CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnostic and clinical utility of the wireless motility capsule in children: A study in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders

Rodriguez, Leonel, Heinz, Nicole, Colliard, Kitzia, Amicangelo, Maureen, Nurko, Samuel·2021·Neurogastroenterology & Motility
DOI 10.1111/nmo.14032
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background The wireless motility capsule (WMC) evaluates gastrointestinal motility and transit simultaneously. We evaluated the utility of the WMC in children with functional gastrointestinal symptoms. Methods Study in children comparing WMC transit and motility parameters between those with upper (UGI) or lower (LGI) gastrointestinal symptoms, nuclear medicine gastric emptying time (NMGET) and/or a colonic radiopaque marker (CROM) study. Key results We prospectively recruited 57 children (median age 16.45y, range 8.78-17.8y, 44 Female) and 50 completed the study (24 UGI/26 LGI). We found no association between WMC study interpretation, motility and transit parameters and symptoms. WMC and NMGET interpretation agreement observed in 24/34 (70%) (κ = 0.351, p = 0.026) and with CROM in 17/21 (81%) patients (κ = 0.576, p = 0.007). WMC detected abnormal gastric transit in 41% vs. 24% with NMGET (p = 0.04) and abnormal colon transit in 62% vs. 71% of patients by CROM (p = 0.01). We found significant correlation (r = 0.574, p = 0.01) and no difference in median colon transit (p = 0.421) by WMC and CROM. A single WMC motility parameter, mean peak amplitude, was associated with NMGET (p = 0.04), none with CROM. Capsule retention >5 days (n = 9, all passed Conclusions WMC is well tolerated in children as young as 8 years old. We found no association between WMC and symptoms, fair agreement with NMGET and strong agreement with CROM. WMC increases the yield of finding gastrointestinal tr…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.14032

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advanced techniques, including antroduodenal‐jejunal manometry, wireless motility capsule, gastric ultrasound, and high‐resolution electrogastrography (EGG), may provide additional pathophysiological insight, particularly in complex or mixed‐pattern cases.

    “Advanced techniques, including antroduodenal‑jejunal manometry [71–75], wireless motility capsule [76–79], gastric ultrasound [80–82], and high‑resolution electrogastrography (EGG) [83–87] may provide additional pathophysiological insight, particularly in complex or mixed‑pattern cases.”

    From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02076.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01612.x · DOI
  3. 10.2967/jnmt.107.048116 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.040 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF01957362 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s00383-009-2387-x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.063 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181ff0122 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/nmo.13196 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10620-009-0899-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03564.x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.archger.2012.04.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01517.x · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s10620-014-3431-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s10620-011-1751-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices

    Galeano, F., Tumminia, A., Oteri, V., Le Moli, R., Piticchio, T., Scilletta, S., Di Marco, M., Di Pino, A., & Frasca, F. (2026) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-026-04693-6

    “Advanced techniques, including antroduodenal-jejunal manometry [71–75], wireless motility capsule [76–79], gastric ultrasound [80–82], and high-resolution electrogas-trography (EGG) [83–87] may provide additional pathophysiological insight, particularly in complex or mixed-pattern cases.”

Metadata

Authors
Rodriguez, L., Heinz, N., Colliard, K., Amicangelo, M., & Nurko, S.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Rodriguez, Leonel
ORCID
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-12
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
e14032-e14032
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
DOI
10.1111/nmo.14032
OpenAlex
W3098755246
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
wireless motility capsule, functional gastrointestinal disorders, pediatric patients, gastrointestinal motility, gastrointestinal transit, gastric emptying, colonic transit, capsule retention, diagnostic agreement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Gastric Emptying, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Gastrointestinal Motility, Gastrointestinal Transit, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Capsule Endoscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review