Cited by 47Plant Molecular Biology ResearchGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsPlant Parasitism and Resistance

Multiple loci and genetic interactions involving flowering time genes regulate stem branching among natural variants of Arabidopsis

Open access
Huang, Xueqing, Ding, Jia, Effgen, Sigi, Turck, Franziska, Koornneef, Maarten·2013·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Shoot branching is a major determinant of plant architecture. Genetic variants for reduced stem branching in the axils of cauline leaves of Arabidopsis were found in some natural accessions and also at low frequency in the progeny of multiparent crosses. Detailed genetic analysis using segregating populations derived from backcrosses with the parental lines and bulked segregant analysis was used to identify the allelic variation controlling reduced stem branching. Eight quantitative trait loci ( QTL s) contributing to natural variation for reduced stem branching were identified ( REDUCED STEM BRANCHING 1–8 ( RSB 1–8 )). Genetic analysis showed that RSB 6 and RSB 7 , corresponding to flowering time genes FLOWERING LOCUS C ( FLC ) and FRIGIDA ( FRI ), epistatically regulate stem branching. Furthermore, FLOWERING LOCUS T ( FT ), which corresponds to RSB 8 as demonstrated by fine‐mapping, transgenic complementation and expression analysis, caused pleiotropic effects not only on flowering time, but, in the specific background of active FRI and FLC alleles, also on the RSB trait. The consequence of allelic variation only expressed in late‐flowering genotypes revealed novel and thus far unsuspected roles of several genes well characterized for their roles in flowering time control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.12306

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, X., Ding, J., Effgen, S., Turck, F., & Koornneef, M.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Xueqing
  • Koornneef, Maarten
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-14
Volume
199
Issue
3
Pages
843-857
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2096059337
Cited by
47
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Keywords
stem branching, flowering time genes, Arabidopsis thaliana, quantitative trait loci, FLOWERING LOCUS C, FRIGIDA, FLOWERING LOCUS T, epistasis, pleiotropy, plant architecture, natural genetic variation, fine mapping, transgenic complementation
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Crosses, Genetic, Epistasis, Genetic, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Inbreeding, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenotype, Reproducibility of Results, Genes, Plant, Arabidopsis, Plant Stems, Physical Chromosome Mapping, MADS Domain Proteins, Arabidopsis Proteins, Flowers, Quantitative Trait Loci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review