The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0
Open accessAbstract
Background: The Chicago Classification ( CC ) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high‐resolution manometry ( HRM ) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide. Methods: This 2014 update, CC v3.0, developed by the International HRM Working Group, incorporated the extensive clinical experience and interval publications since the prior (2011) version. Key Results: Chicago Classification v3.0 utilizes a hierarchical approach, sequentially prioritizing: (i) disorders of esophagogastric junction ( EGJ ) outflow (achalasia subtypes I‐III and EGJ outflow obstruction), (ii) major disorders of peristalsis (absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus), and (iii) minor disorders of peristalsis characterized by impaired bolus transit. EGJ morphology, characterized by the degree of overlap between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm and baseline EGJ contractility are also part of CC v3.0. Compared to the previous CC version, the key metrics of interpretation, the integrated relaxation pressure ( IRP ), the distal contractile integral ( DCI ), and the distal latency ( DL ) remain unchanged, albeit with much more emphasis on DCI for defining both hypo‐ and hypercontractility. New in CC v3.0 are: (i) the evaluation of the EGJ at rest defined in terms of morphology and contractility, (ii) ‘fragmented’ contractions (large breaks in the 20‐mmHg isobaric contour), (iii) ineffective esophageal motility ( IEM ), and (iv) several minor adjustments in nomenclature and defining criteria. Absent in CC v3.0 are contractile front velocity and small breaks in the 20‐mmHg isobaric contour as defining characteristics. Conclusions & Inferences: Chicago Classification v3.0 is an updated analysis scheme for clinical esophageal HRM recordings developed by the International HRM Working Group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Method to Objectively Assess Swallow Function in Adults With Suspected Aspiration
Omari, T. I., Dejaeger, E., van Beckevoort, D., Goeleven, A., Davidson, G. P., Dent, J., Tack, J., & Rommel, N. (2011) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.051 · Cited by 142
Reproducibility and Agreement of Pharyngeal Automated Impedance Manometry With Videofluoroscopy
Omari, T. I., Papathanasopoulos, A., Dejaeger, E., Wauters, L., Scarpellini, E., Vos, R., Slootmaekers, S., Seghers, V., Cornelissen, L., Goeleven, A., et al. (2011) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.05.026 · Cited by 73
Cited by
Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus
Gyawali, C. P., Kahrilas, P. J., Savarino, E., Zerbib, F., Mion, F., Smout, A. J. P. M., Vaezi, M., Sifrim, D., Fox, M. R., Vela, M. F., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationEsophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©
Yadlapati, R., Kahrilas, P. J., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A. J., Prakash Gyawali, C., Roman, S., Babaei, A., Mittal, R. K., Rommel, N., Savarino, E., et al. (2021) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.14058 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia
Vaezi, M. F., Pandolfino, J. E., & Vela, M. F. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.196 · Cited by 732
Self-citationThe 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines
Zaninotto, G., Bennett, C., Boeckxstaens, G., Costantini, M., Ferguson, M. K., Pandolfino, J. E., Patti, M. G., Ribeiro, U., Richter, J., Swanstrom, L., et al. (2018) · Diseases of the Esophagus · doi:10.1093/dote/doy071 · Cited by 357
Self-citationCarrington, E. V., Heinrich, H., Knowles, C. H., Fox, M., Rao, S., Altomare, D. F., Bharucha, A. E., Burgell, R., Chey, W. D., Chiarioni, G., et al. (2020) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.13679 · Cited by 325
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kahrilas, P. J., Bredenoord, A. J., Fox, M., Gyawali, C. P., Roman, S., Smout, A. J. P. M., Pandolfino, J. E., & International High Resolution Manometry Working Group
- Venue
- Neurogastroenterology & Motility
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160-174
- ISSN
- 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2982
- OpenAlex
- W2023804350
- Cited by
- 1,964
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 108.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.