins Scf1 and Iff4109 promote skin colonization and disease.
“Our recent study demonstrated the role of two adhesins, Scf1 and Iff4109, in promoting skin colonization and disease29.”
From Adhesin Als4112 promotes Candida auris skin colonization through interactions with keratinocytes and extracellular matrix proteins (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
IFF4109 has previously been implicated in C. auris systemic infection.
“Notably, IFF4109 has previously been implicated in C. auris systemic infection29.”
From Adhesin Als4112 promotes Candida auris skin colonization through interactions with keratinocytes and extracellular matrix proteins (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Whole-genome sequencing and insertion mapping identified an insertion in B9J08_004112, encoding the ALS adhesin Als4112, and in B9J08_003899, encoding a Mub1 homolog.
“We used whole-genome sequencing and insertion mapping to identify an insertion in the gene B9J08_004112, which encodes an ALS adhesin protein on the cell surface, referred to as Als411229, and in the gene B9J08_003899, which encodes a protein homologous to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mub1 protein, a subunit of a ubiquitin ligase complex44.”
From Adhesin Als4112 promotes Candida auris skin colonization through interactions with keratinocytes and extracellular matrix proteins (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Previously, the authors reported that C. auris adhesins Scf1 and Iff4109 contribute to skin colonization.
“Previously, we reported that two C. auris adhesins, Scf1 and Iff4109, contribute to skin colonization29”
From Adhesin Als4112 promotes Candida auris skin colonization through interactions with keratinocytes and extracellular matrix proteins (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Unlike other Candida species, C. auris exhibits a distinct capacity for persistent skin colonization.
“Unlike other Candida species, C. auris exhibits a distinct capacity for persistent skin colonization.”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
SCF1 functions redundantly with the adhesin IFF4109, as their double deletion in the Δscf1 Δiff4109 mutant strain significantly decreased skin colonization.
“SCF1 functions redundantly with the adhesin IFF4109, a member of the IFF/HYR adhesin family, as their double deletion in the Δscf1 Δiff4109 mutant strain significantly decreased skin colonization.”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
SCF1 expression varies between C. auris clades and within strains of the same clade and correlates with adhesive capacity; SCF1 expression is low in the poorly adherent strain AR0387 and elevated in the highly adherent strain AR0382.
“Notably, SCF1 expression varies between C. auris clades and within strains of the same clade and correlates with adhesive capacity; thus, SCF1 expression is low in the poorly adherent strain AR0387 and elevated in the highly adherent strain AR0382.”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Overexpression of SCF1 in the poorly adherent strain AR0387 restored its adherence capacity and increased its colonization potential in murine and human skin.
“Furthermore, overexpression of SCF1 in the poorly adherent strain AR0387 restored its adherence capacity and increased its colonization potential in murine and human skin [6].”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Scf1 plays a crucial role in adhesion to inert surfaces.
“These data confirm the crucial role of Scf1 in adhesion to inert surfaces as recently described (27, 40).”
From Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Scf1 plays a crucial role in adhesion and biofilm formation.
“The crucial role of Scf1 in adhesion and biofilm formation has been recently demonstrated (27, 40).”
From Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure 2D cites the wrong source panel for the 23 isolates
MinorThe Figure 2 legend says the 23 isolates plotted in panel D are from panel A, but panel A depicts genomic synteny. The legend identifies the 23-isolate adhesion measurements as panel B.
“(D) SCF1 transcript abundance (top panel) but not IFF4109 transcript abundance (bottom panel) is associated with adhesion to polystyrene in the same 23 C. auris isolates from (A).”
“(B) Adhesion of 23 C. auris clinical isolates from all 5 clades.”
SCF1 is described as C. auris-specific despite a homolog in C. haemulonii
MinorThe abstract says SCF1 is apparently specific to C. auris, but the results identify a functional SCF1 homolog in C. haemulonii. The paper separately says that reliance on SCF1 for adhesion, rather than the adhesin itself, is specific to C. auris.
“SCF1 is apparently specific to C. auris and its expression mediates adhesion to inert and biological surfaces across isolates from all five clades.”
“Although the C. haemulonii SCF1 homolog functionally complements Δscf1 in C. auris, it is not essential for adhesion in C. haemulonii”
SCF1 is called required for biofilm formation despite redundant function
MinorThe abstract says SCF1 is required for biofilm formation, whereas the results say deletion of both SCF1 and IFF4109 was required to ablate biofilm formation in AR0382. Thus, SCF1 deletion alone did not abolish that phenotype.
“SCF1 is required for C. auris biofilm formation, skin colonization, virulence in systemic infection, and colonization of inserted medical devices.”
“The two adhesins were functionally redundant, and deletion of both was required to ablate biofilm formation in AR0382”
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890 · see citing works
Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., & Usadel, B. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · Cited by 65,548 · see citing works
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Martin, M. (2011) · EMBnet.journal · doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · Cited by 33,889 · see citing works
featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., & Shi, W. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · Cited by 27,219 · see citing works
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · see citing works
Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction
Ye, J., Coulouris, G., Zaretskaya, I., Cutcutache, I., Rozen, S., & Madden, T. (2012) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-134 · Cited by 6,138 · see citing works
The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update
Afgan, E., Baker, D., Batut, B., van den Beek, M., Bouvier, D., Čech, M., Chilton, J., Clements, D., Coraor, N., Grüning, B. A., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky379 · Cited by 3,662 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · Cited by 2,598 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity
Rosenberg, M., Gutnick, D. L., & ROSENBERG, E. B. (1980) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/0378-1097(80)90106-8 · Cited by 2,334
Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity
Rosenberg, M., Gutnick, D. L., & ROSENBERG, E. B. (1980) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1980.tb05599.x · Cited by 2,298 · see citing works
CellProfiler™: Free, Versatile Software for Automated Biological Image Analysis
Lamprecht, M. R., Sabatini, D. M., & Carpenter, A. E. (2007) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000112257 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
PIP<sub>2</sub>and Proteins: Interactions, Organization, and Information Flow
McLaughlin, S., Wang, J., Gambhir, A., & Murray, D. (2002) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.31.082901.134259 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Adaptive synergy between catechol and lysine promotes wet adhesion by surface salt displacement
Maier, G. P., Rapp, M. V., Waite, J. H., Israelachvili, J. N., & Butler, A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab0556 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Staphylococcus δ-toxin induces allergic skin disease by activating mast cells
Nakamura, Y., Oscherwitz, J., Cease, K. B., Chan, S. M., Muñoz-Planillo, R., Hasegawa, M., Villaruz, A. E., Cheung, G. Y. C., McGavin, M. J., Travers, J. B., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12655 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
A <i>Candida auris</i> Outbreak and Its Control in an Intensive Care Setting
Eyre, D. W., Sheppard, A. E., Madder, H., Moir, I., Moroney, R., Quan, T. P., Griffiths, D., George, S., Butcher, L., Morgan, M., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1714373 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Andes, D., Nett, J., Oschel, P., Albrecht, R., Marchillo, K., & Pitula, A. (2004) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.72.10.6023-6031.2004 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Self-citationAdjacent cationic–aromatic sequences yield strong electrostatic adhesion of hydrogels in seawater
Fan, H., Wang, J., Tao, Z., Huang, J., Rao, P., Kurokawa, T., & Gong, J. P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13171-9 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
FungiDB: An Integrated Bioinformatic Resource for Fungi and Oomycetes
Basenko, E. Y., Pulman, J. A., Shanmugasundram, A., Harb, O. S., Crouch, K., Starns, D., Warrenfeltz, S. W., Aurrecoechea, C., Stoeckert, C. J., Kissinger, J. C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof4010039 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Adhesins in human fungal pathogens: glue with plenty of stick.
de Groot, P. W. J., Bader, O., de Boer, A. D., Weig, M., & Chauhan, N. (2013) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00364-12 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Vallabhaneni, S., Kallen, A., Tsay, S., Chow, N., Welsh, R., Kerins, J., Kemble, S. K., Pacilli, M., Black, S. R., Landon, E., et al. (2016) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6544e1 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Chow, N. A., Gade, L., Tsay, S. V., Forsberg, K., Greenko, J. A., Southwick, K. L., Barrett, P. M., Kerins, J. L., Lockhart, S. R., Chiller, T. M., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30597-8 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Worsening Spread of <i>Candida auris</i> in the United States, 2019 to 2021
Lyman, M., Forsberg, K., Sexton, D. J., Chow, N. A., Lockhart, S. R., Jackson, B. R., & Chiller, T. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m22-3469 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
<i>Candida auris</i> in Healthcare Facilities, New York, USA, 2013–2017
Adams, E., Quinn, M., Tsay, S., Poirot, E., Chaturvedi, S., Southwick, K., Greenko, J., Fernandez, R., Kallen, A., Vallabhaneni, S., et al. (2018) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2410.180649 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Sokalingam, S., Raghunathan, G., Soundrarajan, N., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040410 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Kim, S., Yoo, H. Y., Huang, J. S., Lee, Y., Park, S., Park, Y., Jin, S., Jung, Y. M., Zeng, H., Hwang, D. S., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b01370 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Portrait of Candida albicans Adherence Regulators
Finkel, J. S., Xu, W., Huang, D., Hill, E. M., Desai, J. V., Woolford, C. A., Nett, J. E., Taff, H., Norice, C. T., Andes, D. R., et al. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002525 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Self-citationEnvironmental Isolation of Candida auris from the Coastal Wetlands of Andaman Islands, India
Arora, P., Singh, P., Wang, Y., Yadav, A., Pawar, K., Singh, A., Padmavati, G., Xu, J., & Chowdhary, A. (2021) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.03181-20 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Kean, R., Delaney, C., Sherry, L., Borman, A., Johnson, E. M., Richardson, M. D., Rautemaa-Richardson, R., Williams, C., & Ramage, G. (2018) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00334-18 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Proctor, D. M., Dangana, T., Sexton, D. J., Fukuda, C., Yelin, R. D., Stanley, M., Bell, P. B., Baskaran, S., Deming, C., Chen, Q., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01383-w · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Contact Angle of Water on Polystyrene Thin Films: Effects of CO 2 Environment and Film Thickness
Li, Y., Pham, J. Q., Johnston, K. P., & Green, P. F. (2007) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la0636311 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
The NDV-3A vaccine protects mice from multidrug resistant Candida auris infection
Singh, S., Uppuluri, P., Mamouei, Z., Alqarihi, A., Elhassan, H., French, S., Lockhart, S. R., Chiller, T., Edwards, J. E., & Ibrahim, A. S. (2019) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007460 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationCandida auris Forms High-Burden Biofilms in Skin Niche Conditions and on Porcine Skin
Horton, M. V., Johnson, C. J., Kernien, J. F., Patel, T. D., Lam, B. C., Cheong, J. Z. A., Meudt, J. J., Shanmuganayagam, D., Kalan, L. R., & Nett, J. E. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00910-19 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationIn Vitro Culturing and Screening of Candida albicans Biofilms
Gulati, M., Lohse, M. B., Ennis, C. L., Gonzalez, R. E., Perry, A. M., Bapat, P. S., Arevalo, A. V., Rodríguez, D. L., & Nobile, C. J. (2018) · Current Protocols in Microbiology · doi:10.1002/cpmc.60 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Chakrabarti, A., & Sood, P. (2021) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001318 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Clade-specific chromosomal rearrangements and loss of subtelomeric adhesins in <i>Candida auris</i>
Muñoz, J. F., Welsh, R. M., Shea, T., Batra, D., Gade, L., Howard, D., Rowe, L. A., Meis, J. F., Litvintseva, A. P., & Cuomo, C. A. (2021) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab029 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Comparative Genome Analysis and Gene Finding in Candida Species Using CGOB
Maguire, S. L., hÉigeartaigh, S. Ó., Byrne, K. P., Schröder, M., Gaora, P. Ó., Wolfe, K. H., & Butler, G. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst042 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Biochemistry of Barnacle Adhesion: An Updated Review
Liang, C., Strickland, J. V., Ye, Z., Wu, W.-J., Hu, B.-R., & Rittschof, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00565 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Pacilli, M., Kerins, J. L., Clegg, W. J., Walblay, K. A., Adil, H., Kemble, S. K., Xydis, S., McPherson, T. D., Lin, M. Y., Hayden, M. K., et al. (2020) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa435 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Nobrega de Almeida, J., Brandão, I. B., Francisco, E. C., de Almeida, S. L. R., de Oliveira Dias, P., Pereira, F. M., Santos Ferreira, F., de Andrade, T. S., de Miranda Costa, M. M., de Souza Jordão, R. T., et al. (2021) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/myc.13320 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Santana, D. J., & O’Meara, T. R. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27545-5 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationShort, B., Brown, J., Delaney, C., Sherry, L., Williams, C., Ramage, G., & Kean, R. (2019) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.06.006 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Lutgring, J. D., Machado, M.-J., Benahmed, F. H., Conville, P. S., Shawar, R. M., Patel, J. B., & Brown, A. C. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01415-17 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
The comparative efficacy of antiseptics against Candida auris biofilms
Kean, R., McKloud, E., Townsend, E. M., Sherry, L., Delaney, C., Jones, B., Williams, C., & Ramage, G. (2018) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.05.007 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Bing, J., Guan, Z., Zheng, T., Zhang, Z., Fan, S., Ennis, C. L., Nobile, C. J., & Huang, G. (2023) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011239 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Sexton, D. J., Bentz, M. L., Welsh, R. M., Derado, G., Furin, W., Rose, L. J., Noble-Wang, J., Pacilli, M., McPherson, T. D., Black, S., et al. (2021) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciab327 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Environmental reservoirs of the drug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris
Akinbobola, A., Kean, R., Hanifi, S. M. A., & Quilliam, R. S. (2023) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011268 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Dire, O., Ahmad, A., Duze, S., & Patel, M. (2023) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2023.04.007 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
<i>Candida auris</i>‒Associated Hospitalizations, United States, 2017–2022
Benedict, K., Forsberg, K., Gold, J. A. W., Baggs, J., & Lyman, M. (2023) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2907.230540 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Vila, T., Montelongo-Jauregui, D., Ahmed, H., Puthran, T., Sultan, A. S., & Jabra-Rizk, M. A. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00760-20 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Novel Environmental Niches for Candida auris: Isolation from a Coastal Habitat in Colombia
Escandón, P. (2022) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof8070748 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Force Nanoscopy of Hydrophobic Interactions in the Fungal Pathogen Candida glabrata
El‐Kirat‐Chatel, S., Beaussart, A., Derclaye, S., Alsteens, D., Kucharíková, S., Dijck, P. V., & Dufrêne, Y. F. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn506370f · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Kraushaar, T., Brückner, S., Veelders, M., et al. (2015) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2015.03.021 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Vinayagamoorthy, K., Pentapati, K. C., & Prakash, H. (2022) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/myc.13447 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Veri, A. O., Miao, Z., Shapiro, R. S., Tebbji, F., O’Meara, T. R., Kim, S. H., Colazo, J., Tan, K., Vyas, V. K., Whiteway, M., et al. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007270 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationHuang, X., Nero, T., Weerasekera, R., Matej, K., Hinbest, A., Jiang, Z., Lee, R. F., Wu, L., Chak, C., Nijjer, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37660-0 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Advanced Assay Development Guidelines for Image-Based High Content Screening and Analysis
Bray, M., & Carpenter, A. E. (2012) · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Hidden complexity of synergistic roles of Dopa and lysine for strong wet adhesion
Li, Y., Liang, C., Gao, L., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Cao, Y. (2017) · Materials Chemistry Frontiers · doi:10.1039/c7qm00402h · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Candida auris undergoes adhesin-dependent and -independent cellular aggregation
Pelletier, C., Shaw, S., Alsayegh, S., Brown, A. J. P., & Lorenz, A. (2024) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012076 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Kin discrimination in social yeast is mediated by cell surface receptors of the Flo11 adhesin family
Brückner, S., Schubert, R., Kraushaar, T., Hartmann, R., Hoffmann, D. E., Jelli, E., Drescher, K., Müller, D. J., Essen, L., & Mösch, H. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.55587 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Eix, E. F., Johnson, C. J., Wartman, K. M., Kernien, J. F., Meudt, J. J., Shanmuganayagam, D., Gibson, A. L. F., & Nett, J. E. (2022) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiac094 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationCandida auris from colonisation to candidemia: A four‐year study
Bayona, J. V. M., Tormo, N., García, C. S., Serrano, M. D. R. G., & Cardona, C. G. (2023) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/myc.13626 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Singh, S., Barbarino, A., Youssef, E. G., Coleman, D., Gebremariam, T., & Ibrahim, A. (2023) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof9010103 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationCloth Lanyards as a Source of Intermittent Transmission of Candida auris on an ICU*
Patterson, C. A., Wyncoll, D., Patel, A., Ceesay, Y., Newsholme, W., Chand, M., Mitchell, H., Tan, M., & Edgeworth, J. D. (2021) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004843 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Valotteau, C., Prystopiuk, V., Cormack, B. P., & Dufrêne, Y. F. (2019) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00277-19 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Diversity of GPI-anchored fungal adhesins
Essen, L., Vogt, M. S., & Mösch, H. (2020) · Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1515/hsz-2020-0199 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Parallel expansion and divergence of an adhesin family in pathogenic yeasts
Smoak, R. A., Snyder, L. F., Fassler, J. S., & He, B. Z. (2023) · GENETICS · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad024 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ashkenazi‐Hoffnung, L., & Danziger, C. R. (2023) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof9020176 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
COVID-19 and C. auris: A Case-Control Study from a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon
Allaw, F., Haddad, S. F., Habib, N., Moukarzel, P., Naji, N. S., Kanafani, Z. A., Ibrahim, A., Zahreddine, N. K., Spernovasilis, N. A., Poulakou, G., et al. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10051011 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationA novel flow cytometric protocol for assessment of yeast cell adhesion
Silva‐Dias, A., Miranda, I. M., Rocha, R., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Salvador, A., Rodrigues, A. G., & Pina‐Vaz, C. (2012) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.21170 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Oh, S.-H., Schliep, K. P., Isenhower, A., Rodriguez-Bobadilla, R., Vuong, V. M., Fields, C. J., Hernandez, A. G., & Hoyer, L. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.794529 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
An effective and rapid method for RNA preparation from non-conventional yeast species
Lee, D. W., Hong, C. P., & Kang, H. A. (2019) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2019.113408 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Genetic Evaluation of Nosocomial Candida auris Transmission
Roberts, S. C., Zembower, T., Ozer, E. A., & Qi, C. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02252-20 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Park, S. O., Frazer, C., & Bennett, R. J. (2022) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00347-22 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Rajni, E., Jain, A., Gupta, S., Jangid, Y., & Vohra, R. (2022) · Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove Czech Republic) · doi:10.14712/18059694.2022.23 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Candida auris undergoes adhesin-dependent and -independent cellular aggregation
Pelletier, C., Shaw, S., Alsayegh, S., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.21.537817 · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lass‐Flörl, C., Kanj, S. S., Govender, N. P., Thompson, G. R., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L. L., & Govrins, M. A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-024-00503-3 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
<i>Candida auris</i> Infections
Lionakis, M. S., & Chowdhary, A. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2402635 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Bloodstream infections: mechanisms of pathogenesis and opportunities for intervention
Holmes, C. L., Albin, O. R., Mobley, H. L. T., & Bachman, M. A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-024-01105-2 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Fungal biofilms in human health and disease
Ramage, G., Kean, R., Rautemaa-Richardson, R., Williams, C., & Lopez-Ribot, J. L. (2025) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-025-01147-0 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Mechanisms of pathogenicity for the emerging fungus Candida auris
Horton, M. V., Holt, A. M., & Nett, J. E. (2023) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011843 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationThe many faces of Candida auris: Phenotypic and strain variation in an emerging pathogen
Santana, D. J., Zhao, G., & O’Meara, T. R. (2024) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012011 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, T. W., Sofras, D., Montelongo-Jauregui, D., Paiva, T. O., Carolus, H., Dufrêne, Y. F., Alfaifi, A. A., McCracken, C., Bruno, V. M., Van Dijck, P., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53588-5 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Comprehensive Overview of Candida auris : An Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Fungal Pathogen
Kim, J.-S., Cha, H., & Bahn, Y. (2024) · Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.4014/jmb.2404.04040 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Candida auris undergoes adhesin-dependent and -independent cellular aggregation
Pelletier, C., Shaw, S., Alsayegh, S., Brown, A. J. P., & Lorenz, A. (2024) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012076 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Aggregation and clustering could potentially be causes for long-term persistence of fungal cells in the host and thereby contribute to increased virulence.”
BackgroundSokou, R., Palioura, A. E., Taliaka, P. K., Konstantinidi, A., Tsantes, A. G., Piovani, D., Tsante, K. A., Gounari, E. A., Iliodromiti, Z., Boutsikou, Τ., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13061586 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“C. auris adheres to the skin due to a unique agent it possesses which does not exist in other Candida species called Surface Colonization Factor (Scf1) [64].”
BackgroundZhao, G., Lyu, J., Veniaminova, N. A., Zarnowski, R., Mattos, E., Johnson, C. J., Quintanilla, D., Hautau, H., Hold, L. A., Xu, B., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60876-1 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Human skin colonization was performed as previously described 29 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationCandida auris: Epidemiology Update and a Review of Strategies to Prevent Spread
Hayes, J. F. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13226675 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Pathogenesis, Prophylaxis, and Treatment of Candida auris
Preda, M., Chivu, R. D., Diţu, L.-M., Popescu, O., & Manolescu, L. S. C. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12030561 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“The functions of certain adhesins for C. albicans and other Candida species have been extensively documented [24], while for C. auris are still described, and some seem to be specific, for example, Surface Colonization Factor (Scf1) and a conserved adhesin, Iff4109 [25].”
New antifungal strategies and drug development against WHO critical priority fungal pathogens
Li, Y., Liu, Y., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y., Ni, W., Zhang, W., & Tan, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1662442 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Balakumar, A., Das, D., Datta, A., Mishra, A., Bryak, G., Ganesh, S. M., Netea, M. G., Kumar, V., Lionakis, M. S., Arora, D., et al. (2024) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012699 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Given that C. auris possesses a unique cell wall, adhesin proteins, and colonizing factors to thrive in the skin [13, 17, 36], understanding the cell-type specific skin immune response to C. auris is critical to understanding the pathogenesis.”
Shivarathri, R., Chauhan, M., Datta, A., Das, D., Karuli, A., Aptekmann, A., Jenull, S., Kuchler, K., Thangamani, S., Chowdhary, A., et al. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02748-24 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
White-Brown switching controls phenotypic plasticity and virulence of Candida auris
Phan-Canh, T., Jenull, S., Bitencourt, T. A., Seiser, S., Moser, D., Motamedi, M., Chowdhary, A., Elbe‐Bürger, A., & Kuchler, K. (2025) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115976 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i>
Louvet, M., Li, J., Brandalise, D., Bachmann, D., Sala de Oyanguren, F., Labes, D., Jacquier, N., Genoud, C., Mucciolo, A., Coste, A. T., et al. (2024) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01531-24 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Zhang, W., Cao, X., Liu, C., & Gao, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1694108 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Cha, H., Won, D., & Bahn, Y.-S. (2025) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02475-23 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris Induces IFNγ to Colonize the Skin
Das, D., Ganesh, S. M., Mishra, A., Netea, M. G., & Thangamani, S. (2025) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1013114 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“C. auris was recently classified within the critical priority fungal pathogens group by the World Health Organization (WHO) and categorized as an urgent threat by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [1–5].”
Innate immune response to Candida auris
Holt, A. M., & Nett, J. E. (2024) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2024.102510 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationBiofilm-associated metabolism via ERG251 in Candida albicans
Xiong, L., de Sá, N. P., Żarnowski, R., Huang, M. Y., Fernandes, C. M., Lanni, F., Andes, D. R., Poeta, M. D., & Mitchell, A. P. (2024) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012225 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent Perspectives of Antifungal Therapy: A Special Focus on Candida auris
Arumugam, G., Muthuselvam, M., de Lima, P. M. N., Rajendran, R., & Junqueira, J. C. (2024) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof10060408 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Its mechanism of action was associated with the collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential by targeting respiratory chain enzymatic complexes III and IV of the yeast [39–41].”
BackgroundLiu, Z., Yang, H., Huang, R., Li, X., Sun, T., & Zhu, L. (2025) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00284-24 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2025) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.01.063 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Yeast and filamentous <i>Candida auris</i> stimulate distinct immune responses in the skin
Bryak, G., Cox, A., Lionakis, M. S., & Thangamani, S. (2024) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00055-24 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Alvarado, M., Navajas, J. A. G., Muñoz, M. T. B., Gómez-Molero, E., Fernández-Sánchez, S., Eraso, E., Munro, C. A., Valentı́n, E., Mateo, E., & de Groot, P. W. J. (2024) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/foae039 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“In C. auris , consistent with earlier reports (Santana et al. 2023 , Smoak et al. 2023 ), our GPI pipeline identified three Als and nine Hyr/Iff proteins.”
InfluentialThe adhesin SCF1 mediates Candida auris colonization
Balakumar, A., Bernstein, D., & Thangamani, S. (2024) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2023.10.008 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Candida auris : host interactions, antifungal drug resistance, and diagnostics
Chowdhary, A., Lionakis, M. S., & Chauhan, N. (2025) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00187-22 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“This plays a fundamental role in maintaining a stable skin colonization, which can lead to increased pathogenicity (131).”
InfluentialAdvanced genetic techniques in fungal pathogen research
Ross, R. L., & Santiago-Tirado, F. H. (2024) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00643-23 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…were not surprising, the development of accessible and efficient forward and reverse genetic tools paved the way for the discovery of a unique C. auris adhesin that regulates surface colonization and virulence, the two main factors driving the explosive incidence and outbreaks of this fungus (25).”
BackgroundMethodSuppressing the virulence factors of Candida auris with baicalein through multifaceted mechanisms
Li, C., Wang, J., Li, H., Wang, Y., Wu, H., Wei, W., Wu, D., Shao, J., Wang, T., & Wang, C. (2024) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-024-04038-9 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Adhesion is facilitated by genes expressing adhesins, among which is the Surface Colonization Factor ( SCF1 ), a distinct and prominent adhesion binding to various surfaces through cation-dependent interactions (Santana et al. 2023).”
Mutations in TAC1B drive increased CDR1 and MDR1 expression and azole resistance in Candida auris
Barker, K. S., Santana, D. J., Zhang, Q. H., Peters, T. L., Rybak, J. M., Morschhäuser, J., Cuomo, C. A., & Rogers, P. D. (2025) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00300-25 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationNicklas, J. P., Deming, C., Lee-Lin, S., Conlan, S., Shen, Z., Blaustein, R. A., & Segre, J. A. (2026) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.03117-25 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Vertebrate and invertebrate animal infection models of Candida auris pathogenicity
Martinez, M., Garsin, D. A., & Lorenz, M. C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2024.102506 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kovács, F., Jakab, Á., Balla, N., Tóth, Z., Balázsi, D., Forgács, L., Harmath, A., Bozó, A., Ragyák, Á. Z., Majoros, L., et al. (2025) · Biofilm · doi:10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100259 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“SCF1 is crucial for attachment to abiotic surfaces, skin, and biofilm formation in C. auris , and its downregulation may explain the reduced adhesion and biofilm formation observed in HSL-treated cells [42].”
Differential susceptibility of Candida (Candidozyma) auris clades to surface disinfectants
Lang, A., Gabriel, H., Meister, T. L., Meis, J. F. G. M., Steinmann, E., Brill, F. H. H., & Steinmann, J. (2025) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2025.10.003 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Singh, S., Youssef, E. G., Barbarino, A. M., Hautau, H., Nabeela, S., Gebremariam, T., Alkhazraji, S., Ostroff, G. R., Christensen, D., Cochrane, T., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-32488-8 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationBing, J., Li, S., Ji, L., Du, H., Shamoon, N. M., Nobile, C. J., & Huang, G. (2026) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00394-25 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Gifford, H., Bedekovic, T., Helmstetter, N., Gregory, J., Ma, Q., Brand, A., Wilson, D., Rhodes, J. L., Ramsdale, M., Kudoh, T., et al. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-09321-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
De-la-Pinta, I., Marcos‐Arias, C., Sevillano, E., Eraso, E., & Quindós, G. (2026) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms14020367 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“This aggregation constitutes an adaptive survival strategy mediated by Als/Iff-family adhesins, including lineage-specific proteins such as Iff4109 and Scf1 [62,63].”
Candida albicans Goliath cells pioneer biofilm formation
Kalinina, I. M., & Wilson, D. (2025) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.03425-24 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Interestingly, this biophysical property has recently been shown to mediate Candida auris adhesion (36).”
Merrill, E. D., Prudent, V., Basso, P., Rapp, E., Moghadam, P., Rodriguez, A., Hung, E., Hurabielle, C., Cheng, J., Cho, R. J., et al. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adu6688 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Yang, L., Hong, K., Luo, J., Wang, L., Zhang, L., Jiang, L., Peng, Q., & Guo, J. (2025) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s490696 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Gerges, B., Rosenblatt, J. S., Truong, Y.-L., Jiang, Y., & RAAD, I. I. (2025) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof11030178 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Endophytic fungi-bioinspired nanoparticles potential to control infectious disease
Khan, S., Mathur, A., & Khan, F. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040841x.2025.2497795 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…2023). these adhes-ins exhibit diverse functions, including biofilm formation, host recognition, and cellular signaling (Huang et al. 2023; Santana et al. 2023). in human pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus , adhesins facilitate binding to extracellular matrix proteins, contributing…”
Arslan, E., Turan, D., Karaşahin, Ö., Çaydaşı, Ö., Olçar, Y., Tekin, M. D., Adıyeke, E., Karadağ, F. Y., & Öztürk-Engin, D. (2025) · Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1080/23744235.2025.2546482 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The emerging pathogen Candida auris: host interactions and disease drivers
Sanya, D. R. A., Arevalo, A. V., Onésime, D., & Nobile, C. J. (2026) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-026-01230-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The C. auris -specific adhesin Scf1, essential for colonization, biofilm formation, and virulence, emerges as a particularly promising vaccine or therapeutic target [194].”
The emerging fungal pathogen <i>Candida auris</i> induces IFNγ to colonize mammalian hair follicles
Merrill, E. D., Prudent, V., Moghadam, P., Rodriguez, A., Hurabielle, C., Wells, E. K. C., Basso, P., Scharschmidt, T. C., Rosenblum, M. D., Molofsky, A. B., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.15.632653 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Meanwhile, basic research on C. auris skin colonization remains in its infancy, and two fungal adhesins (Scf1 and Iff4109) are the only molecules known to facilitate the interaction of C. auris with mammalian skin 39 .”
Shbeta, M., Kopp, T., Voronov, I., Yona, A., Afana, R. H., Carmeli, S., & Fridman, M. (2025) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202521135 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Growth phase influences virulence in Candidozyma auris systemic infection models
McFadden, M. J., Anku, J. A. E., Davis, F. A., Luke, C. E., Andrea, T., & O’Meara, T. R. (2025) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00767-25 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationMattos, E. C., Gupta, K. D., Quintanilla, D., Hautau, H., Ibrahim, A. S., & Singh, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1731315 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationTrk1 potassium transport is crucial for effective Candidozyma auris skin colonization
Glawe, A. J., Eix, E. F., Johnson, C. J., Żarnowski, R., Andes, M. K., Lazarcik, J., Henzler‐Wildman, K. A., & Nett, J. E. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2602824123 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationPathogenicity and virulence of Candida auris
Phan-Canh, T., Seiser, S., Chauhan, M., Kuchler, K., Chauhan, N., & Elbe‐Bürger, A. (2026) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2026.2707827 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yang, G., Yang, R., Zhu, X., Xu, Q., Niu, X., Miao, C., Wei, W., Wang, C., Wang, T., & Wu, D. (2025) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00222-25 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Toit, A. D. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-023-00986-z · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hope on the Horizon? Aptamers in Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections
Khodavaisy, S., & Xu, J. (2024) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes15060733 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“In addition to BDG, other species-specific cell surface molecules, such as Galactomannan (GM) in Aspergillus spp., glucuronoxylomannan polysaccharide (GXM) in Cryptococcus spp., and surface colonization factor (SCF1) in C. auris, could be potential targets for aptamer binding [27,28].”
BackgroundSurviving the Storm: How Candida Species Master Adaptation for Pathogenesis
Rana, A., Gupta, N., Asif, S., & Thakur, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4909-6_5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Diagnostic and clinical management of Candida auris infections in immunocompromised patients
Posteraro, B., Cosio, T., Torelli, R., Carolis, E. D., Magrì, C., Posteraro, P., Angelis, G. D., & Sanguinetti, M. (2025) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1080/14787210.2025.2505567 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“A recently characterized adhesin, the surface colonization factor Scf1, is implicated in biofilm formation, skin and device colonization, and increased virulence during invasive infection [38].”
Mathur, K., Singh, B., Puria, R., & Nain, V. (2024) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-024-03969-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Recently role of ALS4 and SCF1 in adhesion is unveiled (Bing et al. 2023; Santana et al. 2023).”
Carbon Dioxide Controls Fungal Fitness and Skin Tropism of Candida aurisPreprint
Phan-Canh, T., Penninger, P., Seiser, S., Khunweeraphong, N., Moser, D., Bitencourt, T. A., Arzani, H., Chen, W., Zenz, L.-M., Knarr, A., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.12.589292 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin
Thangamani, S., Balakumar, A., Datta, A., Bryak, G., & Lionakis, M. S. (2026) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1014075 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Furthermore, overexpression of SCF1 in the poorly adherent strain AR0387 restored its adherence capacity and increased its colonization potential in murine and human skin [6].”
InfluentialNarayanan, A., Shaji, A. A., Pullepu, D., Bhattacharya, J., & Sanyal, K. (2025) · ACS Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.5c00081 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Stergiou, K. I., Skourtsidis, K., Kiosis, G., Ioannou, D., Tseriotis, V., Fouskas, V., Karachrysafi, S., Iosifidis, Ε., Roilides, E., Papamitsou, T., et al. (2026) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms14010228 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Essential for this mode of growth is a dominant adhesin, Surface Colonization Factor 1 (SFC1), in combination with a complementary adhesin, IFF4109 [8].”
Role of the transcription factor Wor2 in biofilm formation of Candidozyma auris
Louvet, M., Li, J., Areitio, M., Brandalise, D., Bachmann, D., Coste, A. T., LeibundGut‐Landmann, S., Sanglard, D., & Lamoth, F. (2026) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00057-26 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Padró-Villegas, L., & Mora-Montes, H. M. (2026) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof12060414 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Examples include Pap1 and Gp70 in S. schenckii [72–75], and Scf1 and Gpm1 in Candida spp. [76,77].”
Understanding pathogen emergence through the lens of Candida auris
O’Meara, T. R. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01700-2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationMamun, G. M. S., Shuvo, T. A., Khan, S., Mah‐E‐Muneer, S., Islam, M. A., Ahmed, D., Ahmed, K., Sen, D., Hossain, K., Islam, N., et al. (2025) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00393-25 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…molecular mechanisms of skin colonization are still unclear, studies among mice have reported that C. auris Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase and a C. auris -specific adhesin, surface colonization factor (Scf1), are essential for efficient skin colonization and intradermal persistence (10, 11).”
Climate Change Impacts on Environmental Fungi: Human Health and Fungal Disease
Irizarry, P. R., Smith, D. F. Q., & Gusa, A. A. (2025) · Current topics in microbiology and immunology · doi:10.1007/82_2025_305 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Candidozyma auris Outbreak and Its Effective Control in a General Hospital
Kontopidou, F. V., Antonopoulou, M., Votsi, A., Papoutsaki, V., Bereri, V., Kourkoulou, E., Rompola, A., Tsokou, G., Pavli, A., Koutantelia, O. M., et al. (2025) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14060579 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“This organism has the ability to colonize human skin, adhere and persist to inanimate surfaces (a process that is facilitated by the fungus adhesin surface colonization factor (Scf1)), and cause difficult-to-control outbreaks [7–9].”
Candida auris adhesins, specifically Als3, a key target to understand and mitigate
Lashine, Y., Hamdy, R., Dakalbab, S., Lazreg, I. K., Aldhaheri, F., Chin, S.-P., Hashim, N., & Soliman, S. S. M. (2025) · Mycologia · doi:10.1080/00275514.2025.2536345 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The fungus among us: Emerging and re-emerging fungal infections
Huang, J. H., Oliver, N. T., & Witt, L. S. (2025) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2025.10.011 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Shbeta, M., Kopp, T., Voronov, I., Yona, A., Afana, R. H., Carmeli, S., & Fridman, M. (2025) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.202521135 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Botbol, Y. M., Alves, V., Nimrichter, L., Macián, F., Nosanchuk, J. D., & Zamith‐Miranda, D. (2025) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1093/jimmun/vkaf302 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
C. elegans as a tractable infection model for the emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris
Martinez, M., Cruz, M. R., Garsin, D. A., & Lorenz, M. C. (2026) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.03156-25 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Papadimitriou, A., Drosopoulou, L.-P., Tseroni, M., Kontopidou, F. V., Tsakris, A., & Vrioni, G. (2026) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof12020131 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
mGem: Fungal adhesins in Candidozyma auris confer unique fitness for skin colonization
Balakumar, A., & Thangamani, S. (2026) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.03805-25 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Rux, C. E., Johnson, M. D., Grant, V. C., Katipunan, S. G., Chahine, E. B., Smith, D. J., Lockhart, S. R., Drwiega, E. N., Gubbins, P. O., & author, S. A. A. C. (2026) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.70122 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Phagocytic podosomes enable efficient uptake of Candida auris by primary human macrophages
Sopelniak, K., Batlouni, R., Sun, Q., Cervero, P., & Linder, S. (2026) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117167 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Innovation in antifungal therapy
Dellière, S., & Papon, N. (2026) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s44321-026-00449-x · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liu, M.-Y., Zhou, H., Shan, X., et al. (2026) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00760-25 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Langourani-Kosteletou, P., Kamariotis, S., Palavos, I., Georgousi, K. K., Vrioni, G., & Chatzikomninos, I. (2024) · Discover Medicine · doi:10.1007/s44337-024-00081-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Gifford, H., Bedekovic, T., Helmstetter, N., Gregory, J., Ma, Q., Brand, A., Wilson, D., Rhodes, J. L., Ramsdale, M., Kudoh, T., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.22.619744 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zhao, G., Lyu, J., Veniaminova, N. A., Zarnowski, R., Mattos, E., Johnson, C. J., Quintanilla, D., Hautau, H., Hold, L. A., Xu, B., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.13.637978 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationGoing fishing: how to get what you want from a fungal genetic screen
O’Meara, T. R. (2024) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00638-23 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationAndreu, C., & del Olmo, M. (2024) · Current Research in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.crbiot.2024.100242 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Prado, A., Costa, P. D. S., Brito, R. D. O., Ferreira, D. G., Caris, G. A. Y., Negri, M., & Svidzinski, T. I. E. (2025) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s42770-025-01662-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ramage, G., Kean, R., Mackay, W. G., Vaccaro, A., Lopez-Ribot, J. L., & Howe, M. H. (2025) · Springer series on biofilms · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93315-8_7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Brands, B., van Leuven, N., & Bockmühl, D. P. (2026) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens15030313 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Biocide Response of Candida auris
Erganiş, S., Öztürk, A., Şahin, E. A., & KALKANCI, A. (2026) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/myc.70169 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Vaccaro, A., Cooper, J. F., Rodríguez, A. V., Badali, H., Kean, R., Ramage, G., & Lopez-Ribot, J. L. (2026) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof12040247 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The C. auris -specific Surface Colonization Factor ( SCF1 ) differs from the majority of fungal adhesins by utilizing cation-substrate interactions that enhance long-term skin adherence and biofilm formation [16].”
Santos, S. R. D., Stempinski, P. R., Wieren, A. V., Gerbig, G. R., Smith, D. F. Q., Zamith‐Miranda, D., Nosanchuk, J. D., & Casadevall, A. (2026) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02897-25 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Negi, P., Verma, N., Rishi, P., Multani, K., Sharma, M., Kumari, S., & Raj, K. (2026) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-026-04864-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bella, A. A. L., Akegbe, H., Howell, C., Santiago-Tirado, F. H., & Flores‐Mireles, A. L. (2026) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00098-26 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Furthermore, AR0382 has been used by other groups in different model systems, facilitating a comparison across studies (7, 21–23).”
ZCF4-dependent suppression of MMP-9 drives virulence in fluconazole-resistant Candida auris
Hong, Y.-M., Wang, L., Yin, Z., Zou, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Wu, D., Zeng, X.-K., Zhou, J., Xu, W., et al. (2026) · hLife · doi:10.1016/j.hlife.2026.04.004 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Increasing threat to the healthcare setting: Candida auris
McDougal, A. N., & Ostrosky‐Zeichner, L. (2026) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/qco.0000000000001210 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Human keratinocytes and fibroblasts coordinate early cutaneous innate defenses against Candida auris
Seiser, S., Brezovec, H., Penninger, P., Phan-Canh, T., Moser, D., Assen, F. P., Ayub, T., Rademacher, F., Gläser, R., Cerbu, D., et al. (2026) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2026.06.1279 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Candida auris uses nutrient sensing to modulate virulence and host immune responses
Tedja, I., Weerasinghe, H., Bryak, G., Stölting, H., Lo, T. L., Simm, C., Swaminathan, A., Kraupner-Taylor, C. A., Harrison, P. F., Olivier, F. A. B., et al. (2026) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-026-02454-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“These results are in line with the reported genomic plasticity and phenotypic heterogeneity of C. auris 9,21,36,51,52 .”
InfluentialGenomic Innovation and Virulence Evolution in the Emerging Human Fungal Pathogen Candida auris
Gifford, H., Rhodes, J. L., Wilson, D., & Farrer, R. A. (2024) · The mycota · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-75666-5_10 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Convergent evolution on RBA1 regulates Candidozyma auris host adaptationPreprint
Doorley, L. A., Bella, A. A. L., Jones, S. J., Zhao, G., Asadzadeh, M., Choudhury, Q. J., Ahmad, S., Mokaddas, E. M., Al‐Obaid, I., Alfouzan, W. A., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.04.692421 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“As these adhesins are known to be critical to the ability of C. auris to adhere to a variety of substrates including human skin 26, 27 , this suggested that RBA1 may impact the propensity of C. auris to both colonize patients and establish new biofilms.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Santana, D. J., Anku, J. A. E., Zhao, G., Zarnowski, R., Johnson, C. J., Hautau, H., Visser, N. D., Ibrahim, A. S., Andes, D., Nett, J. E., Singh, S., & O’Meara, T. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Ghana (GH)
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- O’Meara, Teresa R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2023-09-29
- Volume
- 381
- Issue
- 6665
- Pages
- 1461-1467
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC11235122
- OpenAlex
- W4387128705
- Semantic Scholar
- e0262fbfb5177b14e3b79fa23998bb062df14f12
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 26.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association (938451)
- National Institutes of Health (5t32ai007413-32, T32 AI00,7413, R21AI159583, R01AI073289, T32AI007528, R01AI145939, KL2TR001882)
- Japan Atomic Energy Agency
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32-AI-007413, R01-AI073289, R21 AI159583, T32-AI007528, F31AI169823, R01 AI145939, R01AI141202, R01 AI063503, R21 AI169186)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR001882)
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, Los Angeles (KL2TR001882)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- Candida auris, fungal adhesins, surface colonization, biofilm formation, virulence, skin colonization, medical device colonization, cationic residues, fungal adhesion, emerging fungal pathogens
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Candida auris, Animals, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Microfilament Proteins, Virulence, Mice, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Candidiasis, Invasive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review