CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44Pain Management and TreatmentDeep Brain Stimulation and Movement DisordersParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beneficial Therapeutic Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Advanced Cases of Parkinson’s Disease With Intractable Chronic Pain: A Case Series

Nishioka, Kenya, Nakajima, Madoka·2015·Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
DOI 10.1111/ner.12315
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives Pain is one of the common symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), with a prevalence of approximately 40-85%. These symptoms affect the quality of life of PD patients. We evaluated the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to chronic pain and motor symptoms of PD. Materials and methods Three PD patients were treated with SCS to relieve their persistent and intractable pain. One patient had failed back surgery syndrome and the other two had lumbar canal stenosis. All patients had a stooped posture and pain that was resistant to analgesics. We evaluated motor symptoms using Hoehn and Yahr scale and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and evaluated pain using visual analog scale and widespread pain index, before and after SCS. Results After SCS insertion, chronic pain in the patients decreased in both the lower back and limbs. Moreover, SCS ameliorated the symptoms of PD. One-year follow-up after SCS showed that UPDRS part III scores, rigidity, and tremor were improved without large alterations in levodopa dosage. Dementia and activities of daily living did not improve after SCS. Discussion and conclusion Our results indicate that SCS may be a treatment option for both motor symptoms and chronic pain in PD, especially in cases complicated with lumbar canal stenosis or disc herniation. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of SCS in PD patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ner.12315

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 44

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nishioka, K., & Nakajima, M.
Affiliations
Juntendo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nishioka, Kenya
ORCID
Venue
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
751-753
ISSN
1094-7159 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/ner.12315
OpenAlex
W2107837377
Cited by
44
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
spinal cord stimulation, Parkinson's disease, chronic intractable pain, motor symptoms, lumbar spinal stenosis, failed back surgery syndrome, disc herniation, tremor, rigidity, levodopa dose
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Pain Measurement, Parkinson Disease, Chronic Pain, Spinal Cord Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review