The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the Thomas–Kilmann Model: Into Extreme Conflict
Open accessAbstract
This article discusses an extension to the Thomas–Kilmann conflict mode instrument (Thomas and Kilmann 1977) designed specifically for conflict situations in which strong negative emotional relationships are at play. The Thomas–Kilmann (TK) model is widely used to help participants (disputants and mediators) identify how two basic conflict characteristics interact to influence how stakeholders shape their actions with regard to their interests. Essentially the TK Model is built on the premise that the two salient conflict variables are the relative importance of the relationships at hand and the substantive issues being discussed. These variables are illustrated with a simple matrix that shows how each party will interact with the other based on the relative importance it places on these variables. Graphically illustrating where the behaviors fall on the matrix can explicate parties' behaviors to add a new perspective that may change the dynamic of the conflict. But the TK Model does not address scenarios in which individuals have very negative or destructive relationships, and sabotage, blocking, and exclusion are behavioral norms. Hence, we developed the Baumoel–Trippe (BT) Extension to the TK Model to address the highly negative and often identity-based conflicts that are often found in the world of family business. Accordingly, the BT Extension to the TK Model explores conflicts in which the relationships are not merely unimportant or uncooperative, but where they become…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By addressing both substance and relationship dynamics, the Baumoel-Trippe Extension provides a more comprehensive approach to managing conflicts in family businesses.”
From Analysis of Conflict Management Styles and Organisational Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Trippe and Baumoel (2015)
In the citing paper
“The results of the study further indicated that, within family business environments, where personal relationships are deeply intertwined with business operations, the traditional TKI model was often insufficient for resolving conflicts effectively.”
From Analysis of Conflict Management Styles and Organisational Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Trippe and Baumoel (2015)
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the Baumoel-Trippe Extension, which emphasizes the emotional and relational aspects of conflict, proved to be more effective in helping family business stakeholders navigate conflicts driven by personal and emotional issues.”
From Analysis of Conflict Management Styles and Organisational Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Trippe and Baumoel (2015)
Citations
Cites
Maslow, A. H. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054346 · Cited by 21,563
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Atran, 2008, Reframing sacred values, Negotiation Journal, 24, 221, 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00182.x · DOI
- Brown, 2012, Empowering students to create and claim value through the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, Negotiation Journal, 28, 79, 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00327.x · DOI
- Fisher, 1983, Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in
- Savage, 1989, Consider both relationships and substance when negotiating strategically, Academy of Management Executive, 3, 37
- Schneider, 2013, Negotiation barometry: A dynamic measure of conflict management style, Ohio State University Journal On Dispute Resolution, 11, 1
- Thomas, 1977, Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict-handling behavior: The “mode” instrument, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 309, 10.1177/001316447703700204 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of Conflict Management Styles and Organisational Performance
(2025) · Journal of Management Changes in the Digital Era · doi:10.33168/jmcde.2025.0104 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Trippe, B., & Baumoel, D.
- Venue
- Negotiation Journal
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-103
- ISSN
- 0748-4526 (ISSN-L)
- 1571-9979
- OpenAlex
- W1823506621
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Negotiation Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Conflict Management and Negotiation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education for Peace and Conflict Resolution
- Social Sciences › Law › Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
- Keywords
- Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, sabotage, blocking, exclusion, identity-based conflict, family business conflicts, family relationships, mediation (conflict resolution), stakeholder behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review