The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Plant survival during drought requires adequate hydration in living tissues and carbohydrate reserves for maintenance and recovery. We hypothesized that tree growth and hydraulic strategy determines the intensity and duration of the ‘physiological drought’, thereby affecting the relative contributions of loss of hydraulic function and carbohydrate depletion during mortality. We compared patterns in growth rate, water relations, gas exchange and carbohydrate dynamics in three tree species subjected to prolonged drought. Two E ucalyptus species (E. globulus, E. smithii) exhibited high growth rates and water‐use resulting in rapid declines in water status and hydraulic conductance. In contrast, conservative growth and water relations in P inus radiata resulted in longer periods of negative carbon balance and significant depletion of stored carbohydrates in all organs. The ongoing demand for carbohydrates from sustained respiration highlighted the role that duration of drought plays in facilitating carbohydrate consumption. Two drought strategies were revealed, differentiated by plant regulation of water status: plants maximized gas exchange, but were exposed to low water potentials and rapid hydraulic dysfunction; and tight regulation of gas exchange at the cost of carbohydrate depletion. These findings provide evidence for a relationship between hydraulic regulation of water status and carbohydrate depletion during terminal drought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D. D., Hogg, E. H. (., et al. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 · Cited by 7,763
Cited by
Hartmann, H., & Trumbore, S. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13955 · Cited by 886
Anderegg, W. R. L., Klein, T., Bartlett, M., Sack, L., Pellegrini, A. F. A., Choat, B., & Jansen, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1525678113 · Cited by 882
How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses
SEVANTO, S., MCDOWELL, N. G., DICKMAN, L. T., PANGLE, R., & POCKMAN, W. T. (2014) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12141 · Cited by 868
Drought survival of tropical tree seedlings enhanced by non-structural carbohydrate levels
O’Brien, M. J., Leuzinger, S., Philipson, C. D., Tay, J., & Hector, A. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2281 · Cited by 516
Evaluating theories of drought‐induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel–experiment framework
McDowell, N. G., Fisher, R. A., Xu, C., Domec, J. C., Hölttä, T., Mackay, D. S., Sperry, J. S., Boutz, A., Dickman, L., Gehres, N., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12465 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, P. J., O'Grady, A. P., Tissue, D. T., White, D. A., Ottenschlaeger, M. L., & Pinkard, E. A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-10
- Volume
- 197
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 862-872
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2001636726
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12064
- The paper
- Mitchell, P. J., O'Grady, A. P., Tissue, D. T., White, D. A., Ottenschlaeger, M. L., & Pinkard, E. A. (2013). Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.