Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Iberogast (STW5) on Tolerance to Colonic Gas in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control Clinical Trial

Aguilar, Ariadna, Benslaiman, Bouchra, Serra, Jordi·2024·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background: STW5 is an herbal medicinal product that, in previous studies, reduced abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The effect of STW5 on gas‐related abdominal symptoms is unknown. Aim: To determine the effects of STW5, compared to placebo, on the responses to colonic gas in IBS. Methods: Using a cross‐over design, two gas challenge tests were performed in 10 patients with IBS and bloating after 2‐weeks treatment with (a) STW5 and (b) placebo. The challenge test consisted in continuous infusion of gas into the colon (24 mL/min for 60 min), followed by a 30‐min free evacuation period. Gas evacuation, symptom perception, and abdominal distension were continuously registered. Results: Colonic gas filling was associated to a significant rise in abdominal symptom perception, that was significantly greater when patients were on‐placebo (score increment 4.0 ± 0.3) compared with on‐STW5 (score increment 3.2 ± 0.4; p = 0.035). Gas filling was associated to a progressive abdominal distension that was similar with both treatments. Opening of the rectal cannula produced a massive gas evacuation, similar after both treatments, associated to a return of abdominal perception and distension to basal levels when patients were on‐STW5 (score increment −0.1 ± 0.4; distension 0.3 ± 0.2 cm; p = 0.399, and p = 0.112 vs. basal), whereas both remained increased on‐placebo (score increment 0.5 ± 0.3; distension 0.8 ± 0.3 cm; p = 0.048, and p = 0.016 vs. infusion start). Conclusions: STW5 improves colonic gas tolerance in IBS patients with bloating without a significant effect on gas retention and evacuation. This medicinal product can be beneficious for treatment of gas‐related abdominal symptoms in patients with bloating. EudraCT: 2019‐003976‐38.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.14765

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.24890/pc.13 · DOI
  2. 10.1055/s-2002-32130 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s10354-012-0169-x · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01859.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1055/s-2001-16142 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01183.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.07.001 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01142.x · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01249.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.08.004 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00576.x · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00384-012-1473-z · DOI
  13. 10.3389/fphar.2016.00393 · DOI
  14. Aubert P, 2017, Iberogast prevents changes in intestinal permeability induced by psychological stress in mice, UEG J, 5, A559
  15. 10.1016/S0016-5085(17)30995-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/gut.48.1.14 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1053/gast.2002.35394 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00875.x · DOI
  19. 10.1136/gut.2003.038158 · DOI
  20. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.036 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/ajg.2010.408 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/ajg.2010.75 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/nmo.14433 · DOI
  24. Schulz KF, 2010, CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials, BMJ, 340, 698
  25. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02141.x · DOI
  26. Mearin F, 2016, Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, 967
  27. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05336.x · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01447.x · DOI
  29. 10.1111/nmo.13963 · DOI
  30. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.047 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/nmo.12662 · DOI
  32. 10.1186/s40168-022-01450-5 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s11894-011-0195-7 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Simrén M, 2017, Visceral hypersensitivity is associated with GI symptom severity in functional GI disorders: consistent findings from five different patient cohorts, Gut, 1, 255
  35. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.03.014 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.03.012 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.03.020 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.03.013 · DOI
  39. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.067 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70133-7 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/nmo.13408 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/nmo.13128 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Aguilar, A., Benslaiman, B., & Serra, J.
Affiliations
Digestive System Research Unit University Hospital Vall d'Hebrón Barcelona Spain
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-02-15
Volume
36
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1350-1925
  • 1365-2982
Cited by
9
References
4
Language
en
Funders
Bayer Fund

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.