The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analysis of experimental warming effects on terrestrial nitrogen pools and dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Global warming may have profound effects on terrestrial ecosystems. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of warming on ecosystem nitrogen (N) pools and dynamics is not available. Here, we compiled data of 528 observations from 51 papers and carried out a meta‐analysis of experimental warming effects on 13 variables related to terrestrial N pools and dynamics. We found that, on average, net N mineralization and net nitrification rate were increased by 52.2 and 32.2%, respectively, under experimental warming treatment. N pools were also increased by warming, although the magnitude of this increase was less than that of N fluxes. Soil microbial N and N immobilization were not changed by warming, probably because microbes are limited by carbon sources. Grassland and shrubland/heathland were less responsive to warming than forest, probably because the reduction of soil moisture by warming offset the temperature effect in these areas. Soil heating cable and all‐day treatment appeared to be the most effective method on N cycling among all treatment methods. Results of this meta‐analysis are useful for better understanding the response of N cycling to global warming and the underlying mechanism of warming effects on plants and ecosystem functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 2×
“A nonparametric weighting function was used to weight individual studies (Hedges et al., 1999).”
Method
Cited by
Wang, C., Liu, D., & Bai, E. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.003 · Cited by 689
Self-citationLuo, G., Li, L., Friman, V.-P., Guo, J., Guo, S., Shen, Q., & Ling, N. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.002 · Cited by 546
Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by Earth system models during the 21st century
Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Randerson, J. T., Hopkins, F., Arora, V., Hajima, T., Jones, C., Shevliakova, E., Tjiputra, J., Volodin, E., Wu, T., et al. (2014) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-11-2341-2014 · Cited by 408
Ecology of Nitrogen Fixing, Nitrifying, and Denitrifying Microorganisms in Tropical Forest Soils
Pajares, S., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01045 · Cited by 331
Global patterns and controlling factors of soil nitrification rate
Li, Z., Zeng, Z., Tian, D., Wang, J., Fu, Z., Zhang, F., Zhang, R., Chen, W., Luo, Y., & Niu, S. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15119 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, E., Li, S., Xu, W., Li, W., Dai, W., & Jiang, P.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-04
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 441-451
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2161439417
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis of experimental warming effects on terrestrial nitrogen pools and dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12252
- The paper
- Bai, E., Li, S., Xu, W., Li, W., Dai, W., & Jiang, P. (2013). A meta‐analysis of experimental warming effects on terrestrial nitrogen pools and dynamics. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
