Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic Review: Integrated Models of Care for Managing Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Warner, Molly M., Soliman, Olivia Marie, Crichton, Megan, Marshall, Skye, Staudacher, Heidi M., Kelly, Jaimon T.·2025·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background: Multidisciplinary integrated models of care show promise for improving symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Aims: To describe and evaluate the characteristics of integrated models of care for IBS and identify how digital health is being used in these models of care. Methods: Four databases were searched to March 2024 for studies that included adults with IBS who participated in multidisciplinary integrated models of care that delivered non‐pharmacological therapies. The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to appraise study quality and extract model of care characteristics, which were mapped against the Project INTEGRATE framework to establish topics. Results: Sixteen studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 2 quasi‐experimental, 8 cohort studies) reported 14 integrated models of care including 2165 patients of which 918 were IBS patients. Integrated models of care led to improved IBS symptoms (n = 11/13 models of care) and QoL (n = 6/9 models of care). Studies showed moderate compliance with the TIDieR checklist. Five topics were established: clinicians involved, therapies provided, location and mode of delivery, coordinating clinical partnerships, and sharing visions and values of integrated care. Most commonly, a gastroenterologist coordinated care with a psychologist, dietitian, and/or nurse in tertiary care. Psychological, dietary, and physical therapies were provided by n = 11, n = 8, and n = 3 integrated models of care, respectively. Six models of care provided joint consultations or group sessions. Four models of care used digital health such as telephone coaching or online modules. Conclusions: Integrated models of care for IBS exhibited diverse characteristics including the clinicians involved, the therapies provided and the mode of delivery of each therapy. There is a need to evaluate the use of digital health and the delivery of integrated models of care in primary care settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.14989

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.12.009 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/jcag/gwad028 · DOI
  5. 10.5694/mja17.00457 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/jcag/gwy071 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/s00535‐020‐01746‐z · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/S2468‐1253(22)00207‐2 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000379 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/jgh.14830 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/jgh3.13072 · DOI
  12. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002220 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.09.013 · DOI
  14. “Covidence Systematic Review Software ”2024.www.covidence.org.
  15. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106764 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/13561820.2020.1864307 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.005 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.12.002 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/s1542‐3565(03)00218‐0 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.005 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.explore.2018.04.008 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s10620‐022‐07464‐1 · DOI
  23. 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1893 · DOI
  24. 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000335 · DOI
  25. McNally M., 2020, An IBS Pathway to Improve Patient Experience and Reduce Endoscopy Demand, Irish Medical Journal, 113, 1
  26. 10.1136/flgastro‐2018‐101063 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.05.016 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/jcag/gwy061 · DOI
  29. 10.4102/hsag.v6i4.82 · DOI
  30. 10.1136/flgastro‐2016‐100727 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105828 · DOI
  32. 10.5334/ijic.2530 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.016 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/apt.17791 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/eat.23527 · DOI
  36. 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000436 · DOI
  37. 10.2196/26152 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/nmo.14554 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/s0016‐5085(18)33277‐3 · DOI
  40. 10.1186/s12876‐021‐02030‐x · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107877 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S2468‐1253(23)00102‐4 · DOI

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Warner, M. M., Soliman, O. M., Crichton, M., Marshall, S., Staudacher, H. M., & Kelly, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, Centre for Online Health The University of Queensland Woolloongabba Queensland Australia
  • School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia
  • Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove Queensland Australia
  • Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Food & Mood Centre Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-01-03
Volume
37
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1350-1925
  • 1365-2982
Cited by
9
References
10
Language
en
Funders
Australian Government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Review: Integrated Models of Care for Managing Irritable Bowel Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nmo.14989
The paper
Warner, M. M., Soliman, O. M., Crichton, M., Marshall, S., Staudacher, H. M., & Kelly, J. T. (2025). Systematic Review: Integrated Models of Care for Managing Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14989

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.