Next‐generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology
Abstract
Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are powerful tools to project past, current and future vegetation patterns and associated biogeochemical cycles. However, most models are limited by how they define vegetation and by their simplistic representation of competition. We discuss how concepts from community assembly theory and coexistence theory can help to improve vegetation models. We further present a trait- and individual-based vegetation model (aDGVM2) that allows individual plants to adopt a unique combination of trait values. These traits define how individual plants grow and compete. A genetic optimization algorithm is used to simulate trait inheritance and reproductive isolation between individuals. These model properties allow the assembly of plant communities that are adapted to a site's biotic and abiotic conditions. The aDGVM2 simulates how environmental conditions influence the trait spectra of plant communities; that fire selects for traits that enhance fire protection and reduces trait diversity; and the emergence of life-history strategies that are suggestive of colonization-competition trade-offs. The aDGVM2 deals with functional diversity and competition fundamentally differently from current DGVMs. This approach may yield novel insights as to how vegetation may respond to climate change and we believe it could foster collaborations between functional plant biologists and vegetation modellers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dynamic global vegetation models are now being modified to make plant traits an emergent evolutionary process.
“For example, whereas dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) conventionally used static plant traits and emphasized resource competition as the primary driver of species composition, these models are now being modified to make plant traits an emergent evolutionary process (Scheiter, Langan, & Higgins, 2013).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Scheiter et al., 2013
Dynamic global vegetation models conventionally used static plant traits and emphasized resource competition as the primary driver of species composition.
“For example, whereas dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) conventionally used static plant traits and emphasized resource competition as the primary driver of species composition, these models are now being modified to make plant traits an emergent evolutionary process (Scheiter, Langan, & Higgins, 2013).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Scheiter et al., 2013
Cites
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645 · see citing works
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frank, D., Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Thonicke, K., Frank, D., Mahecha, M. D., Smith, P., van der Velde, M., Vicca, S., Babst, F., et al. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12916 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“…whereas dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) conventionally used static plant traits and emphasized resource competition as the primary driver of species composition, these models are now being modified to make plant traits an emergent evolutionary process (Scheiter, Langan, & Higgins, 2013).”
- Authors
- Scheiter, S., Langan, L., & Higgins, S. I.
- Affiliations
- Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research (DE)
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Scheiter, Simon
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-15
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 957-969
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2044797544
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 32.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- dynamic global vegetation models, coexistence theory, plant functional traits, plant competition, inheritance of traits, reproductive isolation, functional diversity, life history strategies, climate change response, plant community assembly
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Fires, Models, Biological, Plants, Multifactorial Inheritance, Principal Component Analysis, Biota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review