The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The PGPR strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM 196 induces a reproductive delay and physiological changes that result in improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Understanding how biotic interactions can improve plant tolerance to drought is a challenging prospect for agronomy and ecology. Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are promising candidates but the phenotypic changes induced by PGPR under drought remain to be elucidated. We investigated the effects of P hyllobacterium brassicacearum STM 196 strain, a PGPR isolated from the rhizosphere of oilseed rape, on two accessions of A rabidopsis thaliana with contrasting flowering time. We measured multiple morphophysiological traits related to plant growth and development in order to quantify the added value of the bacteria to drought‐response strategies of A rabidopsis in soil conditions. A delay in reproductive development induced by the bacteria resulted in a gain of biomass that was independent of the accession and the watering regime. Coordinated changes in transpiration, ABA content, photosynthesis and development resulted in higher water‐use efficiency and a better tolerance to drought of inoculated plants. Our findings give new insights into the ecophysiological bases by which PGPR can confer stress tolerance to plants. Rhizobacteria‐induced delay in flowering time could represent a valuable strategy for increasing biomass yield, whereas rhizobacteria‐induced improvement of water use is of particular interest in multiple scenarios of water availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil
Hoagland, D. R., & Arnon, D. I. (1938) · Cited by 11,217
The Water-Culture Method of Growing Plants without Soil.
Hoaglang, D. R. (1950) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,555
Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., & Basra, S. M. A. (2009) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro:2008021 · Cited by 4,098
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · Cited by 3,987
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Plant Stomata Function in Innate Immunity against Bacterial Invasion
Melotto, M., Underwood, W., Koczan, J., Nomura, K., & He, S. Y. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.054 · Cited by 1,981
Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress
Yang, J., Kloepper, J. W., & Ryu, C.-M. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004 · Cited by 1,852
Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Wei, H.-X., Paré, P. W., & Kloepper, J. W. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0730845100 · Cited by 1,656
Integration of Plant Responses to Environmentally Activated Phytohormonal Signals
Achard, P., Cheng, H., De Grauwe, L., Decat, J., Schoutteten, H., Moritz, T., Van Der Straeten, D., Peng, J., & Harberd, N. P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1118642 · Cited by 1,552
Cited by
Does plant—Microbe interaction confer stress tolerance in plants: A review?
Kumar, A., & Verma, J. P. (2018) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.004 · Cited by 747
The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses
Chieb, M., & Gachomo, E. W. (2023) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8 · Cited by 404
Enebe, M. C., & Babalola, O. O. (2018) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-018-9214-z · Cited by 357
The Effects of Plant-Associated Bacterial Exopolysaccharides on Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance
Morcillo, R., & Manzanera, M. (2021) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo11060337 · Cited by 308
Humplík, J. F., Lazár, D., Husičková, A., & Spíchal, L. (2015) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-015-0072-8 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Bresson, J., Varoquaux, F., Bontpart, T., Touraine, B., & Vile, D.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-07-04
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 558-569
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2110657160
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 10.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The PGPR strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM 196 induces a reproductive delay and physiological changes that result in improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12383
- The paper
- Bresson, J., Varoquaux, F., Bontpart, T., Touraine, B., & Vile, D. (2013). The PGPR strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM 196 induces a reproductive delay and physiological changes that result in improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
