CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Global Health Workforce IssuesHealthcare Systems and ChallengesOccupational and Professional Licensing Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A critical race analysis of structural and institutional racism: rethinking overseas registered nurses’ recruitment to and working conditions in the United Kingdom

Open access
Ugiagbe, Iyore M., Liu, Liang Q., Markowski, Marianne, Allan, Helen·2023·Nursing Inquiry
DOI 10.1111/nin.12512PMC PMC10077904
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Language tests for overseas registered nurses (ORN) working outside their home country are essential for patient safety, as communication competency needs to be established in any workforce. We argue that the current employment of existing language tests is structurally and institutionally racist and disadvantages ORNs from non-European Union (EU) and non-White countries seeking to work in the United Kingdom. Using Critical Race Theory (CRT), we argue that existing English language tests for ORNs seeking registration in the United Kingdom are discriminatory due to the UK's racist migration policies and a regulatory body for nursing and midwifery that fails to acknowledge and understand its own institutionally racist practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nin.12512

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02095 · DOI
  2. Baxter C., 1988, The Black nurse: An endangered species
  3. Bell D. A., 1995, Who's afraid of critical race theory? David C. Baum Memorial Lectures on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights at the University of Illinois College of Law​, University of Illinois Law Review, 1995, 893
  4. Diangelo R., 2018, White fragility
  5. Gagen T.(2019).The predictivevalidity ofIELTSScores:A meta‐ analysis[Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Western Ontario. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8762&context=etd
  6. HCL Workforce Solutions, 2017, IELTS and declining nurse recruitment: Don't blame Brexit.
  7. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00705 · DOI
  8. Maranzagov R., 2016, The labour market for nurses in the UK and its relationship to, and supply of, international nurses in the NHS
  9. Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2017, English language requirements.
  10. Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2017, NMC Registering as a nurse or midwife in the UK Information for applicants trained outside the European Union or European Economic Area.
  11. Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2017, Report on English language consultation in October 2017.
  12. Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). (2017d).NMC to amend English language requirements for applicants trained outside the UK. https://www.nmc.org.uk/news/press-releases/nmc-amend-english-language-requirements-applicants-trained-outside-the-uk/
  13. Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2017, List of accepted English speaking countries.
  14. Reynolds D., 2019, Island stories: Britain and its history in the age of Brexit
  15. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.002 · DOI
  16. Shaw S. D., 2007, Modelling facets of the assessment of writing within an ES menvironment, Research Notes, 27, 14
  17. Taylor L., 2002, Assessing learner's English: But research notes whose/which English(es)?, Research Notes, 10, 18

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ugiagbe, I. M., Liu, L. Q., Markowski, M., & Allan, H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Adult Nursing, Child Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Critical Research in Nursing and Midwifery Middlesex University London UK
  • Middlesex University London (GB)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Nursing Inquiry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07-13
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
e12512-e12512
ISSN
  • 1320-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1800
DOI
10.1111/nin.12512
PMC
PMC10077904
OpenAlex
W4285391718
Cited by
17
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nursing Inquiry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Law › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Keywords
structural racism, institutional racism, language tests, English proficiency, nurse recruitment, working conditions, migration policy, critical race theory, nursing regulation, patient safety, communication skills, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Systemic Racism, Working Conditions, United Kingdom, Humans, Nurses, Nurses, International

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review